From Aggregation to Dispersion: How Habitat Fragmentation Prevents the Emergence of Consensual Decision Making in a Group

In fragmented landscape, individuals have to cope with the fragmentation level in order to aggregate in the same patch and take advantage of group-living. Aggregation results from responses to environmental heterogeneities and/or positive influence of the presence of congeners. In this context, the fragmentation of resting sites highlights how individuals make a compromise between two individual preferences: (1) being aggregated with conspecifics and (2) having access to these resting sites. As in previous studies, when the carrying capacity of available resting sites is large enough to contain the entire group, a single aggregation site is collectively selected. In this study, we have uncoupled fragmentation and habitat loss: the population size and total surface of the resting sites are maintained at a constant value, an increase in fragmentation implies a decrease in the carrying capacity of each shelter. For our model organism, Blattella germanica, our experimental and theoretical approach shows that, for low fragmentation level, a single resting site is collectively selected. However, for higher level of fragmentation, individuals are randomly distributed between fragments and the total sheltered population decreases. In the latter case, social amplification process is not activated and consequently, consensual decision making cannot emerge and the distribution of individuals among sites is only driven by their individual propensity to find a site. This intimate relation between aggregation pattern and landscape patchiness described in our theoretical model is generic for several gregarious species. We expect that any group-living species showing the same structure of interactions should present the same type of dispersion-aggregation response to fragmentation regardless of their level of social complexity.     

How brood influences caste aggregation patterns in the dimorphic ant species Pheidole pallidula

Spatial distribution of ant workers and, notably their aggregation/segregation behaviour, is a key-element of the colony social organization contributing to the efficiency of task performance and division of labour. In polymorphic species, specialized worker castes notably differ in their intrinsic aggregation behaviour. In this context, knowing the preponderant role of minors in brood care, we investigate how a stimulus such as brood can influence the spatial patterns of Pheidole pallidula worker castes. In a homogeneous area without brood, it was shown that minors display only a low level of aggregation while majors form large clusters in the central area. Here we find out that these aggregation patterns of both minors and majors can be deeply influenced by the presence of brood. For minors, it nucleates or enhances the formation of a large stable cluster. Such high sensitivity of minors to brood stimuli fits well with their role as main brood tenders in the colony. For majors, interattraction between individuals still remains the prevailing aggregation factor while brood strongly influences the localisation of their cluster. We discuss how the balance between interattraction and sensitivity to environmental stimuli determines the mobility of each worker castes and, consequently, the availability of minors and majors to participate in everyday colony tasks. Moreover, we will evoke the functional value of majors’ cluster location close to the brood, namely with respect to social regulation of the colony caste ratio. Received 30 May 2005; revised 11 January 2006; accepted 13 January 2006.     

Spatial organization in a dimorphic ant: caste specificity of clustering patterns and area marking

Living in groups constitutes the root of social organizationin animals. Likewise, the spatial aggregation between membersof insects societies plays a crucial role in social cohesionand division of labor, namely, in polymorphic ant species. Inthe present paper, we show caste-specific aggregation patternsin the strictly dimorphic Pheidole pallidula ant species. Weinvestigate the influence on the clustering of ants exertedby direct contacts between nest mates as well as by indirectcues through chemical marking. In a homogeneous environmentdeprived of chemical cues, majors show a higher aggregationlevel than minors and a centripetal behavior. By contrast, minorsare more scattered in the experimental arena and display a centrifugalbehavior. In addition, area marking laid by minors enhancestheir own aggregative behavior while contributing to the localizationof the spontaneously aggregating majors. Such differences inaggregative patterns as well as their adaptive value have tobe coupled with the mobility level and the task performanceefficiency of each worker caste. Contrary to majors that arelikely to aggregate, highly mobile minors, scattered insideand outside the nest colony, can detect colony needs and cancarry out most of the daily tasks for which they are more efficientthan majors.     

Group personality during collective decision-making: a multi-level approach

Collective decision-making processes emerge from social feedback networks within a group. Many studies on collective behaviour underestimate the role of individual personality and, as a result, personality is rarely analysed in the context of collective dynamics. Here, we show evidence of sheltering behaviour personality in a gregarious insect (Periplaneta americana), which is characterized by a collective personality at the group level. We also highlight that the individuals within groups exhibited consistent personality traits in their probability of sheltering and total time sheltered during the three trials over one week. Moreover, the group personality, which arises from the synergy between the distribution of behaviour profiles in the group and social amplifications, affected the sheltering dynamics. However, owing to its robustness, personality did not affect the group probability of reaching a consensus. Finally, to prove social interactions, we developed a new statistical method that will be helpful for future research on personality traits and group behaviour. This approach will help to identify the circumstances under which particular group compositions may improve the fitness of individuals in gregarious species.     

Group living enhances individual resources discrimination: the use of public information by cockroaches to assess shelter quality

In group-living organisms, consensual decision of site selection results from the interplay between individual responses to site characteristics and to group-members. Individuals independently gather personal information by exploring their environment. Through social interaction, the presence of others provides public information that could be used by individuals and modulates the individual probability of joining/leaving a site. The way that individual's information processing and the network of interactions influence the dynamics of public information (depending on population size) that in turn affect discrimination in site quality is a central question. Using binary choice between sheltering sites of different quality, we demonstrate that cockroaches in group dramatically outperform the problem-solving ability of single individual. Such use of public information allows animals to discriminate between alternatives whereas isolated individuals are ineffective (i.e. the personal discrimination efficiency is weak). Our theoretical results, obtained from a mathematical model based on behavioral rules derived from experiments, highlight that the collective discrimination emerges from competing amplification processes relying on the modulation of the individual sheltering time without shelters comparison and communication modulation. Finally, we well demonstrated here the adaptive value of such decision algorithm. Without any behavioral change, the system is able to shift to a more effective strategy when alternatives are present: the modification of the spatio-temporal distributions of individuals leading to the collective selection of the best resource. This collective discrimination implying such parsimonious and widespread mechanism must be shared by many group living-species.     

How does starvation affect spatial organization within nests in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lasius niger</Emphasis>?

Spatial distribution of ant workers within the nest is a key element of the colony social organization contributing to the efficiency of task performance and division of labour. Spatial distribution must be efficiently organized when ants are highly starved and have to get food rapidly. By studying ants’ behaviour within the nest during the beginning of food recruitment, this study demonstrates how the spatial organization is affected by starvation and improves the efficiency and the speed of recruitment as well as the allocation of food. (1) In starved nests, nestmates left the deep part of the nest and crowded near the nest entrance. This modification of the spatial distribution is a local phenomenon concerning only the individuals situated in the first chamber near the nest entrance. These starved individuals have a higher probability of leaving the nest after a contact with recruiters than nestmates situated deeper in the nest. This strongly suggests that nestmates situated near the nest entrance have a low response threshold to the signals emitted by recruiters. Their higher responsiveness speeds up their exit to the foraging area and hence may increase the efficiency of highly starved colonies in exploiting new food opportunities. (2) In starved nests, the trajectory covered by recruiters between contacts with nestmates was nearly twice as small. For recruiters, this represented a gain of time in the allocation of food. As the recruitment process follows snowball dynamics, this gain of time by starved recruiters might also speed up the exploitation of food. This study evidences how the spatial distribution of individuals as a function of their motivational state might have a regulatory function in the recruitment process, which should be generic for many social species.     

Self-amplification as a source of interindividual variability: Shelter selection in cockroaches

Although group effect and collective decisions have been described in many insect species, the behavioral mechanisms involved in the process remain poorly documented at the individual level. We examined how individual behavior depends on the environmental context and we precisely characterized the behavioral rules leading to settlement of individual cockroaches in resting site. We focused on the spatial and temporal distribution of individuals in absence of conspecifics. Using isolated adult males of the cockroach Periplaneta americana, we showed that the quality of resting sites and the duration of the settlement exerted an influence on the individual decision-making: the probability of leaving a resting site decreased with the time spent under a shelter. A numerical model derived from experimental data suggested that this simple rule of self-amplification can also account for the interindividual variability.     

Complex Dynamics Based on a Quorum: Decision-Making Process by Cockroaches in a Patchy Environment

In the absence of complex communication and a global knowledge of the environment, cockroaches are able to assess the availability of resources and to reach a consensual decision: the group aggregates in a single resting site. We show that the aggregation dynamics and the collective shelter selection of cockroaches are influenced by their social context as, unlike single individuals, groups of cockroaches are more likely to respond to environmental heterogeneities. The decision of individuals to stay under a shelter relies on the modulation of their resting time, according to the perception of two local cues: (1) the shelters luminosity and (2) the number of congeners. This study on the cockroach species Periplaneta americana highlights a shelter-selection mechanism based on an amplification process resulting from the interactions between congeners. This mechanism leads to complex spatiotemporal aggregation dynamics characterized by transient bimodality, bifurcation patterns (shelter selection) and the existence of a quorum size in the settlement behaviour of the cockroaches. Finally, we discuss the generic aspect for other gregarious species of the collective decision-making process demonstrated for cockroaches.