Brain electrical activity mapping: an exploratory study of infant response to odours

This mainly methodological paper describes the novel use ofan established EEG-based brain imaging technique (Brain ElectricalActivity Mapping or BEAM) to explore human infant responsesto odours. The aim of this study was to evaluate BEAM as aninvestigative tool in infant olfaction. A small sample of 3-month-oldinfants was tested in a low ambient odour environment. The infants'cortical responses to a number of proprietary baby-food odourswere recorded. Two experimental hypotheses were addressed. Thefirst concerned relative differences in cortical response beforeand during odour presentation. The second hypothesis statedthat differences would be seen between the various odorants.The overall results supported the first hypothesis. ¹Present address: School of Psychology, University of Birmingham,Birmingham B15 2TT, UK     

Human responses to propionic acid. II. Quantification of breathing responses and their relationship to perception

In 20 normal and four anosmic participants, instantaneous inhalation and exhalation flow rates were recorded in response to 15 s stimulations with clean air or propionic acid concentrations (0.16, 1.14, 8.22 and 59.15 p.p.m., v/v) that ranged from peri-threshold for normals to clearly supra-threshold for anosmics. Each odorant/irritant delivery to the face-mask began with an exhalation. This allowed concentration to reach full value before stimulus onset, defined as the point where the participant began to bring the stimulus into the nose by inhalation. Two seconds after this stimulus onset, normals exhibited cumulative inhaled volume (CIV) declines of 39 and 14%, and latencies of 500 and 710 ms, with presentations of 59.15 and 8.22 p.p.m., respectively. With anosmics, 59.15 p.p.m. caused a 19% decline in CIV that began at 730 ms. Examination of the first inhalation after stimulus onset shows that the CIV declines in normals were achieved by a progressive decline in volume (InVol), beginning with a slight drop at 1.14 p.p.m., and a marked decline in duration (InDur) with only the highest concentration. Anosmics exhibited declines in InDur and InVol with only the 59.15 p.p.m. stimulus, and these declines were much more modest than the changes seen in normals. Comparison of these breathing results with perceptual responses from this same experiment demonstrates that: (i) in normals, odor perception rises slightly, but breathing does not change, with the lowest concentration; (ii) the higher breathing sensitivity (declines in InVol) of normals is paralleled by both the higher nasal irritation of these individuals and the presence of odor sensation; (iii) InDur declines in normals only with a stimulus concentration sufficient to cause marked nasal irritation in anosmics; and iv) in anosmics, modest but reliable declines in both InDur and InVol mirror the marked elevation in nasal irritation magnitude seen with only the highest concentration. In view of the failure of prior work to provide evidence that olfactory activation alone can cause any of the breathing changes we observed, we conclude that some breathing parameters are quite useful as rapid and sensitive measures of nasal irritation that arises from activation of nasal trigeminal afferents alone or in combination with the olfactory nerve.     

Human odor detectability: new methodology used to determine threshold and variation

Current ambiguity concerning the related issues of optimal means for measurement of odor sensitivity and the functional properties of the olfactory system hinders progress in basic and applied research on the human sense of smell. To address these needs, we selected n-amyl acetate (nAA) as a test odorant and developed a methodology in which participants (Ps) receive multiple presentations each session of several concentrations. Yes-no responses as to whether odor was detected are analyzed using binomial statistics, with the probability that a given proportion of yes responses (or greater) would occur by chance alone being treated as the inverse of detectability. Over the course of multiple sessions, this information is also used to maximize the collection of data in the peri-threshold region. Surprisingly, data collected over as many as 14 sessions were fit well by a single logistic regression model relating probability and concentration. Threshold concentrations, defined as those corresponding to a probability of 0.05, varied from 7.11 to 167.53 p.p.b. (v/v) for 11 Ps. Our approach and findings, if shown to be representative of other combinations of Ps and odorants, could accelerate the pace of research in human olfaction by providing a comprehensive operational definition of the limit of the olfactory system to detect odorant molecules.     

Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics

The objective of this study was to fully characterize normosmic perception of stimuli expected to cause widely varying degrees of olfactory and nasal trigeminal stimulation and to directly evaluate the possible role of olfactory nerve stimulation in nasal irritation sensitivity. During each of four identical test sessions, four anosmic and 31 normosmic participants were presented with a range of concentrations extending from peri-threshold for normosmics to supra- threshold for anosmics. For each session, odor (O) and nasal irritation (NI) sensitivities were summarized in terms of the concentrations required to produce four sensation levels ('iso-response' concentrations). Within-participant variation in these iso-response concentrations was < 10-fold for 95% of normosmics, for both O and NI. For O but not NI, these apparent fluctuations in sensitivity were largely accounted for by the uncertainty surrounding the iso-response concentrations calculated for each session. Anosmics exhibited minimal within- and between-participant variation in NI and required, for all but the highest perceptual level, a higher concentration than almost all normosmics. Between-participant variation, expressed in terms of 90% confidence interval widths, was approximately 0.5 log units for both O and NI for the highest perceptual level, but increased to approximately 0.8 and 1.8 log units, respectively, for the lowest (peri- threshold) level. Our findings suggest that: (i) most apparent variation over time in O sensitivity is actually a reflection of the uncertainty surrounding estimates of sensitivity obtained for each session; (ii) within- and between-participant variation in O sensitivity is far less than is commonly reported; and (iii) low to moderate levels of NI in normosmics are the result of relatively weak trigeminal stimulation combined with much greater olfactory activation.      

An analysis of spontaneous human cortical EEG activity to odours

Using single trial presentation of odours, mapping of spontaneousEEG was made in naive subjects. Systematic increases in EEGamplitudes for alpha (8–13 Hz) frequency were shown forthe odours used and discrimination of odours was shown by specificelectrodes. These were mainly in the area bounded by International10/20 scalp locations CP1, PZ, CP2, TCP2 and C4. It was alsoshown that EEG recordings from more anterior electrodes couldbe related to psychometric responses. The findings showed thatstatistically reliable electrical amplitudes to odour presentationswere discernible in the noisy EEG environment on the surfaceof the brain.