Effects of essential divalent metals on carcinogenicity and metabolism of nickel and cadmium

Interactions between the physiologically essential metals calcium, magnesium, and zinc and the carcinogenic metals nickel and cadmium were investigated to help elucidate the mechanisms of action of the carcinogenic metals. Bioassay studies revealed several significant findings, including: (1) the ability of magnesium and calcium to inhibit nickel-induced elevation of pulmonary adenoma incidence in strain A mice; (2) the ability of magnesium, but not of calcium, to prevent cadmium-induced subcutaneous sarcoma formation; and (3) the ability of magnesium, but not of calcium, to inhibit nickel-induced muscle tumor formation. Biochemical studies indicated a direct relationship between the antitumorigenic potential of magnesium and the capacity of this metal to: (1) inhibit nickel and cadmium uptake by the target tissues in vivo; (2) inhibit nickel-induced disturbances in DNA synthesis in vivo; (3) inhibit nuclear and cytosolic uptake of nickel by the target tissue cells in vivo; and (4) inhibit nickel and cadmium binding to DNA in vitro. Calcium, which in most cases did not prevent carcinogenesis, had no consistent influence on the uptake of carcinogenic metals or their biochemical effects in the target tissues. Magnesium and zinc, but not calcium, were also found to attenuate the acute toxic effects of nickel, indicating a possible correlation between prevention of acute effects and reduction in tumorigenicity. Zinc, which antagonizes cadmium tumorigenicity in the rat testis, was found to reduce markedly cadmium uptake into isolated testicular interstitial cells. Also, zinc was found to inhibit strongly cadmium binding to DNA in vitro.     

Mammalian cell processing of a unique uracil residue in simian virus 40 DNA.

The processing of a unique uracil in DNA has been studied in mammalian cells. A synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotide carrying a potential Bgl II restriction site, where one base has been substituted with a uracil, was inserted in the early intron of SV40 genome. Various heteroduplexes were constructed in such a manner that the restitution of an active Bgl II restriction site corresponds in each case to the specific substitution of the uracil by one of the four bases normally present in the DNA. DNA cuts by this restriction enzyme in one or several constructed heteroduplexes immediately determine the type of base pair substitution produced at the site of the U residue. When the uracil is inserted opposite a purine it is fully repaired; when facing a guanine it is replaced by a cytosine and opposite an adenine it is replaced by a thymine. These results indicate the error-free repair of uracil when it appears in the cell with the usual mechanisms such as cytosine deamination or incorporation of dUTP in place of dTTP during replication. When the uracil is inserted opposite a pyrimidine no error free repair at all is detected for U:C or U:T mismatches. It appears, moreover, that in approximately 18% of the cases U:T mismatch leads to a C:G base pairing. In the majority of the U:pyrimidine mismatches, mutations occur in the vicinity of the uracil, including base substitutions and frameshifts by addition of one or several bases.     

Peripheral benzodiazepine binding sites: Effect of PK 11195, 1-(2-chlorophenyl)-n-methyl-n-(1-methylpropyl)-3-isoquinolinecarboxamide: I. In vitro studies

[³H] R05-4864 binding sites have been characterized in kidney, heart, brain, adrenals and platelets in the rat. In all these organs the following order of potency in the R05-4864 displacement was found : R05-4864 > diazepam > clonazepam indicating that they correspond to the “peripheral type” of benzodiazepine binding sites. PK 11195, an isoquinoline carboxamide derivative, displaces [³H] R05-4864 from its binding sites in all the organs. PK 11195 was as potent as R05-4864 in the platelets, heart, adrenals, kidney and several brain regions (midbrain, hypothalamus, medulla + pons and hippocampus. However it was 5 to 10 times more effective in cortex and striatum. In conclusion PK 11195 might represent a new tool to elucidate the physiological relevance of “peripheral type” benzodiazepine binding sites and might help to discriminate the hypothetical subclasses of these binding sites.     

Structural Aspects of Saltatory Particle Movement

A variety of cells possess particles which show movements statistically different from Brownian movements. They are characterized by discontinuous jumps of 2–30 µ at velocities of 0.5–5 µ/sec or more. A detailed analysis of these saltatory, jumplike movements makes it most likely that they are caused by transmission of force to the particles by a fiber system in the cell outside of the particle itself. Work with isolated droplets of cytoplasm from algae demonstrates a set of fibers involved in both cytoplasmic streaming and saltatory motion, suggesting that both phenomena are related to the same force-generating set of fibers. Analysis of a variety of systems in which streaming and/or saltatory movement occurs reveals two types of fiber systems spatially correlated with the movement, microtubules and 50 A microfilaments. The fibers in Nitella (alga) are of the microfilament type. In other systems (melanocyte processes, mitotic apparatus, nerve axons) microtubules occur. A suggestion is made, based on work on cilia, that a microtubule-microfilament complex may be present in those cases in which only microtubules appear to be present, with the microfilament closely associated with or buried in the microtubule wall. If so, then microfilaments, structurally similar to smooth muscle filaments, may be a force-generating element in a very wide variety of saltatory and streaming phenomena.     

Product of the Lactococcus lactis gene required for malolactic fermentation is homologous to a family of positive regulators.

Malolactic fermentation is a secondary fermentation that many lactic acid bacteria can carry out when L-malate is present in the medium. The activation of the malolactic system in Lactococcus lactis is mediated by a locus we call mleR. Induction of the genes necessary to perform malolactic fermentation occurs only in bacteria with a functional copy of mleR. The mleR gene consists of one open reading frame capable of coding for a protein with a calculated molecular mass of 33,813 daltons. The amino acid sequence of the predicted MleR gene product is homologous to that of positive activators in gram-negative bacteria: LysR, IlvY gene products of Escherichia coli, MetR, CysB of Salmonella typhimurium, AmpR of Enterobacter cloacae, NodD of Rhizobium sp., and TrpI of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.     

Imbalance of leucine flux in Lactococcus lactis and its use for the isolation of diacetyl-overproducing strains.

Diacetyl is a by-product of pyruvate metabolism in Lactococcus lactis, where pyruvate is first converted to alpha-acetolactate, which is slowly decarboxylated to diacetyl in the presence of oxygen. L. lactis usually converts alpha-acetolactate to acetoin enzymatically, by alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase encoded by the aldB gene. We took advantage of the fact that this enzyme also has a central role in the regulation of branched-chain amino acids, to select spontaneous aldB mutants in an unbalanced concentration of leucine versus those of valine and isoleucine in the medium. Industrial dairy strains of L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis containing point mutations and deletions of aldB were isolated and characterized. Their growth in milk was not affected, but they rapidly accumulated a large amount of alpha-acetolactate instead of acetoin from citrate in milk. Under aerated condition, strains devoid of AldB produced about 10 times more diacetyl than did the parental strains.     

Book Review

Book reviewed in this article:
Archeology: Archaeology as Human Ecology . Karl W. Butzer
Archeology: Environmental Archaeology . Myra Shackley     

Malolactic fermentation: electrogenic malate uptake and malate/lactate antiport generate metabolic energy.

The mechanism of metabolic energy production by malolactic fermentation in Lactococcus lactis has been investigated. In the presence of L-malate, a proton motive force composed of a membrane potential and pH gradient is generated which has about the same magnitude as the proton motive force generated by the metabolism of a glycolytic substrate. Malolactic fermentation results in the synthesis of ATP which is inhibited by the ionophore nigericin and the F0F1-ATPase inhibitor N,N-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide. Since substrate-level phosphorylation does not occur during malolactic fermentation, the generation of metabolic energy must originate from the uptake of L-malate and/or excretion of L-lactate. The initiation of malolactic fermentation is stimulated by the presence of L-lactate intracellularly, suggesting that L-malate is exchanged for L-lactate. Direct evidence for heterologous L-malate/L-lactate (and homologous L-malate/L-malate) antiport has been obtained with membrane vesicles of an L. lactis mutant deficient in malolactic enzyme. In membrane vesicles fused with liposomes, L-malate efflux and L-malate/L-lactate antiport are stimulated by a membrane potential (inside negative), indicating that net negative charge is moved to the outside in the efflux and antiport reaction. In membrane vesicles fused with liposomes in which cytochrome c oxidase was incorporated as a proton motive force-generating mechanism, transport of L-malate can be driven by a pH gradient alone, i.e., in the absence of L-lactate as countersubstrate. A membrane potential (inside negative) inhibits uptake of L-malate, indicating that L-malate is transported an an electronegative monoanionic species (or dianionic species together with a proton). The experiments described suggest that the generation of metabolic energy during malolactic fermentation arises from electrogenic malate/lactate antiport and electrogenic malate uptake (in combination with outward diffusion of lactic acid), together with proton consumption as result of decarboxylation of L-malate. The net energy gain would be equivalent to one proton translocated form the inside to the outside per L-malate metabolized.     

An ecological approach to biosystem thermodynamics

The general attributes of ecosystems are examined and a naturally occurring reference ecosystem is established, comparable with the isolated system of classical thermodynamics. Such an autonomous system with a stable, periodic input of energy is shown to assume certain structural characteristics that have an identifiable thermodynamic basis. Individual species tend to assume a state of least dissipation; this is most clearly evident in the dominant species (the species with the best integration of energy acquisition and conservation). It is concluded that ecosystem structure results from the antagonistic interaction of two nearly equal forces. These forces have their origin in the Principle of Most Action (least dissipation or least entropy production) and the universal Principle of Least Action. Most action is contingent on the equipartitioning of the energy available, through uniform interaction of similar individuals. The trend to Least action is contingent on increased dissipation attained through increasing diversity and increasing complexity. These principles exhibit a basic asymmetry. Given the operation of these opposing principles over evolutionary time, it is argued that ecosystems originated in the vicinity of thermodynamic equilibrium through the resonant amplification of reversible fluctuations. On account of the basic asymmetry the system was able to evolve away from thermodynamic equilibrium provided that it remained within the vicinity of ergodynamic equilibrium (equilibrium maintained by internal work, where the opposing forces are equal and opposite).At the highest level of generalization there appear to be three principles operating: i) maximum association of free-energy and materials; ii) energy conservation (deceleration of the energy flow) through symmetric interaction and increased homogeneity; and iii) the principle of least action which induces acceleration of the energy flow through asymmetrical interaction. The opposition and asymmetry of the two forces give rise to natural selection and evolution.