Mechanistic aspects of promoter binding and chain initiation by RNA polymerase

Summary The physicochemical properties of the interactions of RNA polymerase (RPase) with promoter and nonspecific DNA sequences have been investigated. These show that nonspecific binding is principally an ionic interaction and that promoter binding is more complex, involving nonionic interactions. Nonspecific binding has been shown to be very important in the promoter search, and one-dimensional diffusion can account for the rate at which RPase finds the promoter. Significant differences have been reported in the binding process for various promoters and in the effects of regulatory proteins. Further investigation of these differences will lead to a better understanding of the selectivity and regulation of the initiation process.The pathways of the initiation process have been outlined, by recent studies and considerable progress has been made in determining the rates of interconversion of the intermediate states. A number of questions remain about the detail of initiation and the effects of various parameters on the reactions. Of particular importance is the identification of the point at which the enzyme becomes truly processive. In addition, the step which is rate limiting has not been identified in either the productive or nonproductive process. The mechanistic features of the steps after bond formation are just beginning to yield to investigation.Use of substrate analogs with RPase has led to a picture of the polymerization site according to the ability of the enzyme to incorporate analogs. Base specificity appears to be determined primarily by interaction with the template rather than the enzyme, but the ribose moiety must interact with the site quite specifically. The orientation of the phosphate residues has been determined by NMR, which has also proved to be a valuable probe of the initiation site. At this site base specificity is resident in the enzyme and expressed through the interaction of the base and intrinsic metal, as shown by studies with the Cobalt substituted enzyme. In both initiation and polymerization, the reaction has been shown to proceed by inversion of configuration. Techniques similar to those used for initiation will probably be applied to the polymerization reaction as well, which has not recently received as much attention with respect to mechanism. Functional phenomena such as pausing make the polymerization process particularly promising for producing insight into RPase reactions.     

Recognition of influenza virus hemagglutinin by subtype-specific and cross-reactive proliferative T cells: contribution of HA1 and HA2 polypeptide chains

The recognition of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) by T lymphocytes was examined by assaying the T cell proliferative response of influenza virus-primed T cells to purified HA of different influenza A subtypes or to isolated heavy (HA1) or light (HA2) polypeptide chains of the HA molecule. The proliferative response to HA was dependent on the activation of an Ly-1+2- subset of T cells and required the presence of nylon wool-adherent, radiation-resistant accessory cells. T cells from mice primed by infection with one strain of type A influenza virus cross-reacted with other purified HA not only of the same subtype as the priming virus but also of serologically distinct subtypes of influenza A (but not B) virus. The response of virus-primed T cells to the homologous HA or to HA of the same subtype was shown to involve recognition of determinants on both the HA1 and the HA2 chains. The recognition of HA of different subtype by cross-reactive T cells appeared to be directed predominantly to determinants on HA2. Because the antibody response to influenza virus HA is not cross-reactive between subtypes and is directed predominantly to determinants on HA1, the present results indicate that at least some of the determinants on HA recognized by T cells are different from those recognized by B cells and that the HA2 chain may be involved primarily in stimulation of T cell rather than B cell immunity.     

Provisioning of Game Meat to Rural Communities as a Benefit of Sport Hunting in Zambia

Sport hunting has reportedly multiple benefits to economies and local communities; however, few of these benefits have been quantified. As part of their lease agreements with the Zambia Wildlife Authority, sport hunting operators in Zambia are required to provide annually to local communities free of charge i.e., provision a percentage of the meat obtained through sport hunting. We characterized provisioning of game meat to rural communities by the sport hunting industry in Zambia for three game management areas (GMAs) during 2004–2011. Rural communities located within GMAs where sport hunting occurred received on average > 6,000 kgs per GMA of fresh game meat annually from hunting operators. To assess hunting industry compliance, we also compared the amount of meat expected as per the lease agreements versus observed amounts of meat provisioned from three GMAs during 2007–2009. In seven of eight annual comparisons of these GMAs, provisioning of meat exceeded what was required in the lease agreements. Provisioning occurred throughout the hunting season and peaked during the end of the dry season (September–October) coincident with when rural Zambians are most likely to encounter food shortages. We extrapolated our results across all GMAs and estimated 129,771 kgs of fresh game meat provisioned annually by the sport hunting industry to rural communities in Zambia at an approximate value for the meat alone of >US$600,000 exclusive of distribution costs. During the hunting moratorium (2013–2014), this supply of meat has halted, likely adversely affecting rural communities previously reliant on this food source. Proposed alternatives to sport hunting should consider protein provisioning in addition to other benefits (e.g., employment, community pledges, anti-poaching funds) that rural Zambian communities receive from the sport hunting industry.