DNA-binding-defective mutants of the Epstein-Barr virus lytic switch activator Zta transactivate with altered specificities.

The Epstein-Barr virus BRLF1 and BZLF1 genes are the first viral genes transcribed upon induction of the viral lytic cycle. The protein products of both genes (referred to here as Rta and Zta, respectively) activate expression of other viral genes, thereby initiating the lytic cascade. Among the viral antigens expressed upon induction of the lytic cycle, however, Zta is unique in its ability to disrupt viral latency; expression of the BZLF1 gene is both necessary and sufficient for triggering the viral lytic cascade. We have previously shown that Zta can activate its own promoter (Zp), through binding to two Zta recognition sequences (ZIIIA and ZIIIB). Here we describe mutant Zta proteins that do not bind DNA (referred to as Zta DNA-binding mutants [Zdbm]) but retain the ability to transactivate Zp. Consistent with the inability of these mutants to bind DNA, transactivation of Zp by Zdbm is not dependent on the Zta recognition sequences. Instead, transactivation by Zdbm is dependent upon promoter elements that bind cellular factors. An examination of other viral and cellular promoters identified promoters that are weakly responsive or unresponsive to Zdbm. An analysis of a panel of artificial promoters containing one copy of various promoter elements demonstrated a specificity for Zdbm activation that is distinct from that of Zta. These results suggest that non-DNA-binding forms of some transactivators retain the ability to transactivate specific target promoters without direct binding to DNA.     

Cell cycle analysis of Epstein-Barr virus-infected cells following treatment with lytic cycle-inducing agents

While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latency-associated gene expression is associated with cell cycle progression, the relationship between the EBV lytic program and the cell cycle is less clear. Using four different EBV lytic induction systems, we address the relationship between lytic cycle activation and the cell cycle. In three of these systems, G0 or G1 cell growth arrest signaling is observed prior to detection of the EBV immediate-early gene product Zta. In tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate-treated P3HR1 cultures and in 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine-treated NPC-KT cultures, cell cycle analysis of Zta-expressing cell populations showed a significant G1 bias during the early stages of lytic cycle progression. In contrast, treatment of the cell line Akata with anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) results in rapid induction of immediate-early gene expression, and accordingly, activation of the immediate-early gene product Zta precedes significant anti-Ig-induced cell cycle effects. Nevertheless, cell cycle analysis of the Zta-expressing population following anti-Ig treatment shows a bias for cells in G1, indicating that anti-Ig-mediated induction of Zta occurs more efficiently in cells traversing G1. Last, although 5-azacytidine treatment of Rael cells results in a G1 arrest in the total cell population which precedes the induction of Zta, cell cycle analysis of the Zta-expressing population shows a significant bias for cells with an apparent G2/M DNA content. This bias may result, in part, from activation of Zta expression following demethylation of the Zta promoter during S-phase. Together, these studies indicate that induction of Zta occurs through several distinct mechanisms, some of which may involve checkpoint signaling.     

Distinct cellular factors regulate the c-myb promoter through its E2F element

Most E2F-driven promoters are transiently activated around the G(1)/S transition. Although the promoter for the c-myb proto-oncogene harbors an E2F element, it is induced early in G(1) following entry into the cell cycle. Furthermore, this promoter remains active throughout subsequent cell cycles. Since E2F sites function as repressor elements during G(1) (due to the association of pRb with E2F factors), we investigated whether the E2F element in the c-myb promoter is regulated differently than E2F elements in promoters that are repressed during G(1). By gel shift analysis, the E2F element from the c-myb promoter was found to form a unique complex, referred to as E2Fmyb-sp, which was not observed with E2F elements from several other promoters. Antibodies to DP-1, E2F1 to -5, p107, or pRb failed to either supershift or block E2Fmyb-sp complex formation. Methylation interference experiments indicate that the DNA contact residues for the E2Fmyb-sp complex are distinct from but overlapping with residues required for the binding of E2F proteins. In addition to the identification of E2Fmyb-sp, we have found that SP-1 binds to the c-myb E2F element. Functional studies revealed that E2Fmyb-sp and/or SP-1 are required to achieve full activation of the c-myb promoter in different cell types and to maintain elevated expression of the c-myb promoter during G(1) in NIH 3T3 cells. These studies demonstrate that E2F elements can be regulated differently through the binding of unique sets of proteins.