The structure and function of songs emitted by southern green stink bugs from Brazil, Florida, Italy and Slovenia

Nezara viridula (L.) (Pentatomidae: Heteroptera) from Brazil, Florida, Italy and Slovenia, communicate by vibratory songs associated with long‐range calling and close‐range courting, rivalry and repelling. Each song is composed of spectrally and temporally different units. Spectrally different pulses of duration less than 300 ms are present in the male calling song. The female calling song is characterized by pulse trains composed of pulses shorter than 150 ms and pulse trains composed of a longer (> 700 ms) and shorter (< 250 ms) pulse. Shorter and longer pulses have different spectral characteristics. The male and female courtship songs are characterized by fusion of shorter (< 150 ms) pulses into a pulse train usually followed by a shorter (< 200 ms) postpulse in the case of the male courtship song. The female repelling song is a several seconds long vibration of irregular temporal structure. The short (< 400 ms) male rival song pulses are frequency modulated. The dominant frequency peaks of the songs investigated lie between 70 and 130 Hz. The dominant frequency and the microstructure of song spectra show no population specificity. The average duration varies more in calling than in courtship songs. The repetition time varies extensively in songs of different populations. Normal communication followed by copulation was observed between mates from Slovenia and Brazil and between mates from Florida and Italy. The potential role of different temporal and spectral parameters for species recognition and mate location is discussed in view of the expected distortion of the characteristic signal structure during transmission through plants.     

Inter-plant vibrational communication in a leafhopper insect

Vibrational communication is one of the least understood channels of communication. Most studies have focused on the role of substrate-borne signals in insect mating behavior, where a male and a female establish a stereotyped duet that enables partner recognition and localization. While the effective communication range of substrate-borne signals may be up to several meters, it is generally accepted that insect vibrational communication is limited to a continuous substrate. Until now, interplant communication in absence of physical contact between plants has never been demonstrated in a vibrational communicating insect. With a laser vibrometer we investigated transmission of natural and played back vibrational signals of a grapevine leafhopper, Scaphoideus titanus, when being transmitted between leaves of different cuttings without physical contact. Partners established a vibrational duet up to 6 cm gap width between leaves. Ablation of the antennae showed that antennal mechanoreceptors are not essential in detection of mating signals. Our results demonstrate for the first time that substrate discontinuity does not impose a limitation on communication range of vibrational signals. We also suggest that the behavioral response may depend on the signal intensity.     

Residues of Heat-Labile Enterotoxin Involved in Bacterial Cell Surface Binding

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a leading cause of traveler''s diarrhea worldwide. One major virulence factor released by this pathogen is the heat-labile enterotoxin LT, which upsets the balance of electrolytes in the intestine. After export, LT binds to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the bacterial surface. Although the residues responsible for LT''s binding to its host receptor are known, the portion of the toxin which mediates LPS binding has not been defined previously. Here, we describe mutations in LT that impair the binding of the toxin to the external surface of E. coli without altering holotoxin assembly. One mutation in particular, T47A, nearly abrogates surface binding without adversely affecting expression or secretion in ETEC. Interestingly, T47A is able to bind mutant E. coli expressing highly truncated forms of LPS, indicating that LT binding to wild-type LPS may be due primarily to association with an outer core sugar. Consequently, we have identified a region of LT distinct from the pocket involved in eukaryotic receptor binding that is responsible for binding to the surface of E. coli.Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), a common etiologic agent behind traveler''s diarrhea, is also a significant cause of mortality worldwide (38). Many strains of ETEC elaborate a virulence factor called heat-labile enterotoxin or LT (34). LT is an AB₅ toxin, consisting of a single A subunit, LTA, and a ring of five B subunits, LTB (33). LTB mediates the toxin''s binding properties, and LTA ADP ribosylates host G proteins, increasing levels of cyclic AMP and causing the efflux of electrolytes and water into the intestinal lumen (27, 35). Each subunit of LT is translated separately from a bicistronic message and then transported to the periplasm, where holotoxin assembly spontaneously occurs (16). Subsequent export into the extracellular milieu is carried out by the main terminal branch of the general secretory pathway (31, 36).LT binds eukaryotic cells via an interaction between LTB and host gangliosides, primarily the monosialoganglioside GM₁ (35). The binding site for GM₁, situated at the interface of two B subunits, has been identified by crystallography (26). GM₁ binding can be strongly impaired by a point mutation in LTB that converts Gly-33 to an aspartic acid residue (37). LT is highly homologous to cholera toxin (CT), both in sequence and structure (7, 35), contributing to ETEC''s potentially cholera-like symptoms (39).Previous work in our lab has demonstrated that LT possesses an additional binding capacity beyond its affinity for host glycolipids: the ability to associate with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the surface of E. coli (20). LPS, the major component of the outer leaflet of the gram-negative outer membrane, consists of a characteristic lipid moiety, lipid A, covalently linked to a chain of sugar residues (30). In bacteria like E. coli, this sugar chain can be further divided into an inner core oligosaccharide of around five sugars, an outer core of four to six additional sugars, and in some cases a series of oligosaccharide repeats known as the O antigen. Lipid A itself cannot inhibit binding of soluble LT to cells containing full-length or truncated LPS, indicating that the LT-LPS interaction involves sugar residues on the surface of E. coli (19). The addition of the inner core sugar 3-deoxy-d-manno-octulosonic acid (Kdo) is the minimal lipid A modification required for LT binding, although longer oligosaccharide chains are preferred, and expression of a kinase that phosphorylates Kdo abrogates binding by LT (19). Competitive binding assays and microscopy with fluorescently labeled ETEC vesicles show that binding to GM₁ and LPS can occur at the same time, revealing that the binding sites are distinct (20, 23). In contrast to LT''s ability to bind to the surface of ETEC, CT (or LT, when expressed heterologously) cannot bind Vibrio cells, presumably because Kdo is phosphorylated in Vibrio spp. (5).As a result of the LT-LPS surface interaction, over 95% of secreted LT is found associated with E. coli outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), rather than being secreted solubly (20). OMVs are spherical structures, 50 to 200 nm in diameter, that are derived from the outer membrane but also enclose periplasmic components (24). As such, active LT is found both on the surface of an OMV and within its lumen (21). ETEC releases a large amount of OMVs (40), and these vesicles may serve as vehicles for delivery of LT to host cells.Recent work by Holmner et al. has uncovered a third binding substrate for LT: human blood group A antigen (17, 18). This interaction was noted previously as a novel binding characteristic of artificially constructed CT-LT hybrid molecules, but it has now been shown to occur with wild-type LT as well (17, 18). LTB binding to sugar residues in the receptor molecule occurs at a site that is separate from the GM₁-binding pocket, in the same region we proposed was involved in LPS binding (17, 19). While the severity of cholera disease symptoms has been linked to blood type (14), the effects of blood type on ETEC infection are less clear. However, it has been demonstrated that LT can use A antigen as a functional receptor in cultured human intestinal cells (11, 12), and one recent cohort study found an increased prevalence of ETEC-based diarrhea among children with A or AB blood type (29).We set out to generate a mutation in LT that reduces its LPS binding without adversely affecting its expression, secretion, or toxicity. In this work, we present the discovery of point mutations in LTB that impair its interactions with the bacterial surface. Examination of these mutations reveals an LPS binding pocket which shares residues with the blood sugar pocket. Binding studies of mutants to bacteria with truncated LPS provide a better understanding of the roles that inner and outer core sugars play in toxin binding, and expression, secretion, and toxicity studies demonstrate which mutant is a particularly good candidate for future research. These binding mutants may lead to further discovery of the role that surface binding plays in the pathogenesis associated with ETEC infection.     

Bacterial surface association of heat-labile enterotoxin through lipopolysaccharide after secretion via the general secretory pathway

Heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) is an important virulence factor expressed by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. The route of LT secretion through the outer membrane and the cellular and extracellular localization of secreted LT were examined. Using a fluorescently labeled receptor, LT was found to be specifically secreted onto the surface of wild type enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. The main terminal branch of the general secretory pathway (GSP) was necessary and sufficient to localize LT to the bacterial surface in a K-12 strain. LT is a heteromeric toxin, and we determined that its cell surface localization was mediated by the its B subunit independent of an intact G(M1) ganglioside binding site and that LT binds lipopolysaccharide and G(M1) concurrently. The majority of LT secreted into the culture supernatant by the GSP in E. coli associated with vesicles. Only a mutation in hns, not overexpression of the GSP or LT, caused an increase in vesicle yield, supporting a specific vesicle formation machinery regulated by the nucleoid-associated protein HNS. We propose a model in which LT is secreted by the GSP across the outer membrane, secreted LT binds lipopolysaccharide via a G(M1)-independent binding region on its B subunit, and LT on the surface of released outer membrane vesicles interacts with host cell receptors, leading to intoxication. These data explain a novel mechanism of vesicle-mediated receptor-dependent delivery of a bacterial toxin into a host cell.     

Outer membrane vesicle production by Escherichia coli is independent of membrane instability

It has been long noted that gram-negative bacteria produce outer membrane vesicles, and recent data demonstrate that vesicles released by pathogenic strains can transmit virulence factors to host cells. However, the mechanism of vesicle release has remained undetermined. This genetic study addresses whether these structures are merely a result of membrane instability or are formed by a more directed process. To elucidate the regulatory mechanisms and physiological basis of vesiculation, we conducted a screen in Escherichia coli to identify gene disruptions that caused vesicle over- or underproduction. Only a few low-vesiculation mutants and no null mutants were recovered, suggesting that vesiculation may be a fundamental characteristic of gram-negative bacterial growth. Gene disruptions were identified that caused differences in vesicle production ranging from a 5-fold decrease to a 200-fold increase relative to wild-type levels. These disruptions included loci governing outer membrane components and peptidoglycan synthesis as well as the sigma(E) cell envelope stress response. Mutations causing vesicle overproduction did not result in upregulation of the ompC gene encoding a major outer membrane protein. Detergent sensitivity, leakiness, and growth characteristics of the novel vesiculation mutant strains did not correlate with vesiculation levels, demonstrating that vesicle production is not predictive of envelope instability.     

Specificity of the Type II Secretion Systems of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae for Heat-Labile Enterotoxin and Cholera Toxin

The Gram-negative type II secretion (T2S) system is a multiprotein complex mediating the release of virulence factors from a number of pathogens. While an understanding of the function of T2S components is emerging, little is known about what identifies substrates for export. To investigate T2S substrate recognition, we compared mutations affecting the secretion of two highly homologous substrates: heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and cholera toxin (CT) from Vibrio cholerae. Each toxin consists of one enzymatic A subunit and a ring of five B subunits mediating the toxin''s secretion. Here, we report two mutations in LT''s B subunit (LTB) that reduce its secretion from ETEC without global effects on the toxin. The Q3K mutation reduced levels of secreted LT by half, and as with CT (T. D. Connell, D. J. Metzger, M. Wang, M. G. Jobling, and R. K. Holmes, Infect. Immun. 63:4091-4098, 1995), the E11K mutation impaired LT secretion. Results in vitro and in vivo show that these mutants are not degraded more readily than wild-type LT. The Q3K mutation did not significantly affect CT B subunit (CTB) secretion from V. cholerae, and the E11A mutation altered LT and CTB secretion to various extents, indicating that these toxins are identified as secretion substrates in different ways. The levels of mutant LTB expressed in V. cholerae were low or undetectable, but each CTB mutant expressed and secreted at wild-type levels in ETEC. Therefore, ETEC''s T2S system seems to accommodate mutations in CTB that impair the secretion of LTB. Our results highlight the exquisitely fine-tuned relationship between T2S substrates and their coordinate secretion machineries in different bacterial species.Gram-negative bacteria have evolved a number of methods to secrete proteins into the extracellular milieu, with at least six specific secretion systems currently described (14, 30). Type II secretion (T2S), or the main terminal branch of the general secretory pathway, is a feature of a number of proteobacteria and has been shown to be required for pathogenesis and maintenance of environmental niches in a large number of species (5). The T2S system is a multiprotein complex of 12 to 15 components that spans the inner and outer membranes, allowing for the controlled release of certain folded proteins that have been directed to the periplasm through the Sec or Tat machinery (21). Aside from providing a means of exporting freely released virulence factors from plant, animal, and human pathogens (5), the T2S system has been shown to export surface-associated virulence factors (18), fimbrial components (46), outer membrane cytochromes (36), and a surfactant required for sliding motility in Legionella pneumophila (39), among other substrates.While an increasing number of studies have focused on understanding the structure and function of the components of the T2S system itself, little is known about what identifies a periplasmic protein as a substrate for secretion (21, 32). Because proteins secreted from the same bacterial species need not share any obvious structural homology, it is not even clear how much of a T2S substrate interacts with the secretion machinery (32). Analysis of two similar substrates that can each be secreted by the T2S systems of two distinct species would provide information about species-specific identification of T2S substrates and, by extension, the nature of the “secretion motif” identifying those substrates. Heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and cholera toxin (CT) from Vibrio cholerae represent one such pair of substrates.ETEC and V. cholerae are enteric pathogens causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide (33). The causative agents of traveler''s diarrhea and cholera, respectively, these two pathogens share a number of similarities, including the nature of their disease symptoms (38). Each pathogen secretes an AB₅ toxin important for colonization and the induction of water and electrolyte efflux from intestinal epithelial cells (1, 29). These toxins, LT and CT, are both encoded by two-gene operons. After sec-dependent transport to the periplasm, holotoxin formation occurs spontaneously (13), with one catalytic A subunit (LTA or CTA) assembling with five B subunits (LTB or CTB), which are responsible for the binding properties of the toxins. Export of fully folded and assembled LT or CT is then accomplished by the T2S system (34, 40). In ETEC, this system is encoded by gspC to -M (40), while in V. cholerae, these genes are found in the eps operon (34).LT and CT are very similar in structure, sharing approximately 80% sequence homology and 83% identity in the mature B subunit (16, 24). ETEC is thought to have acquired the genes for CT through horizontal transfer, with the toxins evolving over time to possess slight differences (45). As such, these toxins share the same primary host receptor, the monosialoganglioside G_M1, and catalyze the same ADP-ribosylation reaction within host cells (38). However, LT is able to bind other host sphingolipids in addition to G_M1 and to interact with sugar residues from the A-type blood antigen, which CT cannot bind (16, 41). Both LT and CT are able to associate with sugar residues in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the surface of E. coli cells (17). Binding to each of these substrates can be impaired by point mutation (26, 43).In this study, we report point mutations impairing the release of LT from ETEC and CT from V. cholerae. We analyzed the specificity of the defects in substrate recognition by comparing the effects of substituting charged and neutral residues in key regions of LTB and CTB. To confirm that the identified mutations resulted specifically in a secretion defect, we tested the effect of the mutations on (i) ligand binding by each toxin, (ii) toxin stability, and (iii) formation of secretion-competent B-subunit pentamers. By introducing comparable mutations into both toxins, including one previously reported to impair the secretion of CT (6), and exchanging toxin substrates between the two species, we have revealed species-dependent differences in T2S substrate recognition. Although wild-type LT and CT can be heterologously expressed and secreted from V. cholerae and ETEC, respectively, the substrate residues identified by the secretion machinery in each species are distinct. Together, our results demonstrate that highly homologous T2S substrates are recognized in different ways when secreted by two distinct systems.