Origin of changes in electrical impedance during the growth and fermentation process of yeast in batch culture

The electrical impedance of the culture medium shows complex changes during the growth and fermentation process of yeast, and this prevents its possible application for the monitoring of certain yeast activities. Clarification of the mechanism of such changes is thus essential for practical use. As a first step toward this aim, the impedance, yeast concentration, and pH of a batch culture medium were measured using special cells with two compartments and also the usual type of cell with one compartment. In the special cells, the yeast was cultured in one compartment only. Conducting ions and nonconducting substances diffused through an intermediate porous membrane sandwiched between the two compartments. The impedances of the two compartments were measured simultaneously by the four-electrode method. The main mechanism responsible for increasing the impedance was the conducting ions produced by the yeast extract added as a nutrient to the culture broth by certain nonconducting substances during the process of growth. The increase in the yeast concentration was also a minor factor increasing the impedance. These increases surpassed the impedance decrease caused by the increase of H(+) ions produced by some accumulated acidic substances, and the impedance thus increased.     

Plasmid-encoded regulation of colicin E1 gene expression.

A plasmid-encoded factor that regulates the expression of the colicin E1 gene was found in molecular cloning experiments. The 2,294-base-pair AvaII fragment of the colicin E1 plasmid (ColE1) carrying the colicin E1 structural gene and the promoter-operator region had the same information with respect to the repressibility and inducibility of colicin E1 synthesis as the original ColE1 plasmid. An operon fusion was constructed between the 204-bp fragment containing the colicin E1 promoter-operator and xylE, the structural gene for catechol 2,3-dioxygenase encoded on the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida. The synthesis of the dioxygenase from the resulting plasmid occurred in recA+, but not in recA- cells and was derepressed in the recA lexA(Def) double mutant. These results indicate that the ColE1 plasmid has no repressor gene for colicin E1 synthesis and that the lexA protein functions as a repressor. Colicin E1 gene expression was adenosine 3',5'-phosphate (cAMP) dependent. Upon the removal of two PvuII fragments (2,000 bp in length) from the ColE1 plasmid, the induced synthesis of colicin E1 occurred in the adenylate-cyclase mutant even without cAMP. The 3,100-bp Tth111I fragment of the ColE1 plasmid cloned on pACYC177 restored the cAMP dependency of the deleted ColE1 plasmid. Since the deleted fragments correspond to the mobility region of ColE1, the cAMP dependency of the gene expression should be somehow related to the plasmid mobilization function.     

Weak Light-Induced Oxygen Consumption Observed during Photoreactivation Is Coupled to the Recovery of Oxygen Evolving Activity

During photoreactivation of the O₂-evolving center in Tris-inactivated/Mn-depletedthylakoids, a slow O₂-consumption occurred. This O₂-consumptionbecame detectable when the O₂-evolving activity of thylakoidswas inactivated by Tris-treatment and decreased as photoreactivationproceeded. The O₂-consumption and photoreactivation similarlyrequired Mn²⁺ at µM levels in addition to PSII electrondonors and shared severa common characteristics. Stimulationof O₂-consumption and photoreactivation by these cofactors werealways accompanied by enhancement in chlorophyll fluorescenceinduction, suggesting the involvement of a Mehler-type reactionin photoreactivation. Although the electron transport due tothis O₂-consumption was rapid enough to oxidize 4 Mn²⁺ ionsto reconstitute the tetranuclear Mn-cluster in each O₂-evolvingcenter in a few seconds, actual recovery of O₂-evolving activityoccurred more slowly in a few minutes. It was inferred thatphotoreactivation in Tris-inactivated thylakoids is not a simplephotooxidation of Mn2²⁺ but involves more complicated processeswhich are coupled to the Mehlertype electron transport fromPSII to oxygen via PSI. (Received July 11, 1994; Accepted August 23, 1996)     

Characterization of a monoclonal antibody that induces the acrosome reaction of sea urchin sperm

A monoclonal antibody, J18/29, induces the acrosome reaction (AR) in spermatozoa of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. J18/29 induces increases in both intracellular Ca2+ and intracellular pH similar to those occurring upon induction of the AR by the natural inducer, the fucose sulfate-rich glycoconjugate of egg jelly. Lowering the Ca2+ concentration or the pH of the seawater inhibits the J18/29-induced AR, as does treatment with Co2+, an inhibitor of Ca2+ channels. The J18/29-induced AR is also inhibited by verapamil, tetraethylammonium chloride, and elevated K+. All these treatments cause similar inhibition of the egg jelly-induced AR. J18/29 reacts with a group of membrane proteins ranging in molecular mass from 340 to 25 kD, as shown by immunoprecipitation of lysates of 125I-labeled sperm and Western blots. The most prominent reacting proteins are of molecular masses of 320, 240, 170, and 58 kD. The basis of the multiple reactivity appears to reside in the polypeptide chains of these proteins, as J18/29 binding is sensitive to protease digestion but resistant to periodate oxidation. There are approximately 570,000 sites per cell for J18/29 binding. J18/29 is the only reagent of known binding specificity that induces the AR; it identifies a subset of sperm membrane proteins whose individual characterization may lead to the isolation of the receptors involved in the triggering of the AR at fertilization.     

Transfer of chromosomal material. Association of rescuable sarcoma virus genome with chromosomal fraction

An attempt was made to transfer the murine sarcoma virus genome from cryptically transformed HT-1 cells to hamster embryo cells via isolated chromosomes (chromosome immigration). Chromosome immigration did not result in any transformation of recipient embryo cells. However, there was transfer of a rescuable sarcoma virus genome. Evidence indicates that the transfer requires the intact chromosome structure. It was not possible to identify one or any chromosome associated with the rescuable sarcoma genome.