Mouse and rat cells undergo rapidly inducible changes in polypeptide secretion following infection with Kirsten murine sarcoma virus

Characteristic changes in the secreted polypeptides of Kirsten murine sarcoma virus (KiMSV) transformed mouse and rat cell lines could be detected 48 hours after infection of phenotypically normal cells with this virus and correlated with detection of the KiMSV encoded polypeptide p21.     

Chromosomes and their relationship to nuclear components during the cell cycle in Chinese hamster cells

Summary Chromosomes and their relationship to nuclear components during various phases of the cell cycle were studied with different fixation, embedding, and enzyme techniques. The results showed that interphase chromosomes may have oriented in such a way that a given locus became associated with the nuclear membrane. Some chromosomes also appeared to interact with the nucleolus. The nuclear matrix materials, however, were distributed between the chromosomes and formed a delineating boundary for the chromosomes. These matrix materials, furthermore, formed channel-like structures within the nucleus and towards the cytoplasm through their interaction with nuclear pore complexes. During mitosis, chromosomes were encapsulated with material that appeared to be derived from the matrix, disintegrated residues and fragments of the nuclear envelope, the lamina, and nucleolar material. These chromosome-associated materials seen in mitosis appeared to serve as foci for formation of new nuclear components in subsequent interphase.     

Affinity of chromatin constituents for isopeptidase

Isopeptidase is a novel eukaryotic enzyme that cleaves a structural chromatin protein, A24, stoichiometrically into H2A and ubiquitin. To understand the rapid turnover of ubiquitin in mitosis as wells as the high specific activity of the enzyme associated with metaphase chromosomes, attempts were made to determine chromatin constituents that show high affinity for this enzyme. Endogenous protease-free isopeptidase was prepared from calf thymus and applied to a Sepharose 4B affinity column on which histones, DNA, NHCP and ubiquitin were respectively immobilized. The enzyme proved to bind only histones. To further determine which of the histone fractions is involved, affinity columns with each histone fraction were also used. The enzyme showed affinity for all histone fractions. However, the strength of affinity varied in the order H2A>H³ H2B≥H4?H1, being inversely correlated with the ratio of basic/acidic amino acids in these molecules. These results suggest that the turnover of A24 in mitosis is controlled, at least in part, by the affinity of enzyme for histones, and also that such affinity is caused by a mechanism which cannot be explained simply by the electrostatic interaction between negatively charged enzyme molecules and positively charged histones.     

An analysis of the ribosomal ribonucleic acids of Escherichia coli by hybridization techniques

From analyses of the hybridization of Escherichia coli rRNA (ribosomal RNA) to homologous denatured DNA, the following conclusions were drawn. (1) When a fixed amount of DNA was hybridized with increasing amounts of RNA, only 0.35+/-0.02% of E. coli DNA was capable of binding (16s+23s) rRNA. Although preparations of 16s and 23s rRNA were virtually free from cross-contamination, the hybridization curves for purified 16s or 23s rRNA were almost identical with that of the parent specimen containing 1 weight unit of 16s rRNA mixed with 2 weight units of 23s rRNA. The 16s and 23s rRNA also competed effectively for the same specific DNA sites. It appears that these RNA species each possess all hybridizing species typical of the parent (16s+23s) rRNA specimen, though probably in different relative amounts. (2) By using hybridization-efficiency analysis of DNA-RNA hybridization curves (Avery & Midgley, 1969) it was found that (a) 0.45% of the DNA would hybridize total rRNA and (b) when so little RNA was added to unit weight of DNA that the DNA sites were not saturated, only 70-75% of the input RNA would form hybrids. The reasons for the discrepancy between the results obtained by the two alternative analytical approaches were discussed. (3) For either 16s or 23s rRNA, hybridization analysis indicated that two principal weight fractions of rRNA may exist, hybridizing to two distinct groups of DNA sites. However, these groups seem to be incompletely divided between the 16s and 23s fractions. Analysis suggested that (a) 85% of the 16s rRNA was hybridized to about half the DNA that specifically binds rRNA (0.23% of the total DNA). (b) 70% of the 23s rRNA hybridized to a further 0.23% of the DNA and (c) the minor fraction (15%) of 16s rRNA may be competitive with the major fraction (70%) of 23s rRNA. Conversely, the minor fraction (30%) of the 23s rRNA may compete with the major fraction (85%) of 16s rRNA. Models were proposed to explain the apparent lack of segregation of distinct RNA species in the two subfractions of rRNA. (4) If protein synthesis and ribosome maturation were inhibited in cells of an RC(rel) mutant, E. coli W 1665, by depriving them of an amino acid (methionine) essential for growth, the inhibition had no discernible effect on the relative rates of synthesis of rRNA species. The rRNA that accumulates in RC(rel) strains of E. coli after amino acid deprivation is apparently identical in its content of RNA species with that of the pre-existing mature RNA in the ribosomes. On the other hand, the messenger RNA is stabilized, and accumulates as about 15% of the RNA formed after withdrawal of the amino acid.     

CHROMOSOME PULVERIZATION IN HUMAN BINUCLEATE CELLS FOLLOWING COLCEMID TREATMENT

Under the influence of Colcemid, a substantial number of binucleate human cells from a line infected with herpes-like virus was found to possess pulverized chromosomes. Although this abnormality was also detected in untreated binucleate cells, the increase in the number of pulverized cells after the addition of Colcemid was too striking to be explained by accumulation of spontaneously occurring cells in response to the mitotic inhibition by Colcemid. Furthermore, the induction of pulverization may be dependent upon Colcemid concentration. These findings imply an involvement of Colcemid in the mechanism of pulverization induction in the system studied. When tritiated thymidine was added to the culture medium simultaneously with Colcemid, the majority of binucleate cells with an intact and a pulverized chromosome set incorporated this isotope into the pulverized set only. This obviously suggests that the nuclei in the binucleate cell are asynchronous in DNA synthesis, and that this asynchrony is intimately related to the induction of the pulverization phenomenon. It seems very probable that the late S phase in the late synthesizing nuclei represents a critical stage at which damage to the chromosomes most readily occurs.     

Growth-regulator Interactions in the Growth of the Shoot System of Avena sativa Seedlings: I. THE GROWTH OF THE FIRST INTERNODE

1. Segments, 3.5 mm. long, cut from the first internode of Avenasativa seedlings grown in complete darkness respond to bothauxins and gibberellic acid by accelerated extension. 2. The optimum concentration of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is10 p.p.m. and of gibberellic acid (GA) is 0.1 p.p.m. 3. The degree of stimulation relative to the growth of controlsegments is affected by the inclusion in the segement of thenode between the internode and coleoptile. Thus the gibberellineffect is greatly increased while the IAA effect is decreased.The optimal concentrations are not affected by inclusion ofthe node. 4. These results can best be explained in terms of the supplyby the node tissue of an endogenous auxin which is necessaryfor the expression of GA action. 5. Numerous factorial experiments demonstrated that there isno detectable interaction between applied IAA and GA in thepromotion of first-internode extension. This implies that thepostulated endogenous auxin which synergized GAA action in (4)is either an active form of IAA produced only in the node tissueor is a completely different auxin. 6. No synergism of growth-promotive action can be detected betweenGA and the two synthetic auxins I-naphthylacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyaceticacid. 7. p-chlorophenoxy-iso-butyric acid (PCIB) anc 2,4,6-trichlorophenoxyaceticacid (2,4,6-T) act as weak auxins and thus antagonize competitivelythe promotive action of GA. 8. The anti-auxin -(I-naphythyl-methyl-sulphide)propionic acid(NMSP) antagonizes competitively the promotive action of bothIAA and GA. 9. The facts under (5)–(8) suggest that auxins and GAare acting at the same growth-promotion centres and may competefor them. 10. Growth inhibitions are induced by high concentrations ofPCIB, 2,4,6-T and NMSP. The inhibitions produced by PCIB and2,4,6-T are both synergized by supra-optimal concentrationsof IAA while that of NMSP is synergized by supra-optimal concentrationsof both IAA and GA. This similarity of the effects of IAA andGA suggests that their inhibition actions also are of a closelysimilar nature.