The group size effect and synchronization of vigilance in the Tibetan wild ass

Vigilance behavior is considered as an effective strategy for prey species to detect predators.An individual benefits from living in a group by reducing the time spent being vigilant without affecting the probability of detecting a predator.However,the mechanism producing a decrease in vigilance with increasing group size is unclear.Many models of vigilance assume that group members scan independently of one another.Yet in recent studies,the other 2 patterns of vigilance,coordination and synchronization,were reported in some species.In 2 summers(2018 and 2019),we studied the group-size effect on vigilance and foraging of Tibetan wild ass in Chang Tang Nature Reserve of Tibet.We also tested whether individuals scan the environment independently,tend to coordinate their scans,or tend to synchronize their vigilance.The results showed that individuals decreased the time spent on vigilance with increasing group size,while increased the time spent foraging.Group members scanned the environment at the same time more frequently and there was a positive correlation between group members'behaviors,indicating that Tibetan wild asses tend to synchronize their vigilance.     

Pre-retirement predator encounters alter the morning behavior of captive marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi)

Limited data are available on the long-term effect an encounter with a predator has on its potential prey. Anecdotal reports from field research indicate that even unsuccessful attacks by predators on callitrichids have long-lasting effects. The subjects for this study were two groups of Geoffroy's marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi) housed outside, off exhibit, at the Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species at the San Diego Wild Animal Park. Before they retired in the evening, the marmosets were observed under one of three conditions: snake model, cloth control, and no-stimulus control. Data were collected the following morning for 1 hr after the animals emerged from the sleeping box. Compared to control conditions, exposure to the snake model before retirement the previous evening was associated with significantly more vigilance checks (i.e., inspecting the area where the stimulus was last seen), and a delay in beginning to forage on the ground. These results suggest that callitrichids use recent threatening experiences to guide their vigilance behavior 12 hr after the threat is detected, and that they adjust their early morning behavior in response to potential predatory threats.     

Difference in response by two cyprinid species to predatory threat from the nocturnal catfish Silurus asotus

Response to predators may not be identical between different prey species with different life histories and body sizes, particularly when the threat of predation is not great. To clarify this hypothesis, we introduced two prey species (10 Japanese dace, Tribolodon hakonensis, and 10 pale chub, Zacco platypus) into each experimental pond (in total, 8 ponds×4 trials) in which benthic algae had been allowed to grow. The presence or absence of Far Eastern catfish, Silurus asotus, and a refuge for prey fish was used to produce four treatments. The presence of catfish and/or a refuge did not affect either the feeding behavior or growth rate of Japanese dace. In contrast, when catfish were present and no refuge was available, the incidence of bottom feeding for pale chub greatly decreased. Pale chub growth rate was low when catfish were present and a refuge was available, indicating that pale chub spent more of their time in the refuge and lost opportunities of acquiring food. Japanese dace can reach a threshold size at which the prey are safe from predation, but pale chub cannot, and this may explain the differences in response to predators of the two species.     

Nepotistic vigilance behavior in Siberian jay parents

Many Siberian jay offspring (up to 50%) postpone independenceand stay with their parents for up to 3 years. Parents offersuch nondispersers a benefit in that they increase their vigilancewhile feeding together with retained offspring. In contrast,parents reduce their vigilance while in company of nonrelatedflock members according to the "many eyes" principle. The preferentialtreatment offered by the parents provides an incentive for offspringto forego dispersal. Given evidence for mortality via surpriseattacks by predators (goshawks), such nepotistic vigilance byparents could have a bearing on offspring survival and therebypromote delayed dispersal.     

Enhanced vigilance in monogamous pairs of the lizard, Tiliqua rugosa

The Australian sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa, forms monogamouspairs for up to 8 weeks each spring before mating. We observedthat males had food in their mouths significantly less oftenwhen they were in pain than when they were alone. Females hadfood in the mouth independent of the presence or absence ofmales. Among females that had been feeding, indicated by foodin the mouth, we observed them feeding, as we approached, lessoften when they were in pairs than when they were alone. Amongfemales in pairs with food in their mouths, we observed themfeeding less often when their male partners were not feedingthan when their partners were feeding. This suggests that femalesare alerted to approaching danger earlier when they are in apair, and alerted earlier in a pair when their male partneris not feeding. Enhanced vigilance may be one function of pairingbehavior.     

Male anti-predation services in primates as costly signalling? A comparative analysis and review

In species in which adults of the two sexes show long-term association, males often engage in acts of assistance (“services”) aimed at females and/or their young in various behavioural contexts that are not reciprocated. We conducted a quantitative review of the primate literature on sex differences in involvement in protection against predation. We found that males were more likely to be at the front of group progressions, especially in contexts of increased risk, were more vigilant, sometimes to the point of becoming sentinels, were more active in mobbing, and were far more likely to counter-attack felids and monkey-eating raptors than females did. Our evaluation showed that these services may be an expression of male parental care or aimed at bonded partners, but we also encountered many cases in which non-sires, unrelated to either females or immatures, provide them. We hence investigate explanations invoking group augmentation or costly signalling. Currently, available data on male anti-predation services in nonhuman primates do not allow us to distinguish among them, although costly signalling better explains data on birds and humans. We develop predictions that will allow more detailed tests of the various hypotheses for this understudied phenomenon.