Responses of Cyprinodon maya and C. labiosus females to visual and olfactory cues of conspecific and heterospecific males

Premating isolating mechanisms, based on visual and olfactory cues, were studied in two members of a young species flock which is endemic to Lake Chichancanab in Mexico. The two species, Cyprinodon maya and C. labiosus, differ in morphological traits that may be associated with trophic differentiation, but show little genetic change. Female C. maya strongly preferred conspecific males over C. labiosus males, based on visual as well as olfactory cues. C. labiosus females discriminated between conspecific and heterospecific males based on olfactory cues but not visual ones. Asymmetries in the strength of female preferences for conspecific males in this species pair suggest that mate recognition systems based on visual and olfactory cues evolve at different rates and track the degree of genetic differentiation.     

Mating preferences in a species flock of Mexican pupfishes (Cyprinodon, Teleostei)

Female mating preferences were examined in three members of an evolutionarily young Cyprinodon lineage from Laguna Chichancanab, Yucatan, Mexico. In separate experiments, females of C. beltrani and C. labiosus , and C. beltrani and C. maya were simultaneously presented with conspecific and heterospecific males and given the opportunity to spawn with either or both. These three species showed different degrees of conspecific mate recognition: complete for C. maya , intermediate for C. labiosus , and indiscriminate for C. beltrani. We conclude that only C. maya is reproductively isolated and that C. beltrani and C. labiosus still hybridize in nature. Whereas between C. beltrani and C. maya mate choice is symmetric, it is asymmetric between C. beltrani and C labiosus. The results of the mating trials are consistent with mitochondrial DNA data which indicate that C. maya is genetically the most distinct species in the flock. They are also supported by experiments on visually and chemically mediated mate preferences.     

Correlates and Consequences of Body Size in Nectar-Feeding Birds

Nectar-feeding birds are among the smallest birds and the largestpollinators. Energetic costs of maintenance, temperature regulation,foraging and reproduction increase in direct proportion to bodymass raised to fractional exponents, which may vary from 0.5to 1.0; overall costs probably vary with an exponent of 0.75.Avian nectarivores acquire most of their energy from flowernectar; in so doing they compete with other nectar feeders andpollinate plants. Larger pollinators are more reliable and movepollen greater distances, but to attract them plants must secretemore nectar and protect it from utilization by smaller animals.Minimum body size of avian nectarivores (2g) appears to reflectboth competition with insects and the limited capacity of thesmallest birds to acquire and store energy relative to the demandsof fasting, temperature regulation, and reproduction. Hummingbirdshave attained significantly smaller size than other nectar feedingbirds because lower metabolic rates and use of hypothermic torporreduce their energy expenditure relative to income. Maximumbody size of avian nectarivores (approximately 80g) apparentlyreflects the upper limit of plant energy expenditure for reliable,long distance pollination. Between these limits, size variationreflects divergence to reduce interspecific competition andcoevolution with plants to promote specificity     

Competition Between Distantly Related Taxa In the Coevolution of Plants and Pollinators

Competition among distantly related plants for pollinators andamong distantly related animals for pollen and nectar playsa potentially important role in the organization of ecologicalcommunities and the coevolution of plant-pollinator relationships.Plants which rely on animals to disperse their pollen potentiallycompete for pollinators by processes similar to interferenceand exploitative competition. Coexisting plant species may evolveto avoid or reduce such competition by character displacementin floral morphology and/or phenology. One important differencebetween competition for pollinators and most other kinds ofcompetition is that pollinator resources are not used up andmade absolutely unavailable to competitors. Consequently, plantspecies can potentially overlap completely in their utilizationof pollinators. The disadvantages of competing apparently aresometimes outweighed by the advantages of sharing pollinators,because distantly related plant species frequently show evolutionaryconvergence in floral morphology, blooming time and nectar rewardsto utilize the same pollinators. Distantly related animal taxa may compete for floral nectarand pollen by both interference and exploitation. The mechanismsof such competition depend primarily on the energetic costsand benefits of foraging and aggression. Exploitative competitionis very important because nectar feeders of small body sizeand low energy requirements can forage economically and reducenectar availability to levels that will not support larger animals.Thus small nectarivores often can exclude larger competitorsfrom flowers to which both taxa have equal access. Plants mayevolve to influence the outcotre of competition among animalvisitors and favor species that provide the best pollinationservices. Thus flowers specialized for pollination by largeanimals often show morphological or phenological specializationswhich make rewards unava'lable to smaller animals. Interferenceis adaptive only when the benefits of exclusive use of a resourceoutweig.i the costs of defending it. Because distantly relatedkinds of flower visitors often differ in body size and energeticrequirements, interference competition among them is probablyrare although it is often important among closely related nectarivores. The community level consequences of competition in the ecologyand evolution of plant-pollinator associations are still poorlyunderstoood. Competition among distantly related pollinatorsfor plant floral rewards appears to play a major role, but competitionamong plants for pollinator services may be only a weak force.Although the basic interaction between plant and pollinatorusually is a mutualistic one, certain species of both plantsand animals parasitize this interaction and compete with themutualists for limited resources. Thus some animals rob nectarand pollen and compete with legitimate pollinators without providingpollination services. Similarly, some plants offer no floralrewards but obtain pollinator services by mimicing rewardingflowers of other species. The effects of these kinds of interactionson the organization of communities of plants and pollinatorsprovide a fertile area for future research.     

Sexual selection is stabilizing selection in pupfish [Cyprinodon pecosensis)

One of the predictions of the 'good genes' model of sexual selection is that reproductively successful males with well-developed indicator traits should show smaller variances for non-indicator traits, that are not directly associated with mating success, when compared to non-breeding males and females. Thus sexual selection should reinforce stabilizing natural selection in reducing the variance in quantitative traits. This prediction is tested by analysing variation in eight morphological traits of breeding males, non-breeding males, and females of pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Breeding males tended to be less variable than non-breeding males for all principal component factors, and for all morphological traits except for depth, although these differences were statistically significant only for PC2, and PC5 and for pelvic fin length, number of pelvic fin rays and number of preopercular and preorbital pores. Similarly, breeding males tended to be less variable than females for all principal component factors and for all morphological traits except for number of preopercular pores. These differences were statistically significant for PC2, and for depth, pelvic fin length, number of preorbital pores and pectoral fin rays. The overall pattern of reduced variability in independent traits of breeding males revealed by principal component analysis is very consistent and highly significant (P<10⁵). These results support the prediction of the 'good genes' model and show that reproductively active males are subject to more severe stabilizing selection for several quantitative traits than non-breeding males and females. Thus sexual selection, through male-male competition, female choice, or an interaction of both selective processes, results in stabilizing selection on quantitative morphological traits.     

Sexual Dichromatism and Temporary Color Changes in the Reproduction of Fishes

SYNOPSIS. Studies on color patterns of fishes have focused onrelationships between bright, relatively permanent colors, suchas those of fishes inhabiting coral reef and tropical freshwaterhabitats, and ecological factors, such as competitors, predators,and the visual background. By comparison, the functions of,and hence the selective pressures acting on, temporary changesin nuptial coloration have received much less attention. Temporarycolor changes associated with reproduction occur in many freshwaterand marine groups. Nuptial coloration in fishes functions bothin agonistic interactions among males and courtship of females,so that it is subject to both intrasexual and intersexual selectionas well as natural selection. Temporal variation in nuptialcolor patterns is sensitive to temporal changes in the male'sphysical condition, motivation, and social status. Physiologicalprocesses, such as neuronal and endocrine changes, play importantroles in the expression of breeding colors, including rapidresponses to changes in social conditions. The importance ofproximal mechanisms and ultimate selective processes in mediatingrapid changes in the blue, melanin—based breeding colorsof pupfish, and the red, carotenoid—based color patternsin guppies are discussed in the context of signal function andevolution.