Pleiotropic action of the murine quaking locus: Structure of the qk v allele

The spontaneous allele quaking^viable (qk ^v ) exerts effects on myelination and spermiogenesis. The defects generated by qk ^v were not separated in a multilocus mapping cross that provided a mapping resolution of 0.1 centiMorgans (cM). Furthermore, no distortions suggestive of a large chromosomal anomaly associated with qk ^v were apparent. One plausible interpretation is that the quaking locus contains more than one functional domain, either organized into overlapping genes or expressed by alternative splicing mechanisms. The cloning needed to analyze this locus will be enhanced by the very high resolution of the meiotic mapping cross reported here. The recombinational distances on this qk ^v map were compressed compared with those previously reported in a high-resolution map for qk ^1–1, an embryonic lethal allele of quaking induced by ethylnitrosourea. Additional crosses confirmed prior reports that the sex and the genetic background of the heterozygous parent can affect recombinational distances. These joint effects on recombination are strong enough to account for the discrepancy between the two maps. This variability of two-factor map values leads to the preferred multilocus map-building protocol discussed in the accompanying paper.     

Pulling or drilling, does size or species matter? An experimental study of prey handling in Octopus dierythraeus ()

The influence of both predator and prey size on the shift from a pulling to a drilling predatory response was examined in the intertidal octopus Octopus dierythraeus, using an experimental program. Additionally, selective drilling, where particular regions of the prey are targeted, was examined for a variety of bivalve and gastropod prey. O. dierythraeus always initially attempted to pull bivalves apart. Shells that were eventually drilled were always subjected to significantly more pulling attempts than those that could be pulled apart, indicating that octopus are willing to expend more energy to access the flesh quickly. There was no defined threshold where bivalve size caused an octopus to switch from a pulling to a drilling response. Instead, there was a broad size range where the octopus could adopt either handling method and it varied for each individual. Octopus may only able to pull open bivalves before the molecular ratchet or ‘catch’ mechanism that many bivalves possess is engaged. This might explain the lack of a relationship between either octopus or bivalve size and the success of pulling, as it is likely that when the bivalves were presented to individual octopus they were either setting the ‘catch’ mechanism, or had already engaged it. O. dierythraeus demonstrated selective drilling on a variety of molluscan prey, with penetration sites differing between prey species. O. dierythraeus targeted the valve periphery, which was the thinnest part of the shell, therefore minimizing handling time. O. dierythraeus always drilled gastropods, but did not target the thinnest regions of the shells, with drill site varying according to the morphology of the prey. Elongate species with pronounced aperture lips were drilled in the apical region, close to the columella on the side of the opercula whereas nonelongate species were drilled immediately above the aperture. The location of drilling sites may represent a trade-off between targeting the most effective places to inject paralyzing secretions and the mechanically simplest places to drill.