The chlorophyll a/b-binding protein inserts into the thylakoids independent of its cognate transit peptide

In order to determine if the cognate transit peptide of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein (LHCP) is essential for LHCP import into the chloroplast and proper localization to the thylakoids, it was replaced with the transit peptide of the small subunit (S) of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, a stromal protein. Wheat LHCP and S genes were fused to make a chimeric gene coding for the hybrid precursor, which was synthesized in vitro and incubated with purified pea chloroplasts. My results show that LHCP is translocated into chloroplasts by the S transit peptide. The hybrid precursor was processed; and most importantly, mature LHCP did not remain in the stroma, but was inserted into thylakoid membranes, where it normally functions. Density gradient centrifugation showed no LHCP in the envelope fraction. Hence, the transit peptide of LHCP is not required for intraorganellar routing, and LHCP itself contains an internal signal for localization to the correct membrane compartment.     

Identification of two structurally related proteins involved in proteolytic processing of precursors targeted to the chloroplast.

Two proteins of 145 and 143 kDa were identified in pea which co-purify with a chloroplast processing activity that cleaves the precursor for the major light-harvesting chlorophyll binding protein (preLHCP). Antiserum generated against the 145/143 kDa doublet recognizes only these two polypeptides in a chloroplast soluble extract. In immunodepletion experiments the antiserum removed the doublet, and there was a concomitant loss of cleavage of preLHCP as well as of precursors for the small subunit of Rubisco and the acyl carrier protein. The 145 and 143 kDa proteins co-eluted in parallel with the peak of processing activity during all fractionation procedures, but they were not detectable as a homo- or heterodimeric complex. The 145 and 143 kDa proteins were used separately to affinity purify immunoglobulins; each preparation recognized both polypeptides, indicating that they are antigenically related. Wheat chloroplasts contain a soluble species similar in size to the 145/143 kDa doublet.     

Soluble Chloroplast Enzyme Cleaves preLHCP Made in Escherichia coli to a Mature Form Lacking a Basic N-Terminal Domain

We have investigated the specificity of a chloroplast soluble processing enzyme that cleaves the precursor of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein (LHCP). The precursor of LHCP (preLHCP) was synthesized in Escherichia coli and recovered from inclusion-like bodies. It was found to be a substrate for proteolytic cleavage by the soluble enzyme in an organelle-free reaction, yielding a 25 kilodalton peptide. This peptide co-migrated during sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with the smaller of the forms (25 and 26 kilodalton) produced when either the E. coli-synthesized precursor, or preLHCP made in a reticulocyte lysate, was imported into chloroplasts. N-Terminal sequence analysis of the E. coli-generated precursor showed that it lacked an N-terminal methionine. N-Terminal sequencing of the 25 kilodalton peptide produced in the organelle-free reaction indicated that processing occurred between residues 40 and 41, removing a basic domain (RKTAAK) thought to be at the N-terminus of all LHCP molecules of type I associated with photosystem II. To determine if the soluble enzyme involved also cleaves other precursor polypeptides, or is specific to preLHCP, it was partially purified, and the precursors for Rubisco small subunit, plastocyanin, Rubisco activase, heat shock protein 21, and acyl carrier protein were tested as substrates. All of these precursors were cleaved by the same chromatographic peak of activity that processes preLHCP in the organelle-free reaction.     

Acyl carrier protein (ACP) import into chloroplasts does not require the phosphopantetheine: evidence for a chloroplast holo-ACP synthase.

Import of the acyl carrier protein (ACP) precursor into the chloroplast resulted in two products of about 14 kilodalton (kD) and 18 kD when analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Time course experiments indicate that the latter is a modification derivative of the 14-kD peptide after the removal of the transit peptide. Substitution of serine 38 by alanine, eliminating the phosphopantetheine prosthetic group attachment site of ACP, produced a precursor mutant that gave rise to only the 14-kD peptide during import, showing that the modified form depends on the presence of serine 38. Furthermore, these results demonstrate that the prosthetic group is not essential for ACP translocation across the envelope or proteolytic processing. Analysis of the products of import by nondenaturing, conformationally sensitive gels showed reversal of the relative mobility of the 14-kD peptide and the modified form, raising the possibility that the modification is the addition of the phosphopantetheine. Proteolytic processing and the modification reaction were reconstituted in an organelle-free assay. The addition of coenzyme A to the organelle-free assay completely converted the 14-kD peptide to the modified form at 10 micromolar, and this only occurred with the wild-type substrate. Reciprocally, treatment of the products of a modification reaction with Escherichia coli phosphodiesterase converted the modified ACP from back to the 14-kD peptide. These results strongly support the conclusion that there is a holo-ACP synthase in the soluble compartment of the chloroplast capable of transferring the phosphopantetheine of coenzyme A to ACP.     

Developmental regulation of an acyl carrier protein gene promoter in vegetative and reproductive tissues

The expression of an Arabidopsis acyl carrier protein (ACP) gene promoter has been examined in transgenic tobacco plants by linking it to the reporter gene -glucuronidase (GUS). Fluorometric analysis showed that the ACP gene promoter was most active in developing seeds. Expression was also high in roots, but significantly lower in young leaves and downregulated upon their maturation. Etiolated and light-grown seedlings showed the same level of GUS activity, indicating that this promoter is not tightly regulated by light. Histochemical studies revealed that expression was usually highest in apical/ meristematic zones of vegetative tissues. Young flowers (ca. 1 cm in length) showed GUS staining in nearly all cell types, however, cell-specific patterns emerged in more mature flowers. The ACP gene promoter was active in the stigma and transmitting tissue of the style, as well as in the tapetum of the anther, developing pollen, and ovules. The results provide evidence that this ACP gene is regulated in a complex manner and is responsive to the array of signals which accompany cell differentiation, and a demand for fatty acids and lipids, during organogenesis.     

Changes in Chloroplast DNA Levels during Development of Pea (Pisum sativum)

Determinations were made of the percentage of chloroplast DNA (ct DNA) in total cell DNA isolated from shoots of pea at different stages of development. Labeled pea ct DNA was reassociated with a high concentration of total DNA; the percentage of ct DNA was estimated by comparing the rate of reassociation of this reaction with that of a model reaction containing a known concentration of unlabeled ct DNA. The maximum change in ct DNA content was from 1.3% of total DNA in young shoots to 7.3% in fully greened shoots. Analyses were also performed on DNA from embryos, etiolated tissue, roots, and leaves. The first leaf set to develop in pea was excised over a growth period of 8 days during which leaf length increased from 4 to 12 millimeters. Young leaves contained about 8% ct DNA; in fully greened leaves the level of ct DNA approached 12%, equivalent to as many as 9,575 copies of ct DNA per cell. Root tissue contained only 0.4% ct DNA.     

Determinants for cleavage of the chlorophyll a/b binding protein precursor: a requirement for a basic residue that is not universal for chloroplast imported proteins

We demonstrate that the precursor of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein (LHCP of Photosystem II), encoded by a Type I gene, contains distinct determinants for processing at two sites during in vitro import into the chloroplast. Using precursors from both pea and wheat, it is shown that primary site processing, and release of a approximately 26-kD peptide, depends on an amino-proximal basic residue. Substitution of an arginine at position -4 resulted in an 80% reduction in processing, with the concomitant accumulation of a high molecular weight intermediate. Cleavage occurred normally when arginine was changed to lysine. The hypothesis that a basic residue is a general requirement for transit peptide removal was tested. We find that the precursors for the small subunit of Rubisco and Rubisco activase do not require a basic residue within seven amino acids of the cleavage site for maturation. In the wheat LHCP precursor, determinants for efficient cleavage at a secondary site were identified carboxy to the primary site, beyond what is traditionally called the transit peptide, within the sequence ala-lys-ala-lys (residues 38-41). Introduction of this sequence into the pea precursor, which has the residues thr-thr-lys-lys in the corresponding position, converted it to a substrate with an efficiently recognized secondary site. Our results indicate that two different forms of LHCP can be produced with distinct NH2-termini by selective cleavage of a single precursor polypeptide.     

Processing of the Precursors for the Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll-Binding Proteins of Photosystem II and Photosystem I during Import and in an Organelle-Free Assay

We have investigated whether the precursors for the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding proteins (LHCP) of photosystems II and I (PSII and PSI) are cleavable substrates in an organelle-free reaction, and have compared the products with those obtained during in vitro import into chloroplasts. Representatives from the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) LHCP family were analyzed. The precursor for LHCP type I of PSII (pLHCPII-1), encoded by the tomato gene Cab3C, was cleaved at only one site in the organelle-free assay, but two sites were recognized during import, analogous to our earlier results with a wheat precursor for LHCPII-1. The relative abundance of the two peptides produced was investigated during import of pLHCPII-1 into chloroplasts isolated from plants greened for 2 or 24 hours. In contrast to pLHCPII-1, the precursors for LHCP type II and III of PSI were cleaved in both assays, giving rise to a single peptide. The precursor for LHCP type I of PSI, encoded by gene Cab6A, yielded two peptides of 23.5 and 21.5 kilodaltons during import, whereas in the organelle-free assay only the 23.5 kilodalton peptide was found. N-terminal sequence analysis of this radiolabeled peptide has tentatively identified the site cleaved in the organelle-free assay between met40 and ser41 of the precursor.     

Structural properties of the chloroplast stromal processing peptidase required for its function in transit peptide removal

The stromal processing peptidase (SPP) catalyzes removal of transit peptides from a diversity of precursor proteins imported into chloroplasts. SPP contains an HXXEH zinc-binding motif characteristic of members of the metallopeptidase family M16. We previously found that the three steps of precursor processing by SPP (i.e. transit peptide binding, removal, and conversion to a degradable subfragment) are mediated by features that reside in the C-terminal 10-15 residues of the transit peptide. In this study, we performed a mutational analysis of SPP to identify structural elements that determine its function. SPP loses the ability to proteolytically remove the transit peptide when residues of the HXXEH motif, found in an N-terminal region, are mutated. Deletion of 240 amino acids from its C terminus also abolishes activity. Interestingly, however, SPP can still carry out the initial binding step, recognizing the C-terminal residues of the transit peptide. Hence, transit peptide binding and removal are two separable steps of the overall processing reaction. Transit peptide conversion to a subfragment also depends on the HXXEH motif. The precursor of SPP, containing an unusually long transit peptide itself, is not proteolytically active. Thus, the SPP precursor is synthesized as a latent form of the metallopeptidase.     

Determinants for removal and degradation of transit peptides of chloroplast precursor proteins

The stromal processing peptidase (SPP) cleaves a large diversity of chloroplast precursor proteins, removing an N-terminal transit peptide. We predicted previously that this key step of the import pathway is mediated by features of the transit peptide that determine precursor binding and cleavage followed by transit peptide conversion to a degradable substrate. Here we performed competition experiments using synthesized oligopeptides of the transit peptide of ferredoxin precursor to investigate the mechanism of these processes. We found that binding and processing of ferredoxin precursor depend on specific interactions of SPP with the region consisting of the C-terminal 12 residues of the transit peptide. Analysis of four other precursors suggests that processing depends on the same region, although their transit peptides are highly divergent in primary sequence and length. Upon processing, SPP terminates its interaction with the transit peptide by a second cleavage, converting it to a subfragment form. From the competition experiments we deduce that SPP releases a subfragment consisting of the transit peptide without its original C terminus. Interestingly, examination of the ATP-dependent metallopeptidase activity responsible for degradation of transit peptide subfragments suggests that it may recognize other unrelated peptides and, hence, act separately from SPP as a novel stromal oligopeptidase.