Pathogenesis of pulmonary edema associated with the adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Pulmonary edema is common cause of acute respiratory failure and can be seen in not only cardiac but also noncardiac diseases. The pathophysiologic mechanism for the development of acute pulmonary edema in any clinical situation can usually be explained alterations in the forces governing the transvascular flux of fluid in the pulmonary microvasculature, according to the Starling equation. "Cardiac" pulmonary edema is primarily due to an increase in the capillary hydrostatic pressure of sufficient magnitude to overcome the forces maintaining fluid within the vessel and the ability of the lymphatics to drain the transudated fluid. On the other hand, pulmonary edema occurring in association with noncardiac disease (e.g., sepsis, aspiration or shock) is secondary to an increase in the permeability of the pulmonary microvasculature and is referred to as noncardiogenic pulmonary edema or the adult respiratory distress syndrome. This article examines the mechanisms for the development of pulmonary edema and discusses the differences between the cardiac and noncardiac types.     

Extraction buffer effects on detection of transient gene expression in white spruce

β-Glucuronidase (GUS) and luciferase (LUC) reporter genes were introduced into white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) cultured cells via particle bombardment. Transient expression of these genes was evaluated by extracting the enzymes using 3 buffers. Different buffers resulted in significantly different sensitivities of GUS and LUC detection. In the case of cobombardment, the buffer that gave high levels of expression of one reporter gene did not necessarily result in a better detection of the second reporter gene. This study indicates that appropriate buffers should be used for maximum detection of reporter genes.     

Diaspirin cross-linked Hb and norepinephrine prevent the sepsis-induced increase in critical O(2) delivery

We hypothesized that support of arterial perfusion pressure with diaspirin cross-linked Hb (DCLHb) would prevent the sepsis-induced attenuation in the systemic O(2) delivery-O(2) uptake relationship. Awake septic rats were treated with a chronic infusion of DCLHb or a reference treatment [norepinephrine (NE)] to increase mean arterial pressure by 10-20% over 18 h. Septic and sham control groups received normal saline. Isovolemic hemodilution to create anemic hypoxia was then performed in a metabolic box during continuous measurement of systemic O(2) uptake. O(2) delivery was calculated from hemodynamic variables, and the critical point of O(2) delivery (DO(2 crit)) was determined using piecewise regression analysis of the O(2) delivery-O(2) uptake relationship. Sepsis increased DO(2 crit) from 4.99 +/- 0.17 to 6.69 +/- 0.42 ml x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) (P < 0.01), while O(2) extraction capacity was decreased (P < 0.05). DCLHb and NE infusion prevented the sepsis-induced increase in DO(2 crit) [4.56 +/- 0.42 ml x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) (P < 0.01) and 5.04 +/- 0.56 ml x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) (P < 0.05), respectively]. This was explained by a 59% increase in O(2) extraction capacity in the DCLHb group compared with septic controls (P < 0.05), whereas NE treatment decreased systemic O(2) uptake in anemic hypoxia (1.51 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.1 ml x min(-1) x 100 g(-1) in septic controls, P < 0.05). We conclude that DCLHb ameliorated O(2) extraction capacity in the septic microcirculation, whereas NE decreased the metabolic demands of the tissues.     

Tool for Rapid & Easy Identification of High Risk Diabetic Foot: Validation & Clinical Pilot of the Simplified 60 Second Diabetic Foot Screening Tool

Background

Most diabetic foot amputations are caused by ulcers on the skin of the foot i.e. diabetic foot ulcers. Early identification of patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulcers is crucial. The ‘Simplified 60-Second Diabetic Foot Screening Tool’ has been designed to rapidly detect high risk diabetic feet, allowing for timely identification and referral of patients needing treatment. This study aimed to determine the clinical performance and inter-rater reliability of ‘Simplified 60 Second Diabetic Foot Screening Tool’ in order to evaluate its applicability for routine screening.

Methods and Findings

The tool was independently tested by n=12 assessors with n=18 Guyanese patients with diabetes. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha for each of the assessment items. A minimum value of 0.60 was considered acceptable. Reliability scores of the screening tool assessment items were: ‘monofilament test’ 0.98; ‘active ulcer’ 0.97; ‘previous amputation’ 0.97; ‘previous ulcer’ 0.97; ‘fixed ankle’ 0.91; ‘deformity’ 0.87; ‘callus’ 0.87; ‘absent pulses’ 0.87; ‘fixed toe’ 0.80; ‘blisters’ 0.77; ‘ingrown nail’ 0.72; and ‘fissures’ 0.55. The item ‘stiffness in the toe or ankle’ was removed as it was observed in only 1.3% of patients. The item ‘fissures’ was also removed due to low inter-rater reliability. Clinical performance was assessed via a pilot study utilizing the screening tool on n=1,266 patients in an acute care setting in Georgetown, Guyana. In total, 48% of patients either had existing diabetic foot ulcers or were found to be at high risk for developing ulcers.

Conclusions

Clinicians in low and middle income countries such as Guyana can use the Simplified 60-Second Diabetic Screening Tool to facilitate early detection and appropriate treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Implementation of this screening tool has the potential to decrease diabetes related disability and mortality.