The impact of a fox‐ and cat‐free safe haven on the bird fauna of remnant vegetation in southwestern Australia

Introduced predators are a serious threat to Australian vertebrates. However, the consequences of predation for an area's avifauna have rarely been quantified. We took advantage of the establishment of a 7,832 ha fox‐ and cat‐free safe haven at Mt Gibson, in Western Australia, to assess the consequences of excluding introduced mammal predators on the bird fauna. Bird surveys were conducted over 6 years, before and after the establishment of the introduced predator‐free safe haven. After 3 years, half the sites were enclosed by the fence that excluded introduced predators, while the remainder of sites remained outside the fence and were exposed to fox and cat activity. The sites were stratified by four major vegetation types. A total of 91 bird species were variously detectable with the survey approach, but were typically more detectable during morning surveys. Site occupancy varied considerably among species, but overall, occupancy by all species was most likely to be either not impacted or positively impacted by the safe haven. The most notable change was that avifaunal richness appeared to increase in woodland and shrubland habitats within, as compared to outside, the safe haven. We conclude that: (1) the safe haven had an overall positive impact on bird occupancy; and (2) there were no consistent trends with respect to the kinds of species whose occupancy was positively impacted, beyond them all being small‐ to medium‐sized birds and mostly insectivorous. However, these conclusions must be tempered by the poor detection probability of many species.     

Publisher Correction: Risk screening of the potential invasiveness of non-native aquatic species in Vietnam

Biological Invasions - A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02498-4     

Risk screening of the potential invasiveness of non-native aquatic species in Vietnam

Biological Invasions - The impact of non-native species, together with their pervasiveness, necessitates a means of identifying which species are most likely to pose an elevated risk of becoming...     

Removal and eradication of introduced species in a fenced reserve: Quantifying effort,costs and results

Given the difficulty of effective landscape‐scale control of introduced predators, fenced areas that exclude them (i.e. ‘mainland islands') can play an important role in conserving threatened mammal species in Australia. Despite this, the effort required to eradicate or remove introduced species from within fenced areas remains poorly quantified. This study was conducted at Mt Gibson Wildlife Sanctuary in semi‐arid Western Australia, where a 43 km predator‐exclusion fence surrounding 7832 ha was completed in June 2014. The subsequent effort expended in eradicating feral Cat (Felis catus) and removing European Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) populations was logged daily during 11 months of active population removal and 3.5 months of monitoring. The total effort expended on cat eradication, rabbit removal and monitoring included over 4800 person‐hours of work and nearly 67,000 km of driving (of which 6700 km was for spotlighting), and the conduct of over 15,000 trap nights, 2300 km of sand tracking transects, and over 7800 camera‐trap nights. Total costs (in 2015 figures) were estimated at just over AUD $390,000, which equates to approximately $50 per hectare. Cage trapping was most efficacious for catching cats, although it took nine months to capture the last individual, which was detected independently by both sand tracking transects and camera traps. This research provides baseline data on the resources required for future eradication and removal projects, particularly those within fenced reserves.     

Roadside vegetation can provide valuable habitat for small, terrestrial fauna in South Australia

In some regions, extensive habitat clearance and fragmentation have largely restricted remnant vegetation to linear strips, often bordering roads and railway lines. Such areas may be important for the persistence of native wildlife but there is a paucity of research on their biodiversity value. This study in south-eastern South Australia compared the diversity and abundance of small, terrestrial animals in remnant vegetation, roadsides and farmland. Pitfall and Elliott trapping at 30 sites resulted in a total of 1,024 captures of 28 amphibian, reptile and mammal species, with 819 captures of six mammal species. Overall species diversity was highest in remnant sites and lowest in farm sites. Although low capture rates for reptiles and amphibians precluded statistical testing of individual species, many were caught in both remnant and roadside sites, but rarely at farm sites. Mammal captures consisted of four native (Cercartetus concinnus and C. lepidus, Pseudomys apodemoides and Rattus fuscipes) and two introduced (Mus musculus and Rattus rattus) species. Mus musculus was the most commonly caught species and was significantly more abundant in roadside than remnant vegetation. Abundance was negatively correlated with habitat quality and, at a finer scale, positively associated with percentage cover of exotic grasses. C. concinnus was also commonly captured; however, the absence of a difference in capture rates between remnant and roadside sites suggests that roadside vegetation provides important habitat. The abundance of C. concinnus was positively associated with percentage canopy cover. The current results highlight the conservation value of roadside vegetation and suggest that such areas should be both retained and appropriately managed.