Surrogate modeling of articular cartilage degradation to understand the synergistic role of MMP-1 and MMP-9: a case study

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology - A characteristic feature of arthritic diseases is cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, often orchestrated by the overexpression of matrix...     

Role of gastrocnemius activation in knee joint biomechanics: gastrocnemius acts as an ACL antagonist

Gastrocnemius is a premier muscle crossing the knee, but its role in knee biomechanics and on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remains less clear when compared to hamstrings and quadriceps. The effect of changes in gastrocnemius force at late stance when it peaks on the knee joint response and ACL force was initially investigated using a lower extremity musculoskeletal model driven by gait kinematics—kinetics. The tibiofemoral joint under isolated isometric contraction of gastrocnemius was subsequently analyzed at different force levels and flexion angles (0°–90°). Changes in gastrocnemius force at late stance markedly influenced hamstrings forces. Gastrocnemius acted as ACL antagonist by substantially increasing its force. Simulations under isolated contraction of gastrocnemius confirmed this role at all flexion angles, in particular, at extreme knee flexion angles (0° and 90°). Constraint on varus/valgus rotations substantially decreased this effect. Although hamstrings and gastrocnemius are both knee joint flexors, they play opposite roles in respectively protecting or loading ACL. Although the quadriceps is also recognized as antagonist of ACL, at larger joint flexion and in contrast to quadriceps, activity in gastrocnemius substantially increased ACL forces (anteromedial bundle). The fact that gastrocnemius is an antagonist of ACL should help in effective prevention and management of ACL injuries.     

Computational biodynamics of human knee joint in gait: from muscle forces to cartilage stresses

Using a validated finite element model of the intact knee joint we aim to compute muscle forces and joint response in the stance phase of gait. The model is driven by reported in vivo kinematics-kinetics data and ground reaction forces in asymptomatic subjects. Cartilage layers and menisci are simulated as depth-dependent tissues with collagen fibril networks. A simplified model with less refined mesh and isotropic depth-independent cartilage is also considered to investigate the effect of model accuracy on results. Muscle forces and joint detailed response are computed following an iterative procedure yielding results that satisfy kinematics/kinetics constraints while accounting at deformed configurations for muscle forces and passive properties. Predictions confirm that muscle forces and joint response alter substantially during the stance phase and that a simplified joint model may accurately be used to estimate muscle forces but not necessarily contact forces/areas, tissue stresses/strains, and ligament forces. Predictions are in general agreement with results of earlier studies. Performing the analyses at 6 periods from beginning to the end (0%, 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%), hamstrings forces peaked at 5%, quadriceps forces at 25% whereas gastrocnemius forces at 75%. ACL Force reached its maximum of 343 N at 25% and decreased thereafter. Contact forces reached maximum at 5%, 25% and 75% periods with the medial compartment carrying a major portion of load and experiencing larger relative movements and cartilage strains. Much smaller contact stresses were computed at the patellofemoral joint. This novel iterative kinematics-driven model is promising for the joint analysis in altered conditions.     

Partitioning of knee joint internal forces in gait is dictated by the knee adduction angle and not by the knee adduction moment

Medial knee osteoarthritis is a debilitating disease. Surgical and conservative interventions are performed to manage its progression via reduction of load on the medial compartment or equivalently its surrogate measure, the external adduction moment. However, some studies have questioned a correlation between the medial load and adduction moment. Using a musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity driven by kinematics–kinetics of asymptomatic subjects at gait midstance, we aim here to quantify the relative effects of changes in the knee adduction angle versus changes in the adduction moment on the joint response and medial/lateral load partitioning. The reference adduction rotation of 1.6° is altered by ±1.5° to 3.1° and 0.1° or the knee reference adduction moment of 17 N m is varied by ±50% to 25.5 N m and 8.5 N m. Quadriceps, hamstrings and tibiofemoral contact forces substantially increased as adduction angle dropped and diminished as it increased. The medial/lateral ratio of contact forces slightly altered by changes in the adduction moment but a larger adduction rotation hugely increased this ratio from 8.8 to a 90 while in contrast a smaller adduction rotation yielded a more uniform distribution. If the aim in an intervention is to diminish the medial contact force and medial/lateral load ratio, a drop of 1.5° in adduction angle is much more effective (causing respectively 12% and 80% decreases) than a reduction of 50% in the adduction moment (causing respectively 4% and 13% decreases). Substantial role of changes in adduction angle is due to the associated alterations in joint nonlinear passive resistance. These findings explain the poor correlation between knee adduction moment and tibiofemoral compartment loading during gait suggesting that the internal load partitioning is dictated by the joint adduction angle.     

A multiscale synthesis: characterizing acute cartilage failure under an aggregate tibiofemoral joint loading

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology - Knee articular cartilage is characterized by a complex mechanical behavior, posing a challenge to develop an efficient and precise model. We argue that...     

3D active-passive response of human knee joint in gait is markedly altered when simulated as a planar 2D joint

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology - Musculoskeletal models of the lower extremity make a number of important assumptions when attempting to estimate muscle forces and tibiofemoral...     

Knee joint passive stiffness and moment in sagittal and frontal planes markedly increase with compression

Knee joints are subject to large compression forces in daily activities. Due to artefact moments and instability under large compression loads, biomechanical studies impose additional constraints to circumvent the compression position–dependency in response. To quantify the effect of compression on passive knee moment resistance and stiffness, two validated finite element models of the tibiofemoral (TF) joint, one refined with depth-dependent fibril-reinforced cartilage and the other less refined with homogeneous isotropic cartilage, are used. The unconstrained TF joint response in sagittal and frontal planes is investigated at different flexion angles (0°, 15°, 30° and 45°) up to 1800 N compression preloads. The compression is applied at a novel joint mechanical balance point (MBP) identified as a point at which the compression does not cause any coupled rotations in sagittal and frontal planes. The MBP of the unconstrained joint is located at the lateral plateau in small compressions and shifts medially towards the inter-compartmental area at larger compression forces. The compression force substantially increases the joint moment-bearing capacities and instantaneous angular rigidities in both frontal and sagittal planes. The varus–valgus laxities diminish with compression preloads despite concomitant substantial reductions in collateral ligament forces. While the angular rigidity would enhance the joint stability, the augmented passive moment resistance under compression preloads plays a role in supporting external moments and should as such be considered in the knee joint musculoskeletal models.     

The effect of fibrillar degradation on the mechanics of articular cartilage: a computational model

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology - The pathogenesis and pathophysiological underpinnings of cartilage degradation are not well understood. Either mechanically or enzymatically mediated...     

Knee joint biomechanics in closed-kinetic-chain exercises

Effective management of knee joint disorders demands appropriate rehabilitation programs to restore function while strengthening muscles. Excessive stresses in cartilage/menisci and forces in ligaments should be avoided to not exacerbate joint condition after an injury or reconstruction. Using a validated 3D nonlinear finite element model, detailed biomechanics of the entire joint in closed-kinetic-chain squat exercises are investigated at different flexion angles, weights in hands, femur-tibia orientations and coactivity in hamstrings. Predictions are in agreement with results of earlier studies. Estimation of small forces in cruciate ligaments advocates the use of squat exercises at all joint angles and external loads. In contrast, large contact stresses, especially at the patellofemoral joint, that approach cartilage failure threshold in compression suggest avoiding squatting at greater flexion angles, joint moments and weights in hands. Current results are helpful in comprehensive evaluation and design of effective exercise therapies and trainings with minimal risk to various components.     

Steeper posterior tibial slope markedly increases ACL force in both active gait and passive knee joint under compression

The role of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) risk of injury has been supported by many imaging studies but refuted by some in vitro works. The current investigation was carried out to compute the effect of ±5^o change in PTS on knee joint biomechanics in general and ACL force/strain in particular. Two validated finite element (FE) models of the knee joint were employed; one active lower extremity musculoskeletal model including a complex FE model of the knee joint driven by in vivo kinematics/kinetics collected in gait of asymptomatic subjects, and the other its isolated unconstrained passive tibiofemoral (TF) joint considered under 1400 N compression at four different knee flexion angles (0°–45°). In the TF model, the compression force was applied at the joint mechanical balance point causing no rotations in sagittal and frontal planes.