New Insights into the Role of the Maize Ameiotic1 Locus

In maize the am1-1 mutant allele results in both the male and female meiocytes undergoing mitosis in place of the meiotic divisions. A second mutant allele am1-praI enables both the male and female meiocytes to proceed to the early zygotene stage of meiotic prophase I before being blocked. Here we report on three new alleles that allow all male meiocytes to undergo mitosis but in female meiocytes approximately one quarter (am1-2), one half (am1-485), or all (am1-489) of them are blocked at an abnormal interphase stage. Previous analysis has shown that am1-praI is dominant to am1-1 in male meiocytes. Cytological analysis of heteroallelic combinations in female meiocytes now indicates a dominance relationship of am1-praI > am1-1 > am1-2/am1-485 > am1-489. The evidence provided by the female phenotypes of the new mutant alleles suggest that, whereas the normal am1 allele is required for the meiocytes to proceed through meiosis, a partially functional allele may be required for their diversion into a mitotic division. The partial or complete blockage of mitosis in female meiocytes carrying the new am1 alleles rules out the possibility that the mitotic division of mutant meiocytes reflects a simple default pathway for cells that cannot initiate meiosis. This locus may have a dual function.     

Effects of several meiotic mutations on female meiosis in maize

A modified enzyme digestion technique of ovary isolation followed by staining and squash preparation has allowed us to observe female meiosis in normal maize meiotically dividing megaspore mother cells (MMCs). The first meiotic division in megasporogenesis of maize is not distinguishable from that in mi-crosporogenesis. The second female meiotic division is characterized as follows: (1) the two products of the first meiotic division do not simultaneously enter into the second meiotic division; as a rule, the chalazal-most cell enters division earlier than the micropylar one, (2) often the second of the two products does not proceed with meiosis, but degenerates, and (3) only a single haploid meiotic product of the tetrad remains alive, and this cell proceeds with three rounds of mitoses without any intervening cell wall formation to produce the eight-nucleate embryo sac. This technique has allowed us to study the effects of five meiotic mutations (aml, aml-pral, afdl, dsy *-9101, and dvl) on female meiosis in maize. The effects of the two alleles of the aml gene (aml and aml-pral) and of the afdl and dsy *-9101mutations are the same in both male and female meiosis. The aml allele prevents the entrance of MMCs into meiosis and meiosis is replaced by mitosis; the aml-pral permits MMCs to enter into meiosis, but their progress is stopped at early prophase I stages. The afdl gene is responsible for substitution of the first meiotic (reductional) division by an equational division including the segregation of sister chromatid centromeres at anaphase I. The dsy * -9101 gene exhibits abnormal chromosome pairing; paired homologous chromosomes are visible at pachytene, but only univalents are observed at diakinesis and metaphase I stages. These mutation specific patterns of abnormal meiosis are responsible for the bisexual sterility of these meiotic mutants. The abnormal divergent shape of the spindle apparatus and the resulting abnormal segregation of homologous chromosomes observed in micro-sporogenesis in plants homozygous for the dv1 mutation have not been found in meiosis of megasporogenesis. Only male sterility is induced by the dv1 gene in the homozygous condition. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Synthesis and Deposition of Callose in Anthers and Ovules of Meiotic Mutants of Maize (Zea mays)

The pattern of callose deposition was studied in anthers and ovules of three meiotic mutants of Zea mays L. The synthesis of the callose wall in sporogenous cells was related to their transfer to meiotic division.     

The Mac1 Gene: Controlling the Commitment to the Meiotic Pathway in Maize

The switch from the vegetative to the reproductive pathway of development in flowering plants requires the commitment of the subepidermal cells of the ovules and anthers to enter the meiotic pathway. These cells, the hypodermal cells, either directly or indirectly form the archesporial cells that, in turn, differentiate into the megasporocytes and microsporocytes. We have isolated a recessive pleiotropic mutation that we have termed multiple archesporial cells1 (mac1) and located it to the short arm of chromosome 10. Its cytological phenotype suggests that this locus plays an important role in the switch of the hypodermal cells from the vegetative to the meiotic (sporogenous) pathway in maize ovules. During normal ovule development in maize, only a single hypodermal cell develops into an archesporial cell and this differentiates into the single megasporocyte. In mac1 mutant ovules several hypodermal cells develop into archesporial cells, and the resulting megasporocytes undergo a normal meiosis. More than one megaspore survives in the tetrad and more than one embryo sac is formed in each ovule. Ears on mutant plants show partial sterility resulting from abnormalities in megaspore differentiation and embryo sac formation. The sporophytic expression of this gene is therefore also important for normal female gametophyte development.     

The Role of the Ameiotic1 Gene in the Initiation of Meiosis and in Subsequent Meiotic Events in Maize

Understanding the initiation of meiosis and the relationship of this event with other key cytogenetic processes are major goals in studying the genetic control of meiosis in higher plants. Our genetic and structural analysis of two mutant alleles of the ameiotic1 gene (am1 and am1-praI) suggest that this locus plays an essential role in the initiation of meiosis in maize. The product of the ameiotic1 gene affects an earlier stage in the meiotic sequence than any other known gene in maize and is important for the irreversible commitment of cells to meiosis and for crucial events marking the passage from premeiotic interphase into prophase I including chromosome synapsis. It appears that the period of ameiotic1 gene function in meiosis at a minimum covers the interval from some point during premeiotic interphase until the early zygotene stage of meiosis. To study the interaction of genes in the progression of meiosis, several double meiotic mutants were constructed. In these double mutants (i) the ameiotic1 mutant allele was brought together with the meiotic mutation (afd1) responsible for the fixation of centromeres in meiosis; and with the mutant alleles of the three meiotic genes that control homologous chromosome segregation (dv1, ms43 and ms28), which impair microtubule organizing center organization, the orientation of the spindle fiber apparatus, and the depolymerization of spindle filaments after the first meiotic division, respectively; (ii) the afd1 mutation was combined with two mutations (dsy1 and as1) affecting homologous pairing; (iii) the ms43 mutation was combined with the as1, the ms28 and the dv1 mutations; and (iv) the ms28 mutation was combined with the dv1 mutation and the ms4 (polymitotic1) mutations. An analysis of gene interaction in the double mutants led us to conclude that the ameiotic1 gene is epistatic over the afd1, the dv1, the ms43 and the ms28 genes but the significance of this relationship requires further analysis. The afd gene appears to function from premeiotic interphase throughout the first meiotic division, but it is likely that its function begins after the start of the ameiotic1 gene expression. The afd1 gene is epistatic over the two synaptic mutations dsy1 and as1 and also over the dv1 mutation. The new ameiotic*-485 and leptotene arrest*-487 mutations isolated from an active ROBERTSON's Mutator stocks take part in the control of the initiation of meiosis.