Effect of the Duration of the Vegetative Phase on Shoot Growth, Development and Yield in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke)

Craufurd, P. Q. and Bidinger, F. R. 1988. Effect of the durationof the vegetative phase on shoot growth, development and yieldin pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke).–J.exp. Bot. 38: 124–139 The duration of the vegetative phase (DVP) in millet, whichis the major cause of variation in the crop duration, has markedeffects on the number of productive tillers per plant and onmainshoot (MS) and tiller grain yield. Daylength extensionswere used to vary the DVP and the effect on factors affectingpanicle (tiller) number per plant and panicle yield examinedin millet hybrid 841A x J104, grown in the field at Hyderabad,India. Tiller appearance, shoot leaf appearance and leaf area,and stem and panicle growth, in both MS and primary tillers(PTs), were monitored at frequent intervals over the season.At maturity grain yield per shoot was measured The concept of thermal time was used to describe shoot development.The rates of tiller appearance and shoot leaf appearance werelinearly related to thermal time and were not affected by DVPtreatments. The duration of the growth phase from panicle initiationto flowering (GS2) and from flowering to maturity (GS3) was320 and 390 degree days (°Cd), respectively. There was nodifference in rates of leaf or tiller appearance or developmentbetween MS and PTs. Tiller appearance, tiller leaf appearanceand tiller apical development all ceased at the same time inthe later initiated PTs, approximately 550 °Cd from sowing,shortly after rapid stem growth had begun. Tillers that didnot survive were all vegetative or in the early stages of reproductivedevelopment at this time The rate of accumulation of dry matter per plant was similarin all DVP treatments, but in the longer DVP treatments a greaterproportion of the dry matter was partitioned to the MS. Mainshootstem and panicle growth rates were increased by a longer DVP,as was grain yield on the MS, and these were related to increasedMS leaf area. Concurrently, growth rates and yields in laterinitiated tillers were reduced in relation to their leaf areas.Stem growth rate was proportionately increased more than paniclegrowth rate in the longer DVP treatments and this, combinedwith a longer duration of stem growth, resulted in greater stemdry matter at maturity and, therefore, in reduced harvest index.     

Effects of Photoperiod, Temperature and Asynchrony between Thermoperiod and Photoperiod on Development to Panicle Initiation in Sorghum

The duration of the vegetative phase (i.e. days from sowingto panicle initiation) in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]is affected by photoperiod and temperature. Plants of severalcontrasting genotypes of sorghum were grown in controlled-environmentgrowth cabinets with either synchronous or asynchronous photoperiodsand thermoperiods. Apical development was recorded. Diurnalasynchrony between photoperiod and thermoperiod reduced durationsto panicle initiation when the temperature warmed after lightswent on and cooled after lights went off, but increased thesedurations when the temperature warmed before lights went onand cooled before lights went off. These effects were shownin the maturity lines 60M and SM100 and also in the USA cv.RS610 and the Sudanese landrace IS22365, but their magnitudevaried with genotype, photothermal regime, and the degree ofasynchrony. The greatest effect was detected in IS22365 grownat 30/21 °C (12 h/12 h) with a 12 h d^-1photoperiod whenthe temperature warmed 2.5 h before lights went on and cooled2.5 h before lights went off, when the duration from sowingto panicle initiation was 69 d compared with 37 d in the control(synchronous photoperiod and thermoperiod in each diurnal cycle). Reciprocal transfers of plants of IS22365 between short andlong days revealed that asynchrony principally affected theduration of the photoperiod-insensitive pre-inductive phaseof development; i.e. asynchrony affected the time (age) at whichthe plants were first able to respond to photoperiod. In thatinvestigation in controlled-environment growth chambers, thesubsequent photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase continued untilpanicle initiation. Subsequent reciprocal transfer experimentsin controlled-environment glasshouses in four different alternatingtemperature regimes employed synchronous photoperiods and thermoperiodsin short (11 h) days with temperature warming 1.5 h after thebeginning of the day in long (12.5 h) days. In those investigations,photoperiod sensitivity ended some time before (2.5–8.1d, mean 5.7 d) panicle initiation in IS22365, Naga White andSeredo. Moreover, whereas the duration of the photoperiod-insensitivepre-inductive phase was affected by temperature, the durationsof the photoperiod-sensitive inductive and the photoperiod-insensitivepost-inductive phases were not. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench; sorghum; asynchrony; photoperiod; thermoperiod; vegetative phase; panicle initiation     

Fruit Number in Relation to Pollen Production and Viability in Groundnut Exposed to Short Episodes of Heat Stress

Hot days and warm nights are important environmental factorslimiting fruit yields of groundnuts in the semi-arid tropics.The objective of the present research was to quantify the effectsof short episodes of heat stress on pollen production and viability,and fruit yield. Plants of cultivar ‘ICGV 86015’were grown at a day/night temperature of 28/22 °C from sowinguntil 9 d after flowering. Cohorts of plants were then exposedto a factorial combination of four day (28, 34, 42 and 48 °C)and two night (22 and 28 °C) temperatures for 6 d. Thereafter,all plants were maintained at 28/22 °C until final harvest9 d later. Number of flowers per plant (FN), the proportionof flowers setting pegs (fruit-set), the number of pegs andpods per plant (reproductive number, RN_t), pollen productionper flower and pollen viability were determined during the 6d stress period. There were strong negative linear relationsbetween day temperature over the range of 28 to 48 °C andFN (slope, -1.1 °C^-1), fruit-set (-2.8% °C^-1), RN_t(-0.90°C^-1), and pollen production (-390 °C^-1) and viability(-1.9% °C^-1). Warmer night temperature (28 vs. 22 °C)had no effect on FN, but reduced fruit-set (31 to 19%), RN_t(8to 5), and pollen production (4389 to 2800) and viability (49to 40%). There were no significant interactions between dayand night temperature. Reduced fruit-set was a consequence offewer pollen grains and reduced pollen viability. The thresholdday temperature for pollen production and viability was 34 °Cand there were strong negative linear relations between bothpollen production and pollen viability and accumulated temperature>34 °C. Copyright 1999 Annals of Botany Company Arachis hypogaea L., fruit-set, groundnut, heat-stress, peanut, pollen viability, pollen production, temperature.     

Response of in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes to temperature

Air temperatures of greater than 35 °C are frequently encountered in groundnut‐growing regions, especially in the semi‐arid tropics. Such extreme temperatures are likely to increase in frequency under future predicted climates. High air temperatures result in failure of peg and pod set due to lower pollen viability. The response of pollen germination and pollen tube growth to temperature was quantified in order to identify differences in pollen tolerance to temperature among 21 groundnut genotypes. Plants were grown from sowing to harvest in a poly‐tunnel under an optimum temperature of 28/22 °C (day/night). Pollen was collected at anther dehiscence and was exposed to temperatures from 10° to 47·5 °C at 2·5 °C intervals. The results showed that a modified bilinear model most accurately described the response to temperature of percentage pollen germination and maximum pollen tube length. Genotypes were found to range from most tolerant to most susceptible based on both pollen characters and membrane thermostability. Mean cardinal temperatures (T_min, T_opt and T_max) averaged over 21 genotypes were 14·1, 30·1 and 43·0 °C for percentage pollen germination and 14·6, 34·4 and 43·4 °C for maximum pollen tube length. The genotypes 55‐437, ICG 1236, TMV 2 and ICGS 11 can be grouped as tolerant to high temperature and genotypes Kadiri 3, ICGV 92116 and ICGV 92118 as susceptible genotypes, based on the cardinal temperatures. The principal component analysis identified maximum percentage pollen germination and pollen tube length of the genotypes, and T_max for the two processes as the most important pollen parameters in describing a genotypic tolerance to high temperature. The T_min and T_opt for pollen germination and tube growth, rate of pollen tube growth were less predictive in discriminating genotypes for high temperature tolerance. Genotypic differences in heat tolerance‐based on pollen response were poorly related (R² = 0·334, P = 0·006) to relative injury as determined by membrane thermostability.     

Heat tolerance in cowpea: effect of timing and duration of heat stress

Reproductive processes and pod yield in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp), an important crop grown in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa, are adversely affected by high temperature. Genotypic differences in heat tolerance have been identified under hot, long-days, but it was not known if this tolerance is also exhibited in hot, short-day environments typical of sub-Saharan Africa. The objectives of the work reported here were to determine whether heat tolerance identified under hot, long-days was expressed at the same stages of development under hot, short-days, and whether responsiveness to temperature was additive and quantitative. A heat-tolerant (Prima) and heat-susceptible (IT84S-2246) cultivar of cowpea were grown in controlled environments under short-days (12 h day^-1), initially at 30°C/24°C (Mod-T), and then transferred at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 days after emergence (DAE) to 36°C/27°C (High-T), where they remained for 5, 10 or 20 days duration before returning to Mod-T. Control plants remained at Mod-T or High-T for 50 days, when the first pods were mature and the experiment was terminated. There were significant effects of duration (D) and timing (T) (P < 0.001), and interactions between D × T (P < 0.001), T × genotype (G) (P < 0.01) and D × T × G (P < 0.05) on pod weight plant^-1. Prima was significantly (P < 0.001) more tolerant to high temperature during flowering than IT84S-2246, confirming that heat tolerance was expressed under hot, short days. The greater heat tolerance of Prima was associated with an ability to maintain peduncle and flower production at High-T, and with greater podset. The sensitive period in IT84S-2246 started at floral bud initiation (15–20 DAE), and effects of High-T thereafter were additive and quantitative.     

Effect of Photoperiod and Chlormequat on Apical Development and Growth in a Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivar

Spring wheat, cv. Timmo, was grown under three photoperiod regimes(16, 13 and 11 h) with and without treatment with the plantgrowth regulator chlormequat (applied at the glume primordiumstage of apical development) and the relationships between apicaldevelopment, primordium initiation and growth stage examined The effects of photoperiod were generally similar to those reportedfrom other studies; shorter photoperiod slowed the rate of apicaldevelopment, increased the duration of the primordium initiationphases and reduced the rate of primordium initiation. The finalnumber of spikelets was increased, but there was no effect onnumber of floret primordia per spikelet The number of tillersproduced was also higher in the shorter photoperiods. Chlormequattreatment had a similar effect to imposing short-days: floweringwas delayed and tiller production increased There were strong correlations between certain development eventsand the phasing of primordium initiation and growth stages andthese were not affected by photoperiod or chlormequat treatments.For example, the end of spikelet primordium initiation, i.e.terminal spikelet (TS) formation, coincided with the floret-stamenprimordium stage (of the most advanced spikelet) and the endof floret primordium initiation with the stigma tic branchesand hairs on ovary wall elongating stage. Similarly, rapid stemextension growth always started at TS formation while spikeextension and spike growth commenced at TS formation and thestigmatic branches stage, respectively. Tiller production alsoceased at TS formation, when rapid stem growth started Although the timing of the phases of primordium initiation andcertain growth events were linked to apical development, therate of apical development did not determine either the rateof spikelet primordium initiation or the rates of stem and eargrowth. However, there was a strong relationship between rateof development and rate of floret primordium initiation. Therewas also a strong relationship between spike length and apicaldevelopment stage Triticum aestivum, spring wheat, photoperiod, chlormequat, apical development, primordium initiation, stem and spike growth