LOCALIZATION OF DYNEIN IN SEA URCHIN EGGS DURING CLEAVAGE*

Detection and localization of dynein in cleaving sea urchin eggs were attempted using antidynein serum (prepared against a tryptic fragment of dynein, Fragment A, of sea urchin sperm flagella) and fluorescein conjugated goat antiserum to rabbit γ-globulin. In both unfertilized and newly fertilized eggs, fluorescence was distributed rather uniformly within the cells but was absent from the nuclei. At prophase, intense fluorescence was observed on both sides of nucleus, suggesting accumulation of dynein in developing asters. From metaphase to anaphase, the whole mitotic apparatus (MA) was stained with the exceptions of the chromosomes and pole areas. Fluorescence then again became dispersed within the eggs. Throughout the mitotic process and cytokinesis, the egg cortex including the cleavage furrow was stained intensely, presumably reflecting the presence of dynein in this region. Similar distributions of fluorescence were obtained with the isolated MAs. Neither non-immune serum nor the antiserum to which Fragment A was absorbed stained the eggs. Little staining was obtained with the antiserum against starfish egg myosin. The results, together with the finding that the chromosome motion in the isolated MAs was completely inhibited by anti-dynein serum, but not with the anti-myosin serum, suggest an active role played by a tubulin-dynein system in mitosis.     

Evidence for a Viral Macronuclear Endosymbiont in Paramecium caudatum

ABSTRACT. Some strains of P. caudatum contain macronuclear inclusion bodies that are morphologically distinct from bacteria. They vary in number as well as in size in each macronucleus. The inclusion bodies are basically divided into peripheral and inner areas. The peripheral area consists of fibrillar proteins of 22–24 nm in thickness, which are specifically stained with fast green in 45% acetic acid. On the other hand, chromatin-like granules are within the inner area of large inclusion bodies. The granules within the inner area changed their distribution depending upon the physiological state of their host cells. Transplantation experiments and crossbreeding analyses revealed that genetic factors responsible for the multiplication of the inclusion bodies can 'infect' other macronuclei (or cells) via the cytoplasm. These results suggest that the inclusion bodies are a non-bacterial macronuclear endosymbiont, possibly produced by a virus or a virus-like element.