Presynaptic CK2 promotes synapse organization and stability by targeting Ankyrin2

The precise regulation of synapse maintenance is critical to the development and function of neuronal circuits. Using an in vivo RNAi screen targeting the Drosophila kinome and phosphatome, we identify 11 kinases and phosphatases controlling synapse stability by regulating cytoskeletal, phospholipid, or metabolic signaling. We focus on casein kinase 2 (CK2) and demonstrate that the regulatory (β) and catalytic (α) subunits of CK2 are essential for synapse maintenance. CK2α kinase activity is required in the presynaptic motoneuron, and its interaction with CK2β, mediated cooperatively by two N-terminal residues of CK2α, is essential for CK2 holoenzyme complex stability and function in vivo. Using genetic and biochemical approaches we identify Ankyrin2 as a key presynaptic target of CK2 to maintain synapse stability. In addition, CK2 activity controls the subcellular organization of individual synaptic release sites within the presynaptic nerve terminal. Our study identifies phosphorylation of structural synaptic components as a compelling mechanism to actively control the development and longevity of synaptic connections.     

Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the rap-1A protein from its homology to theras-gene-encoded p21 protein

rap-1A, an anti-oncogene-encoded protein, is aras-p21-like protein whose sequence is over 80% homologous to p21 and which interacts with the same intracellular target proteins and is activated by the same mechanisms as p21, e.g., by binding GTP in place of GDP. Both interact with effector proteins in the same region, involving residues 32–47. However, activated rap-1A blocks the mitogenic signal transducing effects of p21. Optimal sequence alignment of p21 and rap-1A shows two insertions of rap-1A atras positions 120 and 138. We have constructed the three-dimensional structure of rap-1A bound to GTP by using the energy-minimized three-dimensional structure ofras-p21 as the basis for the modeling using a stepwise procedure in which identical and homologous amino acid residues in rap-1A are assumed to adopt the same conformation as the corresponding residues in p21. Side-chain conformations for homologous and nonhomologous residues are generated in conformations that are as close as possible to those of the corresponding side chains in p21. The entire structure has been subjected to a nested series of energy minimizations. The final predicted structure has an overall backbone deviation of 0.7 å from that ofras-p21. The effector binding domains from residues 32–47 are identical in both proteins (except for different side chains of different residues at position 45). A major difference occurs in the insertion region at residue 120. This region is in the middle of another effector loop of the p21 protein involving residues 115–126. Differences in sequence and structure in this region may contribute to the differences in cellular functions of these two proteins.     

Preadapted for invasiveness: do species traits or their plastic response to shading differ between invasive and non‐invasive plant species in their native range?

Aim Species capable of vigorous growth under a wide range of environmental conditions should have a higher chance of becoming invasive after introduction into new regions. High performance across environments can be achieved either by constitutively expressed traits that allow for high resource uptake under different environmental conditions or by adaptive plasticity of traits. Here we test whether invasive and non‐invasive species differ in presumably adaptive plasticity. Location Europe (for native species); the rest of the world and North America in particular (for alien species). Methods We selected 14 congeneric pairs of European herbaceous species that have all been introduced elsewhere. One species of each pair is highly invasive elsewhere in the world, particularly so in North America, whereas the other species has not become invasive or has spread only to a limited degree. We grew native plant material of the 28 species under shaded and non‐shaded conditions in a common garden experiment, and measured biomass production and morphological traits that are frequently related to shade tolerance and avoidance. Results Invasive species had higher shoot–root ratios, tended to have longer leaf‐blades, and produced more biomass than congeneric non‐invasive species both under shaded and non‐shaded conditions. Plants responded to shading by increasing shoot–root ratios and specific leaf area. Surprisingly, these shade‐induced responses, which are widely considered to be adaptive, did not differ between invasive and non‐invasive species. Main conclusions We conclude that high biomass production across different light environments pre‐adapts species to become invasive, and that this is not mediated by plasticities of the morphological traits that we measured.     

Reaction of (bromoacetamido)nucleoside affinity labels with ribonuclease A: evidence for steric control of reaction specificity and alkylation rate

Four new bromoacetamido pyrimidine nucleosides have been synthesized and are affinity labels for the active site of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A (RNase A). All bind reversibly to the enzyme and react covalently with it, resulting in inactivation. The binding constants Kb and the first-order decomposition rate constants k3 have been determined for each derivative. They are the following: 3'-(bromoacetamido)-3'-deoxyuridine, Kb = 0.062 M, k3 = 3.3 X 10(-4) s-1; 2'-(bromoacetamido)-2'-deoxyxylofuranosyluracil, Kb = 0.18 M, k3 = 1700 X 10(-4) s-1; 3'-(bromoacetamido)-3'-deoxyarabinofuranosyluracil, Kb = 0.038 M, k3 = 6.6 X 10(-4) s-1; and 3'-(bromoacetamido)-3'-deoxythymidine, Kb = 0.094 M, k3 = 2.7 X 10(-4) s-1. 3'-(Bromoacetamido)-3'-deoxyuridine reacts exclusively with the histidine-119 residue, giving 70% of a monoalkylated product substituted at N-1, 14% of a monoalkylated derivative substituted at N-3, and 16% of a dialkylated species substituted at both N-1 and N-3. Both 2'-(bromoacetamido)-2'-deoxyxylofuranosyluracil and 3'-(bromoacetamido)-3'-deoxyarabinofuranosyluracil react with absolute specificity at N-3 of the histidine-12 residue. 3'-(Bromoacetamido)-3'-deoxythymidine alkylates histidines-12 and -119. The major product formed in 57% yield is substituted at N-3 of histidine-12. A monoalkylated derivative, 8% yield, is substituted at N-1 of histidine-119. A disubstituted species is formed in 14% yield and is alkylated at both N-3 of histidine-12 and N-1 of histidine-119. A specific interaction of the "down" 2'-OH group, unique to 3'-(bromoacetamido)-3'-deoxyuridine, serves to orient the 3'-bromoacetamido residue close to the imidazole ring of histidine-119. The 2'-OH group of 3',5'-dinucleoside phosphate substrates may serve a similar role in the catalytic mechanism, allowing histidine-119 to protonate the leaving group in the transphosphorylation step. (Bromoacetamido)nucleosides are bound in the active site of RNase A in a variety of distinct conformations which are responsible for the different specificities and alkylation rates.     

Comparison of the predicted structure for the activated form of the P21 protein with the X-ray crystal structure

The predicted conformation and position of the central transforming region (residues 55–67) of the p21 protein are compared with the conformation and position of this segment in a recently determined X-ray crystal structure of residues 1–166 of this protein in the activated state bound to a nonhydrolyzable GTP derivative. We previously predicted that this segment of the protein would adopt a roughly extended conformation from Ile 55-Thr 58, a reverse turn at Ala 59-Gln 61, followed by an -helix from Glu 62-Met 67. We further predicted that this region of the activated protein occupies a position that is virtually identical to corresponding regions in the homologous purine nucleotide-binding proteins, bacterial elongation factor (EF-tu), and adenylate kinase (ADK). We find that there is a close correspondence between the conformation and position of our predicted structure and those found in the X-ray crystal structure. A mechanism for activation of the protein is proposed and is corroborated by X-ray crystallographic data.