Coping with predators and food limitation: testing life history theory for sex–specific larval development

For animals with complex life cycles, recent models of sexual size-dimorphism at maturity assume three key variables to optimise larval life history: activity in the larval stage, development time, and size at maturation. However, model predictions remain largely untested. In the territorial dragonfly Libellula depressa (Odonata) exhibiting a flexible development time we tested for male-biased sexual size-dimorphism and sex differences in larval activity, development time, and growth rate. Based on models we predicted that males achieved their larger size compared to females by a longer development rather than being more active. Results revealed that males took longer to develop and achieved a larger size than females but were not more active. Compared to males, females exhibited a higher growth rate which was not achieved by an activity-mediated increased food intake. We conclude that sexual size-dimorphism in species with a flexible development time is mediated by differences in developmental length but not activity. Furthermore, sexes differ in their plastic responses to food availability and predator presence making it necessary to consider sex-specific differences in testing further life history responses.