Evaluation of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria for their efficiency to promote growth and induce systemic resistance in pearl millet against downy mildew disease

Six strains of Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) were tested for their ability to promote growth and induce resistance in pearl millet against downy mildew disease. All the PGRP strains showed a significant (P < 0.01) increase in growth promotion in laboratory as well as greenhouse conditions. Only two strains of Pseudomonas spp., UOM ISR 17 and UOM ISR 23, were capable of protecting pearl millet against downy mildew significantly. Pseudomonas UOM ISR 17 and UOM ISR 23 were able to offer 56.3 and 47.5%, respectively against downy mildew disease. When tested for the time gap needed to offer maximum protection, it was found that both the strains needed four days to offer maximum protection of 73.3% and 59.7%, respectively. While both the Acetobacter strains UOM Ab9 and Ab11 and Azospirillum strain UOM Az3 were able to promote growth and offered disease protection of 39.2, 22.3 and 17.40% respectively, they were not as efficient as the two Pseudomonas strains in protecting pearl millet against downy mildew. Maximum growth promotion was recorded by Pseudomonas spp. UOM ISR 17 with 33.9 cm height which was 44, 45, 42 and 46.8% more in height, fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area over the control which recorded 27 cm height, 8.1 g fresh weight, 2.1 g dry weight and 29 cm² leaf area, respectively.     

Different mechanisms of Trichoderma virens‐mediated resistance in tomato against Fusarium wilt involve the jasmonic and salicylic acid pathways

In the present study, we investigated the role of Trichoderma virens (TriV_JSB100) spores or cell‐free culture filtrate in the regulation of growth and activation of the defence responses of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici by the development of a biocontrol–plant–pathogen interaction system. Two‐week‐old tomato seedlings primed with TriV_JSB100 spores cultured on barley grains (BGS) or with cell‐free culture filtrate (CF) were inoculated with Fusarium pathogen under glasshouse conditions; this resulted in significantly lower disease incidence in tomato Oogata‐Fukuju plants treated with BGS than in those treated with CF. To dissect the pathways associated with this response, jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) signalling in BGS‐ and CF‐induced resistance was evaluated using JA‐ and SA‐impaired tomato lines. We observed that JA‐deficient mutant def1 plants were susceptible to Fusarium pathogen when they were treated with BGS. However, wild‐type (WT) BGS‐treated tomato plants showed a higher JA level and significantly lower disease incidence. SA‐deficient mutant NahG plants treated with CF were also found to be susceptible to Fusarium pathogen and displayed low SA levels, whereas WT CF‐treated tomato plants exhibited moderately lower disease levels and substantially higher SA levels. Expression of the JA‐responsive defensin gene PDF1 was induced in WT tomato plants treated with BGS, whereas the SA‐inducible pathogenesis‐related protein 1 acidic (PR1a) gene was up‐regulated in WT tomato plants treated with CF. These results suggest that TriV_JSB100 BGS and CF differentially induce JA and SA signalling cascades for the elicitation of Fusarium oxysporum resistance in tomato.     

Aginoside saponin,a potent antifungal compound,and secondary metabolite analyses from Allium nigrum L.

The HPLC and spectral analyses of cysteine sulfoxides (CSOs), total polyphenols (TP), and total saponins revealed quantitative variations within the different organs of Allium nigrum L. A large accumulation of CSOs was detected in the bulb (0.367 mg/g fw), of TP in the leaf (116.05 mg CE/100 g fw), and of saponins in the root (19.38 mg/g dw). Phytochemical and chromatographical investigations of A. nigrum root extract led to the isolation of a spirostane-type glycoside or aginoside. The structure was elucidated by spectroscopic analysis (2D NMR, FABMS, HR-ESI-MS). The structure of the aginoside was identified as 25(R,S)-5α-spirostan-2α,3β,6β-trio1-3-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-O-[β-d-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)]-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-d-galactopyranoside. The highest content of aginoside, 2.9 mg/g dw, was detected in the root. The in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of aginoside was evaluated for the first time against phytopathogens. This compound showed significant (P < 0.05) antifungal activity depending on the concentration.     

Gibberellic Acid Induces Unique Molecular Responses in ‘Thompson Seedless’ Grapes as Revealed by Non-targeted Metabolomics

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation - Compact clusters and small berry size are the major problems associated with the commercialization of table grapes. The application of gibberellic acid 3 (GA3)...