Structural and thermodynamic studies of Bergerac-SH3 chimeras

Bergerac-type chimeras of spectrin SH3 were designed by extending a β-hairpin by eight amino acids so that the extension protruded from the domain body like a “nose” being exposed to the solvent. A calorimetric study of several Bergerac-SH3 variants was carried out over a wide range of pH values and protein concentrations and the three-dimensional structure of one of them, SHH, was determined. X-ray studies confirmed that the nose had a well defined β-structure whilst the chimera formed a stable tetramer within the crystal unit because of four tightly packed noses. In the pH range of 4–7 the heat-induced unfolding of some chimeras was complex and concentration dependent, whilst at pH values below 3.5, low protein concentrations of all the chimeras studied, including SHH, seemed to obey a monomolecular two-state unfolding model. The best set of data was obtained for the SHA variant, the unfolding heat effects of which were systematically higher than those of the WT protein (about 16.4 kJ/mol at 323 K), which may be close to the upper limit of the enthalpy gain due to 10 residue β-hairpin folding. At the same time, the chimeras with high nose stability, which, like SHH, have a hydrophobic (IVY) cluster on their surface, showed a lower apparent unfolding heat effect, much closer to that of the WT protein. The possible reasons for this difference are discussed.     

Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of sphingomyelinases D and evolutionary relationship to glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterases

Spider venom sphingomyelinases D catalyze the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin via an Mg(2+) ion-dependent acid-base catalytic mechanism which involves two histidines. In the crystal structure of the sulfate free enzyme determined at 1.85A resolution, the metal ion is tetrahedrally coordinated instead of the trigonal-bipyramidal coordination observed in the sulfate bound form. The observed hyperpolarized state of His47 requires a revision of the previously suggested catalytic mechanism. Molecular modeling indicates that the fundamental structural features important for catalysis are fully conserved in both classes of SMases D and that the Class II SMases D contain an additional intra-chain disulphide bridge (Cys53-Cys201). Structural analysis suggests that the highly homologous enzyme from Loxosceles bonetti is unable to hydrolyze sphingomyelin due to the 95Gly-->Asn and 134Pro-->Glu mutations that modify the local charge and hydrophobicity of the interfacial face. Structural and sequence comparisons confirm the evolutionary relationship between sphingomyelinases D and the glicerophosphodiester phosphoesterases which utilize a similar catalytic mechanism.     

Crystal structures of mutant ribosomal proteins L1

Nine mutant ribosomal proteins L1 from the bacterium Thermus thermophilus and archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii were obtained and their crystal structures were determined and analyzed. The structure of the S179C TthL1 mutant, determined earlier, was also analyzed. In half of the proteins studied, point mutations of the amino acid residues exposed on the protein surface essentially changed the spatial structure of the protein. This proves that a correct study of biological processes with the help of site-directed mutagenesis requires a preliminary determination or, at least, modeling of the structures of mutant proteins. A detailed comparison of the structures of the L1 mutants and the corresponding wild-type L1 proteins demonstrated that the side chain of a mutated amino acid residue tends to adopt a location similar to that of the side chain of the corresponding residue in the wild-type protein. This observation assists in modeling the structure of mutant proteins.     

Ribosomal protein L1 recognizes the same specific structural motif in its target sites on the autoregulatory mRNA and 23S rRNA

The RNA-binding ability of ribosomal protein L1 is of profound interest since the protein has a dual function as a ribosomal protein binding rRNA and as a translational repressor binding its mRNA. Here, we report the crystal structure of ribosomal protein L1 in complex with a specific fragment of its mRNA and compare it with the structure of L1 in complex with a specific fragment of 23S rRNA determined earlier. In both complexes, a strongly conserved RNA structural motif is involved in L1 binding through a conserved network of RNA–protein H-bonds inaccessible to the solvent. These interactions should be responsible for specific recognition between the protein and RNA. A large number of additional non-conserved RNA–protein H-bonds stabilizes both complexes. The added contribution of these non-conserved H-bonds makes the ribosomal complex much more stable than the regulatory one.