Stridulation and hearing in the noctuid mothThecophora fovea (Tr.)

Summary MaleThecophora fovea (Tr.) (Noctuidae) sing continuously for several minutes by rubbing the 1. tarsal segment of the metathoracic leg against a stridulatory swelling on the hindwing. In Northern Yugoslavia (Slovenia) the males emerge in late October and start stridulating about a week later when the females emerge.The sounds are pulse trains consisting of 10–12 ms long sound pulses with main energy around 32 kHz and a PRR of 20 pulses/s. The mechanics of the sound producing apparatus was studied by activating the stridulatory swelling with short sound impulses. The impulse response of the swelling was recorded by laser vibrometry and amplitude spectra of the vibrations showed maximum velocities between 25 and 35 kHz. Hence, it seems likely that the stridulatory swelling is driven as a mechanical oscillator with a resonance frequency which determines the carrier frequency of the sounds.Audiograms of both males and females showed peak sensitivities at 25–30 kHz. The median threshold at the BF was 36 dB SPL. The peak intensity of the sound pulses was 83 dB SPL at 1 m, which should enable the moths to hear each other at distances of around 30 m. Therefore sound production inT. fovea might function in long distance calling. It is argued thatT. fovea can survive making such a noise in spite of being palatable to bats because it flies so late in the year that it is temporally isolated from bats.Abbreviations PRR pulse repetition rate - SPL sound pressure level - BF best frequency     

Detection of sonar signals in the presence of pulses of masking noise by the echolocating bat,Eptesicus fuscus

Summary Two big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) were trained to report the presence or absence of a virtual sonar target. The bats' sensitivity to transient masking was investigated by adding 5 ms pulses of white noise delayed from 0 to 16 ms relative to the target echo. When signal and masker occurred simultaneously, the bats required a signal energy to noise spectrum level ratio of 35 dB for 50% probability of detection. When the masker was delayed by 2 ms or more there was no significant masking and echo energy could be reduced by 30 dB for the same probability of detection. The average duration of the most energetic sonar signal of each trial was measured to be 1.7 ms and 2.4 ms for the two bats, but a simple relation between detection performance and pulse duration was not found.In a different experiment the masking noise pulses coincided with the echo, and the duration of the masker was varied from 2 to 37.5 ms. The duration of the masker had little or no effect on the probability of detection.The findings are consistent with an aural integration time constant of about 2 ms, which is comparable to the duration of the cries. This is an order of magnitude less than found in backward masking experiments with humans and may be an adaptation to the special constraints of echolocation. The short time of sensitivity to masking may indicate that the broad band clicks of arctiid moths produced as a countermeasure to bat predation are unlikely to function by masking the echo of the moth.Abbreviations SPL sound pressure level - SD standard deviation - SE standard error - BW bandwidth     

Integration time for short broad band clicks in echolocating FM-bats (Eptesicus fuscus)

Vespertilionid FM-bats (four Eptesicus fuscus and one Vespertilio murinus) were trained in an electronic phantom target simulator to detect synthetic echoes consisting of either one or two clicks. The threshold sound pressure for single clicks was around 47 dB peSPL for all five bats corresponding to a threshold energy of -95 dB re 1 Pa² * s. By varying the interclick interval, T, for double clicks it was shown that the threshold intensity was around — 3 dB relative to the threshold for single clicks at T up to 2.4 ms, indicating perfect power summation of both clicks. A threshold shift of -13.5 dB for a 1 ms train of 20 clicks (0.05 ms interclick interval) confirmed that the bats integrated the power of the stimuli. At T longer than around 2.5 ms the threshold for double clicks was the same as for single clicks. Thus, the bats performed like perfect energy detectors with an integration time of approximately 2.4 ms. This integration time is an order of magnitude shorter than that reported for bats listening passively for pure tones. In our setup the bats emitted sonar signals with durations of 2–3 ms. Hence, the results may indicate that while echolocating the bats integration time is adapted to the duration of the sonar emissions.Abbreviations AGC automatic gain control - FM frequency modulated - peSPL peak equivalent sound pressure level - rms root mean square - SD standard deviation - SE standard error of mean - T interclick interval     

Active listening for spatial orientation in a complex auditory scene

To successfully negotiate a complex environment, an animal must control the timing of motor behaviors in coordination with dynamic sensory information. Here, we report on adaptive temporal control of vocal–motor behavior in an echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus, as it captured tethered insects close to background vegetation. Recordings of the bat's sonar vocalizations were synchronized with high-speed video images that were used to reconstruct the bat's three-dimensional flight path and the positions of target and vegetation. When the bat encountered the difficult task of taking insects as close as 10–20 cm from the vegetation, its behavior changed significantly from that under open room conditions. Its success rate decreased by about 50%, its time to initiate interception increased by a factor of ten, and its high repetition rate “terminal buzz” decreased in duration by a factor of three. Under all conditions, the bat produced prominent sonar “strobe groups,” clusters of echolocation pulses with stable intervals. In the final stages of insect capture, the bat produced strobe groups at a higher incidence when the insect was positioned near clutter. Strobe groups occurred at all phases of the wingbeat (and inferred respiration) cycle, challenging the hypothesis of strict synchronization between respiration and sound production in echolocating bats. The results of this study provide a clear demonstration of temporal vocal–motor control that directly impacts the signals used for perception.     

Frequency alternation and an offbeat rhythm indicate foraging behavior in the echolocating bat, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Saccopteryx bilineata</Emphasis>

The greater sac-winged bat, Saccopteryx bilineata (Emballonuridae), uses two distinct echolocation call sequences: a ‘monotonous’ sequence, where bats emit ~48 kHz calls at a relatively stable rate, and a frequency-alternating sequence, where bats emit calls at ~45 kHz (low-note call) and ~48 kHz (high-note call). The frequencies of these low–high-note pairs remain stable within sequences. In Panama, we recorded echolocation calls from S. bilineata with a multi-microphone array at two sites: one a known roosting site, the other a known foraging site. Our results indicate that this species (1) only produces monotonous sequences in non-foraging contexts and, at times, directly after emitting a feeding buzz and (2) produces frequency-alternating sequences when actively foraging. These latter sequences are also characterized by an unusual, offbeat emission rhythm. We found significant positive relationships between (1) call intensity and call duration and (2) call intensity and distance from clutter. However, these relationships were weaker than those reported for bats from other families. We speculate on how call frequency alternation and an offbeat emission rhythm might reflect a novel strategy for prey detection at the edge of complex habitat in this ancient family of bats.     

Target ranging and the role of time-frequency structure of synthetic echoes in big brown bats,Eptesicus fuscus

Summary Echolocating bats judge the distance to a target on basis of the delay between the emitted cry and the returning echo. In a phantom echo set-up it was investigated how changes in the time-frequency structure of synthetic echoes affect ranging accuracy of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.A one channel phantom target simulator and a Y/N paradigm was used. Five Eptesicus fuscus were trained to discriminate between phantom targets with different virtual distances (delays). The phantom echo was stored in a memory and broadcast from a loudspeaker after a certain delay following the bat's triggering of the system via a trigger microphone. The ranging accuracy was compared using 5 different signals with equal energy as phantom echoes: a standard cry (a natural bat cry), two kinds of noise signals, a high pass, and a low pass filtered version of the standard cry.The standard cry was recorded from one of the bats while judging the distance to a real target. The duration was 1.1 ms, the first harmonic swept down from 55 to 25 kHz and there was energy also in the second and third harmonic. Both noise signals had the same duration, power spectrum, and energy as the standard cry. One noise signal was stored in a memory and hence was exactly the same each time the bat triggered the system. The other variable noise signal was produced by storing the envelope of the standard cry and multiplying on-line with band pass filtered noise. The time-frequency structure (e.g. rise time) of this noise signal changed from triggering to triggering. The filtered signals were produced by either 40 kHz high pass or 40 kHz low pass filtering of the standard cry.The range difference thresholds for the 5 bats were around 1–2 cm (51–119 us) using the standard cry as echo. The range difference threshold with both noise signals was 7–8 cm (around 450 s delay difference). The 40 kHz high pass filtered cry increased the threshold to approximately twice the threshold with the standard cry. With the 40 kHz low pass filtered cry the threshold was increased 2.5–3 times relative to the threshold with the standard cry. A single bat was tested with a signal filtered with a 55 kHz low pass filter leaving the whole first harmonic. The threshold was the same as that with the standard signal.The reduced ranging accuracy with the filtered signals indicates that the full band width of the first harmonic is utilised for ranging by the bats. The substantial reduction in accuracy with the noise signals indicates that not only the full band width but also the orderly time-frequency structure (the FM sweep) of the cry is important for ranging in echolocating bats.Abbreviations FM frequency modulated - CF constant frequency - peSPL peak equivalent sound pressure level - SD standard deviation - SE standard error of mean - EPROM erasable programmable read only memory - FFT fast Fourier transform - S/N signal-to-noise ratio     

THE CLICK-SOUNDS OF NARWHALS (MONODON MONOCEROS) IN INGLEFIELD BAY, NORTHWEST GREENLAND

We studied the sounds of narwhals ( Monodon monoceros ) foraging in the open waters in Northwest Greenland. We used a linear, vertical array of three hydrophones (depth 10 m, 30 m, 100 m) with a fourth hydrophone (depth 30 m) about 20 m from the vertical array. A smaller fifth hydrophone (depth 2 m) allowed for registering frequencies up to 125 kHz (± 2 dB) when signals were recorded at 762 mm/set on an instrumentation tape recorder. Clicks were the prevalent signals, but we heard whistles occasionally. We separated the clicks into two classes: click trains that had rates of 3-10 clicks/sec and click bursts having rates of 110-150 clicks/sec. The spectra of train clicks had maximum amplitudes at 48 ± 10 kHz and a duration of 29 ± 6 psec. The spectra of burst clicks had maximum amplitudes at 19 ± 1 kHz and a duration of 40 ± 3 psec. By analogy with other dolphin species, narwhals presumably use the clicks for echolocation during orientation and for locating prey. The narwhal click patterns resemble those of insectivorous bats. Click trains might correspond to bat searching signals and click bursts to the bat's terminal "buzz", emitted just before prey capture.     

The echolocation and hunting behavior of the bat,Pipistrellus kuhli

Summary The echolocation and hunting behavior ofPipistrellus kuhli was studied in the field using multi-exposure photography synchronized with high-speed tape recordings. During the search phase, the bats used 8–12 ms signals with sweeps (sweep width 3–6 kHz) and pulse intervals near 100 ms or less often near 200 ms (Figs. 1 and 2). The bats seemed to have individual terminal frequencies that could lie between 35 and 40 kHz. The duty cycle of searching signals was about 8%. The flight speed of hunting bats was between 4.0 and 4.5 m/s. The bats reacted to insect prey at distances of about 70 to 120 cm. Given the flight speed, the detection distance was estimated to about 110 to 160 cm. Following detection the bat went into the approach phase where the FM sweep steepened (to about 60 kHz bandwidth) and the repetition rate increased (to about 30 Hz). The terminal phase or buzz, which indicates prey capture (or attempted capture), was composed of two sections. The first section contained signals similar to those in the approach phase except that the pulse duration decreased and the repetition rate increased. The second section was characterized by a sharp drop in the terminal frequency (to about 20 kHz) and by very short pulses (0.3 ms) at rates of up to 200 Hz (Figs. 1 and 3). Near the beginning of the buzz the bat prepared for capturing the prey by extending the wings and forming a tail pouch (Fig. 4). A pause of about 100 ms in sound emission after the buzz indicated a successful capture (Fig. 4). Pulse duration is discussed in relation to glint detection and detection distance. It is argued that the minimum detection distance can be estimated from the pulse duration as the distance where pulse-echo overlap is avoided.Abbreviations CF constant frequency - FM frequency modulated