Galectin 9 is the sugar-regulated urate transporter/channel UAT

UAT, also designated galectin 9, is a multifunctional protein that can function as a urate channel/transporter, a regulator of thymocyte-epithelial cell interactions, a tumor antigen, an eosinophil chemotactic factor, and a mediator of apoptosis. We review the evidence that UAT is a transmembrane protein that transports urate, describe our molecular model for this protein, and discuss the evidence from epitope tag and lipid bilayer studies that support this model of the transporter. The properties of recombinant UAT are compared with those of urate transport into membrane vesicles derived from proximal tubule cells in rat kidney cortex. In addition, we review channel functions predicted by our molecular model that resulted in the novel finding that the urate channel activity is regulated by sugars and adenosine. Finally, the presence and possible functions of at least 4 isoforms of UAT and a closely related gene hUAT2 are discussed. Published in 2004.     

Cloning of the Zea mays controlling element Ac from the wx-m7 allele

Summary The cloning of the controlling element Ac from the wx-m7 allele of Zea mays is described. The cloned fragment carries a 4.3 kb insertion that by restriction analysis is indistinguishable from the Ac insertion in Ac wx-m9. It is located approximately 2.5 kb upstream of the Ac wx-m9 insertion. Offprint requests to: P. Starlinger     

Die thermischen Eigenschaften der faserig strukturierten Gebilde des tierischen Bewegungsapparates

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Distinct neurotrophic factors from skeletal muscle and the central nervous system interact synergistically to support the survival of cultured embryonic spinal motor neurons

Motor neurons isolated from 6-day-old embryonic chick spinal cords require muscle extract for survival in culture; however, it was found, that some motor neurons, identified by retrograde labeling with rhodamine, will survive in mixed spinal cell cultures in the absence of the extract. The motor neuron survival-promoting activity produced by spinal cells is soluble and differs from the factor present in muscle extract, the two activities acting in a synergistic manner: the spinal cell activity potentiated that of muscle to decrease its ED50 by an order of magnitude, the motor neuronal survival (30%) seen in the presence of both factors being more than the sum of their individual activities. This synergism was shown to be restricted to the action of the spinal cell factor on motor neurons, no effect of the factor being noted with sympathetic neurons. As a series of defined growth and survival factors present in the central nervous system (nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors) had no effect on motor neuron survival, we conclude that the molecule responsible for the motor neuron survival-promoting activity of the spinal cells is a previously undefined factor.     

The cellular interactions of laminin fragments. Cell adhesion correlates with two fragment-specific high affinity binding sites

The molecular interactions of laminin with several tumor cell lines and skin fibroblasts were investigated by radioligand binding studies and cell attachment assays using laminin, the laminin-nidogen complex, and laminin fragments as substrates and also domain-specific antibodies as inhibitors of cell attachment. The majority of cells showed a dual binding pattern for fragments 1 and 8 which originate from short-arm or long-arm structures of laminin, respectively. Both of these fragments in solution bind to suspended cells with high affinity (KD = 1-10 nM), with the receptor numbers for each fragment depending on the cell type. Competition studies and independent variation of receptor numbers demonstrated that the cell-binding structures on each fragment are different, implicating the existence of two distinct cellular receptors for laminin. The ability of these fragments to act as substrates for cell adhesion correlated with the presence of high affinity binding sites on the cells. However, only antibodies to fragment 8 were able to block cell adhesion to laminin, despite the presence of binding sites for fragment 1. A few cells had very low numbers of high affinity receptors for either fragment 1 or 8. The latter cell type was used to demonstrate that complex formation between laminin and nidogen, which binds to fragment 1 structures, reduces the potential of laminin for cell binding.