Protease inhibitors interfere with the transforming growth factor-beta-dependent but not the transforming growth factor-beta-independent pathway of tumor cell-mediated immunosuppression.

Tumor cells have been reported to exert inhibitory effects on the activation of T lymphocytes in vitro. We show that the IL-2-stimulated proliferation of a Th cell line is suppressed when the T cells are cocultured with human glioblastoma and melanoma cell lines. The use of two Th cell clones that differ in their responsiveness to growth-inhibition by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and the analysis of tumor cell-derived supernatants as well as of TGF-beta 1/TGF-beta 2 gene expression allowed to distinguish two pathways of tumor-induced immunosuppression. Glioblastoma cells exert their immunosuppressive effects by producing biologically active TGF-beta 2, whereas the immunosuppressive state induced by melanoma cells is TGF-beta-independent and requires direct contact between tumor cell and T cell. The TGF-beta-dependent immunosuppression is down-regulated by various protease inhibitors and up-regulated by estradiol via modulation of the production of biologically active TGF-beta 2 by glioblastoma cells leaving total activatable TGF-beta 2 unaffected. No such modulation is functional for the TGF-beta-independent pathway of immunosuppression. We conclude that the production of active TGF-beta by tumor cells is regulated at a posttranslational level by the coordinated action of several proteolytic enzymes.     

Prostaglandin levels in endometrial jet wash specimens in patients with dysmenorrhea before and after indomethacin therapy.

A patient with functional primary dysmenorrhea of over two years duration was subjected to the endometrial jet wash technique during the period of active menstrual flow. Prostaglandin F analysis of the jet washings revealed significantly elevated levels during menstruation over normal control levels. Following indomethacin therapy, jet wash prostaglandin F levels were dramatically reduced and the patient became asymptomatic. A cause and effect relationsship between prostaglandin F and dysmenorrhea is suggested by these studied.     

Fasting and differential chemotherapy protection in patients

Chronic calorie restriction has been known for decades to prevent or retard cancer growth, but its weight-loss effect and the potential problems associated with combining it with chemotherapy have prevented its clinical application. Based on the discovery in model organisms that short term starvation (STS or fasting) causes a rapid switch of cells to a protected mode, we described a fasting-based intervention that causes remarkable changes in the levels of glucose, IGF-I and many other proteins and molecules and is capable of protecting mammalian cells and mice from various toxins, including chemotherapy. Because oncogenes prevent the cellular switch to this stress resistance mode, starvation for 48 hours or longer protects normal yeast and mammalian cells and mice but not cancer cells from chemotherapy, an effect we termed Differential Stress Resistance (DSR). In a recent article, ten patients who fasted in combination with chemotherapy, reported that fasting was not only feasible and safe but caused a reduction in a wide range of side effects accompanied by an apparently normal and possibly augmented chemotherapy efficacy. Together with the remarkable results observed in animals, these data provide preliminary evidence in support of the human application of this fundamental biogerontology finding, particularly for terminal patients receiving chemotherapy. Here we briefly discuss the basic, pre-clinical and clinical studies on fasting and cancer therapy.Key words: fasting, cancer, chemotherapy, calorie restriction, stress resistanceAfter decades of slow progress in the identification of treatments effective on a wide range of malignancies, cancer treatment is now turning to personalized therapies based in part on pharmacogenomics. By contrast, aging research is moving in the opposite direction by searching for common ways to prevent, postpone and treat a wide range of age-related diseases, based on the modulation of genetic pathways that are conserved from yeast to mammals.¹ In fact, it may be a solid evolutionary and comparative biology-foundation, which makes this ambitious goal of biogerontologists a realistic or at least a promising one. On the other hand, the progress of biogerontology is viewed by many clinicians as too fundamental and far from translational applications. In most cases, it is not clear how aging research will be translated into FDA approved drugs or treatments that have effects that are superior to those already available or being developed. For example, it is not clear how the long-term 20–30% reduction in calorie intake (dietary restriction, DR) that we and many others before us have shown to be effective in extending the life span of model organisms will make humans live longer or healthier.^1–3 Furthermore, despite the fact that long-term DR was confirmed to reduce cancer and cardiovascular disease in monkeys⁴ and to be effective in preventing obesity, type 2 diabetes, inflammation, hypertension and atherosclerosis, as indicated by the early results in humans studies,⁵ it is highly unlikely to be adopted in its more extreme and effective version by even a small portion of the population. For example, the 20 to 40% chronic reduction in daily calorie intake shown to be effective in retarding cancer growth in mice would not be feasible for cancer therapy for multiple reasons: (1) the effects of chronic DR in patients with a clinically evident tumor is expected to delay but not stop the progression of the disease^6–8 and this delay may only occur for a portion of the malignancies,⁹ (2) although weight loss and cachexia in the early stages of treatment are less prevalent than commonly thought,^10–12 the ∼15% loss of BMI and ∼30% long-term loss of body fat caused by a moderate (20%) calorie restriction¹³ may be tolerated by only a very small portion of cancer patients receiving treatment, (3) Because this long-term restriction is accompanied by delayed wound healing and immunologic impairment in rodents,^1,14,15 it is not clear what risks it may impose on cancer patients receiving treatment.¹⁶ Our studies of DSR, which were triggered by our fundamental findings that switching yeast cells to water protected them against a wide range of toxins, started as a way to address these concerns but also as an attempt to achieve a much more potent therapeutic effect than that achieved by DR.^17,18 Because starvation-induced protection can increase many fold when combined with modulation of pro-aging pathways and since it is in principle blocked by the expression of any oncogene, it has the potential to provide a method to allow common chemotherapy to selectively kill cancer cells, independently of the type of cancer.^19–21 The DSR experiments in mammals were also based on our hypothesis that stress resistance and aging regulatory pathways were conserved from yeast to mammals.We found that fasting for 48 or more hours or in vitro starvation conditions that mimic fasting protected mice and/or normal cells but not cancer cells from various chemotherapy drugs and other deleterious agents.²¹ This effect was shown to depend in part on the reduction of circulating IGF-I and glucose levels.^21,22 Although a differential regulation of cell division in normal and cancer cells^23,24 is likely to contribute to DSR, much of it appears to be dependent on protective systems which are normally maintained in an inactive or low activity state even in non-dividing cells.^1,25 In fact, in non-dividing yeast and mice, deficiencies in glucose or IGF-I signaling that match those observed after starvation promote resistance to doxorubicin, a chemotherapy drug that specifically targets muscle cells in the heart.^21,22As expected, many clinicians were skeptical of our hypothesis that cancer treatment could be improved not by a “magic bullet” but by a “not so magic DSR shield” as underlined by Leonard Saltz, an oncologist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: “Would I be enthusiastic about enrolling my patients in a trial where they''re asked not to eat for 2.5 days? No.”²⁶ However, ten oncologists did allow their patients, suffering from malignancies ranging from stage II breast cancer to stage IV esophageal, prostate and lung malignancies to undergo a 48–140 hours pre-chemotherapy and a 5–56 hours post chemotherapy water-only fast. The six patients who received chemotherapy with or without fasting reported a reduction in fatigue, weakness and gastrointestinal side effects while fasting²⁷ (Fig. 1). A trend for a reduction of many additional side effects was also reported by the group of patients who always fasted before chemotherapy.²⁷ In those patients whose cancer progression was assessed, chemotherapy was effective and in some cases it was highly effective.²⁷ A clinical trial sponsored by the V-Foundation for Cancer Research, aimed at testing the safety and efficacy of a 24 hour fast in combination with chemotherapy, is in its safety stage. Because it was originally limited to patients diagnosed with bladder cancer the clinical trial progressed slowly. However, its recent expansion to include patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (breast, ovarian, lung cancer), is expected to expedite it. Conclusive results for the effect of a 3–4 day fast on chemotherapy-dependent side effects and possibly therapeutic index are not expected to become available for several years. Even if a more modest effect than the 1,000-fold differential protection against oxidative stress and chemotherapy observed in normal and cancer-like yeast cells was achieved in humans, this method could result in long-term survival for many patients with metastatic cancers, particularly those in which malignant cells have not acquired multidrug resistance.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Average self-reported severity of symptoms in patients that have received chemotherapy with or without fasting.     

Abacavir Induced T Cell Reactivity from Drug Na?ve Individuals Shares Features of Allo-Immune Responses

Abacavir hypersensitivity is a severe hypersensitivity reaction which occurs exclusively in carriers of the HLA-B*57∶01 allele. In vitro culture of PBMC with abacavir results in the outgrowth of abacavir-reacting CD8⁺ T cells, which release IFNγ and are cytotoxic. How this immune response is induced and what is recognized by these T cells is still a matter of debate. We analyzed the conditions required to develop an abacavir-dependent T cell response in vitro. The abacavir reactivity was independent of co-stimulatory signals, as neither DC maturation nor release of inflammatory cytokines were observed upon abacavir exposure. Abacavir induced T cells arose in the absence of professional APC and stemmed from naïve and memory compartments. These features are reminiscent of allo-reactivity. Screening for allo-reactivity revealed that about 5% of generated T cell clones (n = 136) from three donors were allo-reactive exclusively to the related HLA-B*58∶01. The addition of peptides which can bind to the HLA-B*57∶01-abacavir complex and to HLA-B*58∶01 during the induction phase increased the proportion of HLA-B*58∶01 allo-reactive T cell clones from 5% to 42%. In conclusion, abacavir can alter the HLA-B*57∶01-peptide complex in a way that mimics an allo-allele (‘altered self-allele’) and create the potential for robust T cell responses.     

Modulation of the cell-mediated immune function by interferon α, β or γ can partially reverse the immunosuppression induced by human T-cell leukemia virus I in human cord blood cultures

Summary Infection with human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) is associated in vitro and in vivo with a remarkable depression of cell-mediated immune functions. In the present report it is shown that early events following virus-induced suppression of the cell-mediated immune response of freshly isolated cord blood mononuclear cells (CBL) infected with HTLV-I can be partially counteracted by treatment with interferons , or (IFN). All three types of IFN exerted a protective effect on CBL cultures exposed to the virus. This resulted in: (a) a reduced number of virus-positive cells until 4 weeks of culture; (b) delay in the clonal expansion of infected cells (IFN and ); (c) increased natural killer cell activity of CBL, 1 week post-infection (p.i.), mediated by IFN; (d) increase of allospecific recognition of infecting and priming HTLV-I donor MT-2 cells by CBL in a cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-like response, mediated by IFN and particularly by IFN; (e) phenotype distribution of CBL subpopulations, tested 4 days p.i., more similar to that of non-infected CBL cultures.In contrast, the overall CBL proliferation, that is profoundly depressed during the first week p.i., was not restored by IFN treatments, suggesting that boosting of the cell-mediated killing induced by IFN might involve the maturation of undifferentiated precursor cells rather than stimulation of their proliferation. The improvement of the efficiency of the antiviral immune response induced by treatment with IFN is likely to contribute to the clearance of virus-positive cells during the early phase of infection. This would provide experimental evidence to support an immunopharmacological approach contributing to the conversion of HTLV-I carriers from positive to negative.     

Actinomycin D effects on termite chromosomes: induction of high resolution banding patterns with silver staining in mitotic stages

The treatment of termite male spermatogonia with actinomycin D induces highly elongated and finely banded late prophase and prometaphase chromosomes as evidenced by the silver staining method. Actinomycin D suppresses the silver staining of nucleolar organizing regions in prometaphase and reduces it in metaphase chromosomes.