Comparison of Adoption Agency Breed Identification and DNA Breed Identification of Dogs

Governmental and other agencies may require dog caregivers (owners) to provide breed identification of their dogs. This study compares breed identification by adoption agencies with identification by DNA analysis in 20 dogs of unknown parentage. Of the 20 dogs who had been adopted from 17 different locations, the study identified 16 dogs as having (or probably having) 1 or 2 specific breed(s) in their ancestry. DNA analysis of these dogs indicated that 25% (4/16) did in fact contain genetic evidence of an adoption agency's identified breed as one of the predominant breeds in a dog's ancestry. DNA analysis did not detect all specified breeds in 14 of these dogs. That is, 87.5% of the dogs identified by an adoption agency as having specific breeds in their ancestry did not have all of those breeds detected by DNA analysis. The discrepancies between opinions of adoption agencies and identification by DNA analysis suggest that it would be worthwhile to reevaluate the reliability of breed identification as well as the justification of current public and private policies pertaining to specific dog breeds.     

Thrombospondin-5 and fluvastatin promote angiogenesis and are protective against endothelial cell apoptosis

The thrombospondins (TSPs), multifunctional matricellular proteins, are known mediators of endothelial cell (EC) angiogenesis and apoptosis. TSP-1, an antiangiogenic molecule, is important in the progression of vascular disease, in part by inducing EC apoptosis. TSP-2, although less studied, also induces EC apoptosis and inhibits angiogenesis. The effects of TSP-5 are largely unexplored in ECs, but TSP-5 is believed to be protective against arterial disease. Statin drugs have been shown to have beneficial pleiotropic effects, including decreasing EC apoptosis, increasing angiogenesis, and blocking TSP signaling. We hypothesized TSP-5 will be proangiogenic and antiapoptotic, and statin pretreatment would reverse the proapoptotic and antiangiogenic phenotype of TSP-1 and TSP-2. ECs were exposed to serum-free medium, TSP-1, TSP-2, or TSP-5 with or without fluvastatin pretreatment. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed on 96 apoptosis and 96 angiogenesis-related genes using microfluidic card assays. Angiogenesis was measured using Matrigel assays, while apoptosis was measured by fluorescent caspase assay. TSP-5 suppressed apoptotic genes and had a mixed effect on the angiogenic genes; however, TSP-5 did not alter apoptois but was proangiogenic. Pretreatment with fluvastatin downregulated proapoptotic genes and apoptosis and upregulated proangiogenic genes and angiogenesis. Findings indicate TSP-5 and fluvastatin have a protective effect on ECs, being proangiogenic and reversing the antiangiogenic effects of TSP-1 and TSP-2. In conclusion, TSP-5 and fluvastatin may be beneficial for inducing angiogenesis in the setting of ischemia.     

Effects of substrate patterning on cellular spheroid growth and dynamics measured by gradient light interference microscopy (GLIM)

The development of three‐dimensional (3D) cellular architectures during development and pathological processes involves intricate migratory patterns that are modulated by genetics and the surrounding microenvironment. The substrate composition of cell cultures has been demonstrated to influence growth, proliferation and migration in 2D. Here, we study the growth and dynamics of mouse embryonic fibroblast cultures patterned in a tissue sheet which then exhibits 3D growth. Using gradient light interference microscopy (GLIM), a label‐free quantitative phase imaging approach, we explored the influence of geometry on cell growth patterns and rotational dynamics. We apply, for the first time to our knowledge, dispersion‐relation phase spectroscopy (DPS) in polar coordinates to generate the radial and rotational cell mass‐transport. Our data show that cells cultured on engineered substrates undergo rotational transport in a radially independent manner and exhibit faster vertical growth than the control, unpatterned cells. The use of GLIM and polar DPS provides a novel quantitative approach to studying the effects of spatially patterned substrates on cell motility and growth.     

Simultaneous cell traction and growth measurements using light

Characterizing the effects of force fields generated by cells on proliferation, migration and differentiation processes is challenging due to limited availability of nondestructive imaging modalities. Here, we integrate a new real‐time traction stress imaging modality, Hilbert phase dynamometry (HPD), with spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) for simultaneous monitoring of cell growth during differentiation processes. HPD uses holographic principles to extract displacement fields from chemically patterned fluorescent grid on deformable substrates. This is converted into forces by solving an elasticity inverse problem. Since HPD uses the epi‐fluorescence channel of an inverted microscope, cellular behavior can be concurrently studied in transmission with SLIM. We studied the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and found that cells undergoing osteogenesis and adipogenesis exerted larger and more dynamic stresses than their precursors, with MSCs developing the smallest forces and growth rates. Thus, we develop a powerful means to study mechanotransduction during dynamic processes where the matrix provides context to guide cells toward a physiological or pathological outcome.      

Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control

Neuromechanics seeks to understand how muscles, sense organs,motor pattern generators, and brain interact to produce coordinatedmovement, not only in complex terrain but also when confrontedwith unexpected perturbations. Applications of neuromechanicsinclude ameliorating human health problems (including prosthesisdesign and restoration of movement following brain or spinalcord injury), as well as the design, actuation and control ofmobile robots. In animals, coordinated movement emerges fromthe interplay among descending output from the central nervoussystem, sensory input from body and environment, muscle dynamics,and the emergent dynamics of the whole animal. The inevitablecoupling between neural information processing and the emergentmechanical behavior of animals is a central theme of neuromechanics.Fundamentally, motor control involves a series of transformationsof information, from brain and spinal cord to muscles to body,and back to brain. The control problem revolves around the specifictransfer functions that describe each transformation. The transferfunctions depend on the rules of organization and operationthat determine the dynamic behavior of each subsystem (i.e.,central processing, force generation, emergent dynamics, andsensory processing). In this review, we (1) consider the contributionsof muscles, (2) sensory processing, and (3) central networksto motor control, (4) provide examples to illustrate the interplayamong brain, muscles, sense organs and the environment in thecontrol of movement, and (5) describe advances in both roboticsand neuromechanics that have emerged from application of biologicalprinciples in robotic design. Taken together, these studiesdemonstrate that (1) intrinsic properties of muscle contributeto dynamic stability and control of movement, particularly immediatelyafter perturbations; (2) proprioceptive feedback reinforcesthese intrinsic self-stabilizing properties of muscle; (3) controlsystems must contend with inevitable time delays that can simplifyor complicate control; and (4) like most animals under a varietyof circumstances, some robots use a trial and error processto tune central feedforward control to emergent body dynamics.