Studies on the destruction of indole-3-acetic acid by a species of Arthrobacter I. On the induction of the enzyme responsible for the destruction

1. The induction of an IAA-destroying enzyme in Arthrobacter sp.that can utilize IAA as its sole source of carbon and nitrogenwas investigated.
2. 1. The enzyme was most effectively inducedby 10–³ to2x10–³ M IAA, at pH 6.5.
3. 2. All testedIAA analogs were unable to induce the enzyme.Analogs otherthan indole-3-lactic acid were rather inhibitoryon the inductionwith IAA.
4. 3. The induction period was shortened with the ageof culturein both polypeptone and acetate media.
5. 4. Pretreatmentof the bacterium with IAA caused a shorteningof the inductionperiod.
6. 5. The induction was inhibited by various antibiotics,aminoacid analogs and nucleobase analogs.
7. 6. The inductionwas less remarkable in actively proliferatingcells than itwas in slowly proliferating ones.

(Received July 1, 1967; )     

Studies on the destruction of indole-3-acetic acid by a species of Arthrobacter IV. Decomposition products

Products of IAA decomposition by IAA destroying enzyme-inducedand non-induced cells of Arthrobacter sp. were examined. Catecholand pyrogallol, and 3-methyldioxindole were respectively identifiedfor non-induced and induced cells. Exogenous catechol was readilyoxidized by induced cells, but was not oxidized by non-inducedcells. Exogenous pyrogallol, 3-methyldioxindole, indole-3-aldehyde,skatole, 2,3-dihydroxindole, 3-methyleneoxindole, o-aminoacetophenone,3-hydroxyanthranilic acid, anthranilic acid and salicylic acidwere oxidized by neither induced nor non-induced cells. (Received June 16, 1969; )     

Studies on the destruction of indole-3-acetic acid by a species of Arthrobacter II. Properties of the oxidation system

1. Some properties of the IAA-oxidizing activity of lyophilizedcells of Artkrobacter sp. were examined.
2. 1. IAA oxidationseems not to be catalysed by peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase,laccase or dehydrogenase, but by an oxidase systemdifferentfrom the one reported earlier.
3. 2. The optimal pH for the oxidizingsystem is ca. 6.0, and thesystem is comparatively stable atpH 5 to 10.
4. 3. The optimal substrate (IAA) level is 10^–3M.
5. 4. Activity is inhibited by metal-chelating reagents, suchassodium azide, potassium cyanide, sodium diethyldithiocarbamate,potassium xanthogenate and 8-hydroxyquinoline, and sulfhydrylreagents, such as iodoacetamide, monofluoroacetic acid, p-chloromercuribenzoate,isatin, ß-naphthoquinone and ß-naphthoquinone-4-sulfonate.Hydroxybenzoic acid, sulfosalicylic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenolare also inhibitory.
6. 5. None of the IAA analogs tested (indole,skatole, 2,3-dihydroxyindole,indole-3-aldehyde, -3-carboxylicacid, -3-propionic acid, -3-lacticacid, -3-butyric acid, 5-hydroxyindole-3-aceticacid and D,L-tryptophan) are oxidized by the cells, and someanalogs (indole-3-carboxylicacid, -3-propionic acid, -3-butyricacid, 5-hydroxyindole-3-aceticacid, naphthalene-acetic acidand 2,4-D) are inhibitory at comparativelyhigh concentrations.
7. 6. The oxidizing activity is not stimulated by Mn⁺⁺ and isinhibitedby Co⁺⁺, Cu⁺⁺ and Hg⁺⁺.
8. 7. The oxidizing activitydisappears completely within 6 hrat 30, but is kept unchangedat least for two weeks at –20.

(Received August 7, 1967; )