Background
Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) bacteria are highly virulent, typically multidrug-resistant, opportunistic pathogens in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and other immunocompromised individuals. B. vietnamiensis is more often susceptible to aminoglycosides than other BCC species, and strains acquire aminoglycoside resistance during chronic CF infection and under tobramycin and azithromycin exposure in vitro, apparently from gain of antimicrobial efflux as determined through pump inhibition. The aims of the present study were to determine if oxidative stress could also induce aminoglycoside resistance and provide further observations in support of a role for antimicrobial efflux in aminoglycoside resistance in B. vietnamiensis.Findings
Here we identified hydrogen peroxide as an additional aminoglycoside resistance inducing agent in B. vietnamiensis. After antibiotic and hydrogen peroxide exposure, isolates accumulated significantly less [3H] gentamicin than the susceptible isolate from which they were derived. Strains that acquired aminoglycoside resistance during infection and after exposure to tobramycin or azithromycin overexpressed a putative resistance-nodulation-division (RND) transporter gene, amrB. Missense mutations in the repressor of amrB, amrR, were identified in isolates that acquired resistance during infection, and not in those generated in vitro.Conclusions
These data identify oxidative stress as an inducer of aminoglycoside resistance in B. vietnamiensis and further suggest that active efflux via a RND efflux system impairs aminoglycoside accumulation in clinical B. vietnamiensis strains that have acquired aminoglycoside resistance, and in those exposed to tobramycin and azithromycin, but not hydrogen peroxide, in vitro. Furthermore, the repressor AmrR is likely just one regulator of the putative AmrAB-OprM efflux system in B. vietnamiensis. 相似文献Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and Glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) are neurotrophic factors that play key roles in the auditory pathway. While the relationship between serum levels and polymorphisms of BDNF/GDNF and chronic tinnitus is emphasized in the literature, there is no study showing the link between the promoter methylations of these genes and tinnitus. For this purpose, the relationship between chronic tinnitus and peripheral blood derived BDNF/GDNF promoter methylations was investigated to identify their role in the pathophysiology of tinnitus. In this case–control study, we examined the possible effects of BDNF/GDNF methylations in the blood samples of patients with tinnitus complaints for more than 3 months. Sixty tinnitus subjects between the ages of 18–55 and 50 healthy control subjects in the same age group who were free of any otorhinolaryngology and systemic disease were selected for examination. Methylation of total 12 CpG sites in BDNF and GDNF promoter regions were determined by the bisulfite-pyrosequencing method. Statistically significant differences were detected between BDNF CpG6 and GDNF CpG3-5-6 methylation ratios in the comparison of control group and the chronic tinnitus patients (P?=?0.002, 0.0005, 0.00003, and 0.0029, respectively). To our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature investigating the relationship between chronic tinnitus and peripheral blood derived BDNF/GDNF promoter methylations. It is believed that the current results might be supported by investigating the relationships between BDNF/GDNF methylations and genotypes in future research using higher sample sizes.
相似文献