Somatostatin analogues containing o-aminomethylphenylacetic acid as a bridge unit

Summary A new cis-peptide bond mimetic, -benzyl-o-aminomethylphenylacetic acid, was synthesized and incorporated in a homodetic somatostatin analogue. Biological binding tests and 2D NMR conformational analysis indicate that the configuration of the bridge-unit asymmetric center and the orientation of the benzyl side chain play a key role in the biological activity of this type of somatostatin analogues.     

Synthesis of 4′-methoxyadenosine and related compounds

Addition of iodine and methanol to N⁶,N⁶-dibenzoyl-9(2,3-O-carbonyl-5-deoxy-β-d-erythro-pent-4-enofuranosyl)adenine (4) selectively gives N⁶,N⁶-dibenzoyl-2′,3′-O-carbonyl-5′-deoxy-5′-iodo-4′-methoxyadenosine (5). Compound 5 can be converted into 4′-methoxyadenosine via hydrolysis of the carbonate followed by benzoylation, displacement of the 5′-iodo function by benzoate ion, and hydrolysis with ammonia. Configurational assignments are based upon comparisons of ¹H- and ¹³C-n.m.r. spectra with those of previously characterised analogues in the uracil series and by borate electrophoresis. Intermediates in the above scheme have also been converted into 5′-amino-5′-deoxy-4′-methoxyadenosine, 4′-methoxy-5′-O-sulfamoyladenosine, and ethyl 4′-methoxyadenosine-5′-carboxylate, each of which is a 4′-methoxy analogue of biologically active derivatives of adenosine.     

A typical browser, the roe deer, may consume substantial quantities of grasses in open landscapes

In open landscapes, grass leaves provide an abundant resource for ruminants, with potentially high nutritional value. However, their extensive digestion requires a long fermentation time, achieved through large rumen and the stratification of the rumen content. Due to anatomical and physiological differences, ruminants differ in their ability to process grass leaves. Particularly, the small roe deer, with its viscous saliva and unstratified rumen content, is generally classified as a strict browser. We hypothesised that roe deer may be able to use grass leaves in some circumstances, notably when the availability of other resources declines and when the quality of grass leaves is high. We expected that (1) grass leave consumption should be higher in open landscapes than in forest habitat because grasses are more widely available and more nutritious in open landscapes and (2) grass leave consumption should increase in winter when the availability of other resources declines. We assessed grass consumption by microscopic analysis of roe deer faecal pellets collected monthly both in forest habitat and in the surrounding open landscape. We found that both the occurrence and the proportion of grass leaves in the faeces were higher in the open landscape (predicted mean proportion 0.31) than in the forest (predicted mean proportion 0.05). In addition, the proportion of grass leaves in the faeces was higher in winter and lower in spring in both forest and open landscape. We suggest that roe deer are able to use grass leaves with unusually high nutritional quality in winter in this mild climate area. This involves a certain level of digestive plasticity to efficiently digest high quality grasses and may confer nutritional benefit to individuals feeding in an open landscape.     

Landscape fragmentation generates spatial variation of diet composition and quality in a generalist herbivore

Forest fragmentation may benefit generalist herbivores by increasing access to various substitutable food resources, with potential consequences for their population dynamics. We studied a European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population living in an agricultural mosaic of forest, woodlots, meadows and cultivated crops. We tested whether diet composition and quality varied spatially across the landscape using botanical analyses of rumen contents and chemical analyses of the plants consumed in relation to landscape metrics. In summer and non-mast winters, roe deer ate more cultivated seeds and less native forest browse with increasing availability of crops in the local landscape. This spatial variation resulted in contrasting diet quality, with more cell content and lower lignin and hemicellulose content (high quality) for individuals living in more open habitats. The pattern was less marked in the other seasons when diet composition, but not diet quality, was only weakly related to landscape structure. In mast autumns and winters, the consumption of acorns across the entire landscape resulted in a low level of differentiation in diet composition and quality. Our results reflect the ability of generalist species, such as roe deer, to adapt to the fragmentation of their forest habitat by exhibiting a plastic feeding behavior, enabling them to use supplementary resources available in the agricultural matrix. This flexibility confers nutritional advantages to individuals with access to cultivated fields when their native food resources are depleted or decline in quality (e.g. during non-mast years) and may explain local heterogeneities in individual phenotypic quality.     

Synthesis of 4′-(Hydroxymethyl)Guanosine and a Phosphonate Analogue of Guanylic Acid

Abstract

The synthesis of 4′-(hydroxymethyl)guanosine (7) and the phosphonate analogue 8 of guanylic acid proceed from a common intermediate, 2′, 3′-O-isopropylidene-N ²-(monomethoxytrityl)-guanosine-5′-aldehyde (13).     

Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer

Wildlife populations are subjected to increasing pressure linked to human activities, which introduce multiple stressors. Recently, in addition to direct effects, it has been shown that indirect (non-lethal) effects of predation risk are predominant in many populations. Predation risk is often structured in space and time, generating a heterogeneous “landscape of fear” within which animals can minimize risks by modifying their habitat use. Furthermore, for ungulates, resource quality seems to be positively correlated with human-related sources of risk. We studied the trade-off between access to resources of high-quality and risk-taking by contrasting habitat use of roe deer during daytime with that during nighttime for 94 roe deer in a hunted population. Our first hypothesis was that roe deer should avoid human disturbance by modifying their habitat use during daytime compared to nighttime. Our results supported this, as roe deer mainly used open fields during nighttime, but used more forested habitats during daytime, when human disturbance is higher. Moreover, we found that diel patterns in habitat use were influenced by hunting disturbance. Indeed, the roe deer decreased their use of high-crops during daytime, an important source of cover and food, during the hunting season. The proximity of roads and dwellings also affected habitat use, since roe deer used open fields during daytime to a greater extent when the distance to these sources of disturbance was higher. Hence, our results suggest that roe deer resolve the trade-off between the acquisition of high-quality resources and risk avoidance by modifying their habitat use between day and night.