Demonstration that a chemically synthesized BPV1 oncoprotein and its C-terminal domain function to induce cellular DNA synthesis

Bovine papillomavirus type 1 contains the smallest known oncogene (ORF E5), encoding a hydrophobic 44 amino acid protein. To study the biochemical functions of the E5 oncoprotein, we have chemically synthesized it and several deletion mutant peptides. We demonstrate induction of cellular DNA synthesis in growth-arrested cells by microinjection of E5 oncoprotein. This activity can be broken down into two functionally distinguishable domains. Remarkably, the first domain, which alone is sufficient to induce cellular DNA synthesis, contains only the C-terminal 13 amino acids. This is the smallest known protein fragment that can autonomously activate cellular DNA synthesis. The second domain is the hydrophobic middle region, which by itself fails to induce cellular DNA synthesis but confers a 1000-fold increase in specific activity. The N-terminal one-third of the molecule is dispensable for induction of DNA synthesis.     

Procedure and Analysis of a Useful Method in Determining Mycelial Dry Weights from Agar Plates

The evaluation of growth by dry weight determination of fungus mycelium for agar plates was examined. The data obtained were statistically analyzed. This method was shown to be sufficiently accurate to be used as an investigative tool.     

Protonic and cationic changes during cyclical cation transport driven by electron transfer

A method is described for the subcellular fractionation of goldfish xanthophores. The procedure produces relatively pure fractions of caroteniod droplets, pterinosomes, cytosol and what appears to be plasma membrane. The presence of a distinct pattern of proteins is shown to be associated with the carotenoid droplets. Treatment of the xanthophores with ACTH affects the buoyant density of some carotenoid droplets and stimulates the phosphorylation of a polypeptide associated with the carotenoid droplets.     

How Multidisciplinary Are the Multidisciplinary Journals Science and Nature?

Interest in cross-disciplinary research knowledge interchange runs high. Review processes at funding agencies, such as the U.S. National Science Foundation, consider plans to disseminate research across disciplinary bounds. Publication in the leading multidisciplinary journals, Nature and Science, may signify the epitome of successful interdisciplinary integration of research knowledge and cross-disciplinary dissemination of findings. But how interdisciplinary are they? The journals are multidisciplinary, but do the individual articles themselves draw upon multiple fields of knowledge and does their influence span disciplines? This research compares articles in three fields (Cell Biology, Physical Chemistry, and Cognitive Science) published in a leading disciplinary journal in each field to those published in Nature and Science. We find comparable degrees of interdisciplinary integration and only modest differences in cross-disciplinary diffusion. That said, though the rate of out-of-field diffusion might be comparable, the sheer reach of Nature and Science, indicated by their potent Journal Impact Factors, means that the diffusion of knowledge therein can far exceed that of leading disciplinary journals in some fields (such as Physical Chemistry and Cognitive Science in our samples).