Testes of DAZL null neonatal sheep lack prospermatogonia but maintain normal somatic cell morphology and marker expression

Multiplying the germline would increase the number of offspring that can be produced from selected animals, accelerating genetic improvement for livestock breeding. This could be achieved by producing multiple chimaeric animals, each carrying a mix of donor and host germ cells in their gonads. However, such chimaeric germlines would produce offspring from both donor and host genotypes, limiting the rate of genetic improvement. To resolve this problem, we disrupted the RNA‐binding protein DAZL and generated germ cell‐deficient host animals. Using Cas9‐mediated homology‐directed repair (HDR), we introduced a DAZL loss‐of‐function mutation in male ovine fetal fibroblasts. Following manual single cell isolation, 4/48 (8.3%) of donor cell strains were homozygously HDR‐edited. Sequence‐validated strains were used as nuclear donors for somatic cell cloning to generate three lambs, which died at birth. All DAZL null male neonatal sheep lacked germ cells on histological sections and showed greatly reduced germ cell markers. Somatic cells within their testes were morphologically intact and expressed normal levels of lineage‐specific markers, suggesting that the germ cell niche remained intact. This extends the DAZL mutant phenotype beyond mice into agriculturally relevant ruminants, providing a pathway for using absolute germline transmitters in rapid livestock improvement.     

Cloned cattle derived from a novel zona-free embryo reconstruction system

As the demand for cloned embryos and offspring increases, the need arises for the development of nuclear transfer procedures that are improved in both efficiency and ease of operation. Here, we describe a novel zona-free cloning method that doubles the throughput in cloned bovine embryo production over current procedures and generates viable offspring with the same efficiency. Elements of the procedure include zona-free enucleation without a holding pipette, automated fusion of 5-10 oocyte-donor cell pairs and microdrop in vitro culture. Using this system, zona-free embryos were reconstructed from five independent primary cell lines and cultured either singularly (single-IVC) or as aggregates of three (triple-IVC). Blastocysts of transferable quality were obtained at similar rates from zona-free single-IVC, triple-IVC, and control zona-intact embryos (33%, 25%, and 29%, respectively). In a direct comparison, there was no significant difference in development to live calves at term between single-IVC, triple-IVC, and zona-intact embryos derived from the same adult fibroblast line (10%, 13%, and 15%, respectively). This zona-free cloning method could be straightforward for users of conventional cloning procedures to adopt and may prove a simple, fast, and efficient alternative for nuclear cloning of other species as well.     

Donor cells for nuclear cloning: many are called,but few are chosen

The few viable clones obtained at the end of a typical cloning experiment are genetic copies of the donor cell genome of a non-reproductive (somatic) or embryonic cell used for nuclear transfer. Nuclear totipotency has to be reestablished by erasing epigenetic constraints imposed on the donor genome during differentiation in a process which involves active chromatin remodeling. Various donor cell types and cell cycle combinations have proven to be capable of generating cloned offspring. However, an ideal nuclear donor may have not yet been found. This review summarizes current theoretical aspects of donor cell selection. It focuses on the impact of genetic and epigenetic differences between donor cell types on successful mammalian cloning.     

Development of a zona-free method of nuclear transfer in the mouse

In the present study, a zona-free nuclear transfer (NT) technique, which had been originally developed in cattle, was modified for the mouse. Steps involved in this approach include removing the zona pellucida and enucleating without a holding pipette; sticking donor cells to the cytoplast before electric pulses are applied to fuse them and culturing reconstructed embryos individually in single droplets, to prevent aggregation. Control zona-free and zona-intact embryos from mated donors showed no significant difference in development to blastocyst, but did show reduced development to term. Removal of the zona pellucida affected the response to activation by strontium in the absence of calcium as a significant proportion of zona-free control oocytes and embryos reconstructed by NT lysed during this treatment. A comparison between cumulus and ES cells as donor cells revealed significant differences in fusion efficiency (58.1 +/- 4.0%, n = 573 vs. 42.9 +/- 2.2%, n = 2064, respectively, p < 0.001), cleavage (77.2 +/- 3.4%, n = 334 vs. 40.8 +/- 2.7%, n = 903, respectively, p < 0.001) but not for development to morula/blastocyst (8.7 +/- 2.1%, n = 334 vs. 13.9 +/- 1.8%, n = 903, respectively, p < 0.1). The stage at which embryo development arrested was also affected by donor cell type. A majority of embryos reconstructed from cumulus cells arrested at two-cell stage, usually with two nuclei, whereas those reconstructed from ES cells arrested at one-cell stage, usually with two pseudo-pronuclei. After transfer of ES cell-derived NT embryos, a viable cloned mouse was produced (3.0% of transferred embryos developed to term). These observations establish that a zona-free cloning approach is possible in the mouse, although further research is required to increase the efficiency.     

Donor cell differentiation,reprogramming, and cloning efficiency: Elusive or illusive correlation?

Compared to other assisted reproductive technologies, mammalian nuclear transfer (NT) cloning is inefficient in generating viable offspring. It has been postulated that nuclear reprogramming and cloning efficiency can be increased by choosing less differentiated cell types as nuclear donors. This hypothesis is mainly supported by comparative mouse cloning experiments using early blastomeres, embryonic stem (ES) cells, and terminally differentiated somatic donor cells. We have re-evaluated these comparisons, taking into account different NT procedures, the use of donor cells from different genetic backgrounds, sex, cell cycle stages, and the lack of robust statistical significance when post-blastocyst development is compared. We argue that while the reprogrammability of early blastomeres appears to be much higher than that of somatic cells, it has so far not been conclusively determined whether differentiation status affects cloning efficiency within somatic donor cell lineages.     

Practical aspects of donor cell selection for nuclear cloning

Choosing the right nuclear donor is the most critical decision in cloning by nuclear transfer (NT), or nuclear cloning, because the cloned animal will be a genetic copy of the donor cell genome used for NT. Both donor cell type and cell cycle stage are important methodological parameters and influence nuclear cloning efficiency. Cloning, however, is a multi-step procedure and the exact contribution of the nuclear donor to overall cloning success must be determined in comparative studies. This requires strict standardization of isolation, purification, and culture protocols, and application of stringent identification criteria in order to obtain a homogenous donor cell population. In all these respects, the standards in the cloning field are currently poor. The aim of this review is to provide a brief guideline for the major practical aspects of donor cell selection, cell cycle synchronization and preparation for NT.