Two Early Cretaceous Fossils Document Transitional Stages in Alvarezsaurian Dinosaur Evolution

1. Download high-res image (201KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Deep evolutionary diversification of semicircular canals in archosaurs

Download : Download video (66MB)     

Testing co-evolutionary hypotheses over geological timescales: interactions between Mesozoic non-avian dinosaurs and cycads

The significance of co‐evolution over ecological timescales is well established, yet it remains unclear to what extent co‐evolutionary processes contribute to driving large‐scale evolutionary and ecological changes over geological timescales. Some of the most intriguing and pervasive long‐term co‐evolutionary hypotheses relate to proposed interactions between herbivorous non‐avian dinosaurs and Mesozoic plants, including cycads. Dinosaurs have been proposed as key dispersers of cycad seeds during the Mesozoic, and temporal variation in cycad diversity and abundance has been linked to dinosaur faunal changes. Here we assess the evidence for proposed hypotheses of trophic and evolutionary interactions between these two groups using diversity analyses, a new database of Cretaceous dinosaur and plant co‐occurrence data, and a geographical information system (GIS) as a visualisation tool. Phylogenetic evidence suggests that the origins of several key biological properties of cycads (e.g. toxins, bright‐coloured seeds) likely predated the origin of dinosaurs. Direct evidence of dinosaur–cycad interactions is lacking, but evidence from extant ecosystems suggests that dinosaurs may plausibly have acted as seed dispersers for cycads, although it is likely that other vertebrate groups (e.g. birds, early mammals) also played a role. Although the Late Triassic radiations of dinosaurs and cycads appear to have been approximately contemporaneous, few significant changes in dinosaur faunas coincide with the late Early Cretaceous cycad decline. No significant spatiotemporal associations between particular dinosaur groups and cycads can be identified – GIS visualisation reveals disparities between the spatiotemporal distributions of some dinosaur groups (e.g. sauropodomorphs) and cycads that are inconsistent with co‐evolutionary hypotheses. The available data provide no unequivocal support for any of the proposed co‐evolutionary interactions between cycads and herbivorous dinosaurs – diffuse co‐evolutionary scenarios that are proposed to operate over geological timescales are plausible, but such hypotheses need to be firmly grounded on direct evidence of interaction and may be difficult to support given the patchiness of the fossil record.     

中国河南晚白垩世地层一枚可能属于重爪龙亚科(兽脚亚目:棘龙科)的牙齿化石(英文)

中国河南晚白垩世中段地层马家村组发现了一枚大型兽脚龙类牙齿。该牙牙体长,呈圆锥状,横断面卵圆形,沿长轴微向后缘弯曲,前后缘均有大量锯齿状突起,这些特征显示其很可能是重爪龙类牙齿。这可能代表了重爪龙类在亚洲地区的首次发现,也是该类恐龙在晚白垩世地层中的首现,由此表明重爪龙类在时间和地域分布上较之前研究观点更为广泛。综合棘龙科的化石形态学以及推知的生态学证据看,较之其他兽脚类,棘龙类化石记录很少,很可能意味该类动物数量确实稀少,造成这种现象的原因可能是其过分特化的身体形态。     

The theropod furcula

The furcula is a structure formed by the midline fusion of the clavicles. This is the element which is unique to theropods and is important for understanding the link between birds and other theropods. New specimens from basal theropods suggest that the furcula appeared very early in theropod history. We review furcula development, function, and morphology, as well as the anatomical terminology applied to it. Furcular morphology is highly variable in crown‐group avians but is rather conserved among nonavian theropods. Here we review, or describe for the first time, the furculae in many nonavian theropods. Furculae occur in nearly all major clades of theropods, as shown by new theropod specimens from the Early Cretaceous of China and a close inspection of previously collected specimens. Informative phylogenetic characters pertaining to the furcula occur throughout Theropoda, though care should betake to consider taphonomic effects when describing furcular morphology. J. Morphol., 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Feeding mechanisms of the sauropod dinosaurs Brachiosaurus,Camarasaurus, Diplodocus and Dicraeosaurus

Skull morphologies and dental wear patterns have been examined in four sauropod genera to evaluate their probable feeding mechanisms. Wear facets on teeth are generally confined to their apices in Brachiosaurus and Dicraeosaurus and they are sometimes also present on the mesial and distal carinae. Skull morphology and dental wear patterns in Diplodocus and Dicraeosaurus are consistent with a raking motion of the jaws during feeding. Diplodocus became mechanically adapted to feed in this way by evolving anteriorly directed teeth in the premaxilla and mesial parts of the maxilla, and by changing the direction of jaw adduction relative to the long axis of the skull. Similar features are present in the few known skulls of Apatosaurus and they may also have been present in Dicraeosaurus. In Brachiosaurus dental wear patterns also imply a raking motion of the jaws, although the more robust skull and teeth and the more vertically directed action of the jaw adductor muscles have led some to suggest the possibility of isognathous occlusion. Camarasaurus employed a powerful bite in its feeding, possibly with slight propaliny of the lower jaw, and its skull was modified to cope with increased stresses arising from mastication. Archaic sauropods appear largely to have employed isognathic occlusion in chopping off vegetation. The raking motion employed by diplodocids and dicraeosaurids was an advanced mode of cropping and stripping, linked evolutionarily to their highly apomorphic cranial morphology.     

四川盆地上三叠统最古老的兽脚类恐龙和似哺乳四足类动物足迹(英文)

四川盆地须家河组地层已发现了两处兽脚类恐龙足迹化石点,其大小分别与实雷龙足迹(Eubrontes)和跷脚龙足迹(Grallator)相仿。其中与实雷龙足迹大小相近的足迹包括了两个连续的后足迹,并构成行迹的一部分,已被命名为磁峰彭县足迹(Pengxianpus cifengensis)。与粗壮的实雷龙足迹相比,彭县足迹有着较细长的脚趾、保存尚清晰的趾垫、较宽的趾间角,这些特征都与晚三叠世–早侏罗世的卡岩塔足迹(Kayentapus)相似。目前尚不能证明彭县足迹和卡岩塔足迹属于同物异名,彭县足迹仍然被保留。两个足迹的部分区域都保存有皮肤纹理和多边形的鳞片印痕,其中最清晰的是第二个彭县足迹第四趾的跖趾垫处。与跷脚龙足迹大小相近的、较小的兽脚类恐龙足迹也组成不甚完整的行迹。它们表现出的较宽趾间角与卡岩塔足迹和彭县足迹相似,这里暂将其归入兽脚类足迹属种未定。彭县足迹的另一特别之处在于,岩板表面还有着小的前/后足迹,可归入似哺乳四足类动物足迹,其形态类似于北美和南非三叠系–侏罗系地层产出的同类足迹。这是亚洲东南部似哺乳类足迹的首次报道。     

Problems in discrimination of tridactyl dinosaur footprints,exemplified by the Hettangian trackways,the causses,France

Numerous tridactyl dinosaur footprints have been discovered in the Lower Jurassic (Hettangian) of the Causses, France. They exhibit the usual Grallator‐like morphology in which differences seem to be more a result of normal intraspecific variability than of inherent differences between skeletons. However, such subjective conclusions beg an analytical confirmation, which was the principal objective of this study.

For more reliable shape determinations, typical specimens from well‐preserved footprint ichnofaunas of the Connecticut Valley (USA) were used. Statistical methods are necessary to verify the homogeneity of such footprint populations. Determinations of the variability, confidence interval for the mean, and ratios between length characters are particularly important in reducing the influence of the size of each print. By this method, the ichnospecies Anomoepus intermedius, Eubrontes giganteus, and Grallator sillimani are statistically distinct; the equally distinct new ichnospecies from Saint‐Léons (Aveyron) can be designated as Grallator lescurei and the trackways of Saint‐Laurent as G. minusculus.

A problem remains in classifying the trackmaking dinosaurs. Their prior assignment to the theropods apparently should be revised because of the abundance of grallatorid footprints in the Lower Jurassic, which seems to contradict conclusions drawn from paleoecological data.     

An enigmatic early mesozoic dinosaur trackway from Zimbabwe

A trackway from Zimbabwe of probably the smallest dinosaur footprints recorded in Africa, is described and tentatively assigned to the Early Jurassic. The footprints are possibly those of a theropod and show strong negative (outward) rotation of the pes and are associated with manus prints. The shape of the footprints, unusual negative rotation, posterior curvature of digit IV and curious positioning of the manus prints in relation to the pes are enigmatic but somewhat reminiscent of Atreipus. Although a number of propositions are considered the most likely is that the animal was an immature dinosaur using a quadrupedal gait. A second trackway of slightly larger footprints of a bipedal theropod dinosaur is also recorded along with other diminutive tracks that suggest an early dinosaur assemblage, possibly dating from near the Trias‐sic‐Jurassic boundary.