Territorial behavior of Western Sandpipers on their nonbreeding grounds: effect of sex and foraging interference

ABSTRACT Nonbreeding shorebirds often alternate social structure between anonymous flocks and territorial behavior in response to different environmental factors. To evaluate specific drivers for one species, we studied the spacing behavior of wintering Western Sandpipers (Calidris mauri) at Bahía Santa María, northwestern Mexico, using behavioral observations. The density, population structure, and territorial behavior of Western Sandpipers differed among three habitat types. Cattail marshes supported 110 birds per ha, 49% males, and no territorial birds. Mangrove flats supported 288 birds per ha, 58% males, and 5% territorial birds. Brackish flats supported 365 birds per ha, 76% males, and 7% territorial birds. Territories consisted of rectangular strips (5–9 m long, N= 77). Territory length was not related to either bird density or number of territorial birds by plot, but was positively related to nearest bird distance. Aggression rate was inversely related to territory length, suggesting that territory length is set by the costs of defense. Foraging rate was independent of territory length, and prey densities in territories did not differ from those in areas used by nonterritorial birds. Males were more likely to be territorial and had a higher aggression rate than females, suggesting that males, which forage more on surface prey, were more affected by foraging interference. Our results suggest that the territorial behavior of Western Sandpipers in our study was an opportunistic strategy to reduce foraging interference. The variation in spacing behavior we documented provides evidence that interference competition affects the social structure of Western Sandpipers during the nonbreeding season.     

The specific use of nesting territory by the lesser sandhill crane in Yakutia

The left Indigirka riverside in Yakutia is the western periphery of the habitat of the lesser sandhill crane. The size of its population, time budget, and use of territory during the nesting season were studied in the period from 1998 to 2007. The density of population of this species is much lower here than in the northwest of Chukotka and in Alaska, which is reflected in the specific behavior of broods. For a decade, the size of its population increased more than 20 times.     

Depth-related differences in territory size and defense in the herbivorous cichlid,neolamprologus moorii, in lake tanganyika

Neolamprologus moorii, a small herbivorous cichlid of Lake Tanganyika, defends its territory against food competitors. Territory size and territorial defense were compared between two sites at different depths. In the shallow site, more fishes intruded into the territories than in the deep site, owing to the higher density fish population in the former. The territory holders in the shallow site attacked intruders more often, although the ratio of attacks to number of intruders was similar to that of the deep site. The territories in the deep site were larger and contained a greater amount of algae than the shallow site. The larger territory size in the deep site may have resulted from the lower cost of territory defense due to the lower competitor density and from the need to maintain a greater amount of food resources to compensate for lower algal productivity.     

Behavioral ecology of disturbed landscapes: the response of territorial animals to relocation

Intraspecific territorial interactions are common for a largevariety of wildlife species. This often results in high-qualityhabitat being occupied by dominant individuals, with subordinatesrelegated to lower quality habitat. The role that these territorialinteractions play in influencing the redistribution of animalsthat have been evicted from their native home ranges remainsunclear. My goals were to determine (1) how the density of conspecificsin the new habitats impacts resettlement patterns and (2) towhat extent prior dominance status is maintained when an animalis forced to relocate. I relocated white-footed mice (Peromyscusleucopus) from high-quality, oak-dominated hardwood and lowerquality, white pine forests to novel sites and released themalong the ecotone of these two habitat types. I relocated micefirst in the presence and then in the absence of a natural densityof resident mice. Habitat selection and resource acquisitionof relocated mice were assessed via mark-recapture livetrappingand passive integrated transponder tagging. Relocated mice selectedhigh-quality habitat significantly more often when residentmice were absent, illustrating the importance of territorialinteractions for determining resettlement patterns of relocatedindividuals. Data on resource acquisition also reflected thecompetitive influence of resident mice—relocated micewere significantly more successful accessing food resourcesin the treatment without residents. The habitat of origin didnot significantly impact habitat selection or resource acquisition,indicating that all relocated individuals were at a disadvantagecompared to residents.     

Context-dependent social benefits drive cooperative predator defense in a bird

1. Download : Download high-res image (159KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Cheetah behaviour at scent-marking sites indicates differential use by sex and social rank

Scent-marking is an important form of communication for solitary species, as the information remains for the receiver after the sender has left the area. Individuals of different demographic or dominance classes (ranks) need to provide different information to conspecifics. Therefore, the use of scent-marking sites is of particular value for solitary species, but their functional role may vary between demographic classes. Using camera traps, we video-recorded the behaviour of cheetahs at scent-marking sites, assessing how individuals of different sex and social rank use the sites for different roles. We tested hypotheses that these sites are for territorial marking, reproductive signalling and information gathering. We found that females visit the sites infrequently, apparently to signal oestrous events, while males visit the sites frequently for territorial marking and information gathering. Among males, dominant individuals scent-marked the most and reacted to female visitation by vocalizing. In contrast, subordinate males, although also visiting the sites, were not recorded scent-marking nor vocalizing. These differences in the functional use of scent-marking sites among sex and social rank support the hypotheses that cheetah s use these scent-marking sites for both territorial and reproductive signalling, as well as to gather information.