排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 4 毫秒
1
1.
Mariscal Carlos Barahona Ana Aubert-Kato Nathanael Aydinoglu Arsev Umur Bartlett Stuart Cárdenas María Luz Chandru Kuhan Cleland Carol Cocanougher Benjamin T. Comfort Nathaniel Cornish-Bowden Athel Deacon Terrence Froese Tom Giovannelli Donato Hernlund John Hut Piet Kimura Jun Maurel Marie-Christine Merino Nancy Moreno Alvaro Nakagawa Mayuko Peretó Juli Virgo Nathaniel Witkowski Olaf James Cleaves H. 《Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere》2019,49(3):111-145
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres - In this review, we describe some of the central philosophical issues facing origins-of-life research and provide a targeted history of the developments... 相似文献
2.
Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions 总被引:10,自引:0,他引:10
Background
Scientific research in the 21st century is more data intensive and collaborative than in the past. It is important to study the data practices of researchers – data accessibility, discovery, re-use, preservation and, particularly, data sharing. Data sharing is a valuable part of the scientific method allowing for verification of results and extending research from prior results.Methodology/Principal Findings
A total of 1329 scientists participated in this survey exploring current data sharing practices and perceptions of the barriers and enablers of data sharing. Scientists do not make their data electronically available to others for various reasons, including insufficient time and lack of funding. Most respondents are satisfied with their current processes for the initial and short-term parts of the data or research lifecycle (collecting their research data; searching for, describing or cataloging, analyzing, and short-term storage of their data) but are not satisfied with long-term data preservation. Many organizations do not provide support to their researchers for data management both in the short- and long-term. If certain conditions are met (such as formal citation and sharing reprints) respondents agree they are willing to share their data. There are also significant differences and approaches in data management practices based on primary funding agency, subject discipline, age, work focus, and world region.Conclusions/Significance
Barriers to effective data sharing and preservation are deeply rooted in the practices and culture of the research process as well as the researchers themselves. New mandates for data management plans from NSF and other federal agencies and world-wide attention to the need to share and preserve data could lead to changes. Large scale programs, such as the NSF-sponsored DataNET (including projects like DataONE) will both bring attention and resources to the issue and make it easier for scientists to apply sound data management principles. 相似文献3.
This study explores the collaborative nature and interdisciplinarity of the origin(s) of life (OoL) research community. Although OoL research is one of the oldest topics in philosophy, religion, and science; to date there has been no review of the field utilizing bibliometric measures. A dataset of 5647 publications that are tagged as OoL, astrobiology, exobiology, and prebiotic chemistry is analyzed. The most prolific authors (Raulin, Ehrenfreund, McKay, Cleaves, Cockell, Lazcano, etc.), most cited scholars and their articles (Miller 1953, Gilbert 1986, Chyba & Sagan 1992, W?chtersh?user 1988, etc.), and popular journals (Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres and Astrobiology) for OoL research are identified. Moreover, interdisciplinary research conducted through research networks, institutions (NASA, Caltech, University of Arizona, University of Washington, CNRS, etc.), and keywords & concepts (astrobiology, life, Mars, amino acid, prebiotic chemistry, evolution, RNA) are explored. 相似文献
1