排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Rajendra Kumar Foolmaun Toolseeram Ramjeeawon 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2013,18(1):155-171
Purpose
Improper disposal of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles constitute an eyesore to the environmental landscape and is a threat to the flourishing tourism industry in Mauritius. It is therefore imperative to determine a suitable disposal method of used PET bottles which not only has the least environmental load but at the same time has minimum harmful impacts on peoples employed in waste disposal companies. In this respect, the present study investigated and compared the environmental and social impacts of four selected disposal alternatives of used PET bottles.Methods
Environmental impacts of the four disposal alternatives, namely: 100 % landfilling, 75 % incineration with energy recovery and 25 % landfilling, 40 % flake production (partial recycling) and 60 % landfilling and 75 % flake production and 25 % landfilling, were determined using ISO standardized life cycle assessment (ISO 14040:2006) and with the support of SimaPro 7.1 software. Social life cycle assessments were performed based on the UNEP/SETAC Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of products. Three stakeholder categories (worker, society and local community) and eight sub-category indicators (child labour, fair salary, forced labour, health and safety, social benefit/social security, discrimination, contribution to economic development and community engagement) were identified to be relevant to the study. A new method for aggregating and analysing the social inventory data is proposed and used to draw conclusions.Results and discussion
Environmental life cycle assessment results indicated that highest environmental impacts occurred when used PET bottles were disposed by 100 % landfilling while disposal by 75 % flake production and 25 % landfilling gave the least environmental load. Social life cycle assessment results indicated that least social impacts occurred with 75 % flake production and 25 % landfilling. Thus both E-LCA and S-LCA rated 75 % flake production and 25 % landfilling to be the best disposal option.Conclusions
Two dimensions of sustainability (environmental and social) when investigated using the Life Cycle Management tool, favoured scenario 4 (75 %?% flake production and 25 % landfilling) which is a partial recycling disposal route. One hundred percent landfilling was found out to be the worst scenario. The next step will be to explore the third pillar of sustainability, economic, and devise a method to integrate the three dimensions with a view to determine the sustainable disposal option of used PET bottles in Mauritius. 相似文献2.
Toolseeram?RamjeawonEmail author 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2004,9(4):254-260
Goal, Scope and Background Agricultural production includes not only crop production, but also food processing, transport, distribution, preparation,
and disposal. The effects of all these must be considered and controlled if the food chain is to be made sustainable. The
goal of this case study was to identify and review the significant areas of potential environmental impacts across the whole
life cycle of cane sugar on the island of Mauritius.
Methods The functional unit was one tonne of exported raw sugar from the island. The life cycle investigated includes the stage of
cane cultivation and harvest, cane burning, transport, fertilizer and herbicide manufacture, cane sugar manufacture and electricity
generation from bagasse. Data was gathered from companies, factories, sugar statistics, databases and literature. Energy depletion,
climate change, acidification, oxidant formation, nutrification, aquatic ecotoxicity and human toxicity were assessed.
Results and Discussion The inventory of the current sugar production system revealed that the production of one tonne of sugar requires, on average,
a land area of 0.12 ha, the application of 0.84 kg of herbicides and 16.5 kg of N-fertilizer, use of 553 tons of water and
170 tonne-km of transport services. The total energy consumption is about 14235 MJ per tonne of sugar, of which fossil fuel
consumption accounts for 1995 MJ and the rest is from renewable bagasse. 160 kg of CO2 per tonne of sugar is released from fossil fuel energy use and the net avoided emissions of CO2 on the island due to the use of bagasse as an energy source is 932,000 tonnes. 1.7 kg TSP, 1.21 kg SO2,1.26 kgNOxand 1.26 kg CO are emitted to the air per tonne of sugar produced. 1.7 kg N, 0.002 kg herbicide, 19.1 kg COD, 13.1 kgTSS and
0.37 kg PO4
3- are emitted to water per tonne of sugar produced. Cane cultivation and harvest accounts for the largest environmental impact
(44%) followed by fertilizer and herbicide manufacture (22%), sugar processing and electricity generation (20%), transportation
(13%) and cane burning (1%). Nutrification is the main impact followed by acidification and energy depletion.
Conclusions There are a number of options for improvement of the environmental performance of the cane-sugar production chain. Cane cultivation,
and fertilizer and herbicide manufacture, were hotspots for most of the impact categories investigated. Better irrigation
systems, precision farming, optimal use of herbicides, centralisation of sugar factories, implementation of co-generation
projects and pollution control during manufacturing and bagasse burning are measures that would considerably decrease resource
use and environmental impacts.
Recommendation and Outlook LCA was shown to be a valuable tool to assess the environmental impacts throughout the food production chain and to evaluate
government policies on agricultural production systems. 相似文献
3.
1