The Effect of the pH of Meat on the Boiling Test

The effect of the pH on the boiling test was studied in 68 beef and 108 pork muscles. The pH had a significant effect on the sensory scores obtained from the boiling test. The effect was particularly pronounced in the odour of meat. In beef the odour scores remain steady for samples with a pH value under about 6.2 and start to increase rapidly in higher pH values. In pork the increase in scores appears to be linear. The odour observed in high pH meat was described by the judges as abnormal and ammonialike. In the case of meat with a high pH, the results of the boiling test at meat inspection should be interpreted with extreme caution.     

Comparison of Different Agar Diffusion Methods for the Detection of Antimicrobial Residues in Slaughter Animals

The different agar diffusion methods were compared using antibiotic and sulphonamide-impregnated filter-paper discs and the kidneys of healthy and emergency-slaughtered pigs and cows after slaughter. No method used seemed to be sensitive to all antimicrobial drugs preimpregnated onto discs. Tetracycline yielded a greater zone of inhibition at pH 6 than at pH 8 and aminoglycosides, erythromycin, polymyxin B and lin cornycin at pH 8 than at pH 6. It therefore seems necessary to use different pHs (6 and 8). The addition of trimethoprim to the medium is necessary for the detection of sulphonamides. Bacillus subtilis BGA used as the test organism was more sensitive to sulphonamides on the “Test agar for the inhibitor test” containing trimethoprim than on the “Iso-Sensitest agar” also containing trimethoprim. The addition of trimethoprim to “Test agar for the inhibitor test” is recommended at pH 8 but not at pH 6 because false-positive cases (with inhibition zones > 2 mm) were observed at pH 6 with trimethoprim on the kidneys of healthy pigs.     

Comparison of Different pH Measurement Methods in Meat

The accuracy of portable pH meters and the nitrazine yellow method was compared with the reference method by determining the pH of 74 beef and 96 pork muscles. The pH was measured directly from the muscle. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between the different electrometric combinations. Combinations of portable pH meters with puncture electrodes gave systematically higher pH values than the reference method. These differences were not very large but they may be of practical significance. The use of a piercing cover on the electrode to help the insertion of the electrode into the meat is not recommended, since it may cause a rise in pH values. Electrometric methods were found to be more precise than the nitrazine yellow method. On the basis of these findings there still is a need of further harmonization of the methods used for pH measurement of meat.