C-Type Virus Released from Cultured Human Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells

RD-114 virus, released from human rhabdomyosarcoma cells, has all the characteristics of a mammalian C-type virus. Immunological tests indicate that it differs from all known C-type viruses and is the most likely candidate for a human C-type virus yet described.     

Presence of Sarcoma Genome in a “Non-infectious” Mammalian Virus

Virus particles, antigenically related to mouse sarcoma virus, can be induced from hamster tumour cells. They are “defective” in their failure to replicate in or transform hamster, mouse or rat cells, although they contain viral-specific RNA and, with “helper” mouse leukaemia virus, show sarcomagenic activity.     

Feline Leukaemia Viral Antigens and Antisera to the Group Specific Antigens of the Murine Leukaemia Viruses

GEERING et al.¹ reported that feline leukaemia viruses shared one of the group specific antigens of the murine leukaemia viruses, gs-3, as detected by immunoprecipitation in agar gels with broadly reactive rat antisera to the group specific antigens of the murine leukaemia viruses (MuLV). Subsequently, they found that this shared group specific antigen was also present in the hamster and rat C-type viruses². Work by Schafer³ and our own immunodiffusion⁴ and complement fixation studies have confirmed the immunological reactivity between the feline leukaemia viral antigens and broad-reacting murine leukaemia group specific antisera. We have now applied this interspecies immunological reaction between the murine and feline C-type viruses to quantitative studies of the feline leukaemia viruses. Broad-reactive murine leukaemia-sarcoma group specific antisera prepared in rats by the induction of murine sarcoma virus (MSV) tumours^{5, 6} were found to be as useful and nearly as sensitive as a feline leukaemia-sarcoma specific, group specific antiserum for the in vitro detection and assay of the noncytopathogenic feline leukaemia virus (FeLV).     

Benefits,costs and reactivity of inducible defences: an experimental test with rotifers

1. A key aspect of the ecology and evolution of adaptive prey responses to predator risk is the timing by which the former develop a defensive trait in response to inducing signals released by the latter. This property, called reactivity, has been shown to affect population stability and persistence. 2. Theoretically, the minimal predator density required by prey to exhibit induced defences is expected to increase with the effectiveness of the defence and decrease with its cost. Likewise, the time required for the prey population to exhibit an induced defence is expected to increase together with cost. 3. The freshwater rotifers Brachionus calyciflorus and B. havanaensis and their predator Asplanchna brightwelli were used to test the hypothesis that prey species exhibiting defences that offer a larger fitness benefit and lower fitness cost are more reactive to predator signals, in terms of requiring shorter exposure time and lower signal concentration to trigger a morphological defence reaction. 4. Our results showed that both prey species exhibited costly and effective defences after induction by predator infochemicals. Faster reactions were observed at higher levels of predator cues. Nevertheless, the observed relationship between reactivity and benefit/cost of defences did not agree with our expectations. 5. To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the timing of induction of morphological defences is experimentally assessed over a gradient of risk signals. We propose new research directions to disentangle the mechanisms and project the consequences of prey decisions at the morphological level.