Management of Mild-to-Moderate Hypertriglyceridemia

ObjectiveHypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is highly prevalent globally, and its prevalence is rising, with a worldwide increase in the incidence of obesity and diabetes. This review examines its current management and future therapies.MethodsFor this review, HTG is defined as mild-to-moderate elevation in the levels of triglyceride (TG): a fasting or nonfasting TG level of ≥150 mg/dL and <500 mg/dL. We reviewed scientific studies published over the last 30 years and current professional society recommendations regarding the evaluation and treatment of HTG.ResultsGenetics, lifestyle, and other environmental factors impact TG levels. In adults with mild-to-moderate HTG, clinicians should routinely assess and treat secondary treatable causes (diet, physical activity, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and reduction or cessation of medications that elevate TG levels). Because atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk is the primary clinical concern, statins are usually the first-line treatment. Patients with TG levels between ≥150 mg/dL and <500 mg/dL whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is treated adequately with statins (at “maximally tolerated“ doses, per some statements) and have either prior cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus along with at least 2 additional cardiovascular disease risk factors should be considered for added icosapent ethyl treatment to further reduce their cardiovascular disease risk. Fibrates, niacin, and other approved agents or agents under development are also reviewed in detail.ConclusionThe treatment paradigm for mild-to-moderate HTG is changing on the basis of data from recent clinical trials. Recent trials suggest that the addition of icosapent ethyl to background statin therapy may further reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in patients with moderate HTG, although a particular TG goal has not been identified.     

COUNTERPOINT: Artificial Sweeteners for Obesity—Better than Sugary Alternatives; Potentially a Solution

ObjectiveNonnutritive (NNSs) are used in place of sugars to reduce caloric and glycemic intake while providing desired sweetness, commonly replacing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) with “diet” (zero-calorie) alternatives. Concern has developed due to observational data associating NNSs with obesity and adiposity-based chronic disease. This counterpoint argues that, in general, NNSs used in place of added or excess sugars in the diet are likely beneficial.MethodsA literature review was conducted on interventional trials investigating NNSs and obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Key words used in the search included artificial sweeteners, nonnutritive sweeteners, saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, stevia/steviol, acesulfame potassium, meal replacements, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and weight.ResultsInterventional data and indirect interventional data consistently showed beneficial effects on weight and cardiometabolic health, including glycemia, when SSBs or other energy-dense foods were replaced by artificially sweetened beverages or artificially sweetened meal replacements.ConclusionAlthough NNSs correlate with obesity and adiposity-based chronic disease, those data are fraught with confounding and error. Plausibility has been suggested on the basis of preclinical research on neuroendocrine control of appetite, satiety, and cravings plus the gut microbiome. However, interventional data reveal that replacing caloric/glycemic energy intake via NNSs creates an energy deficit resulting in weight loss and improvement in disease—especially dysglycemic disease. Intensive dietary intervention using artificially sweetened meal replacements shows a marked clinical benefit without detriment from their NNSs. Furthermore, beverages sweetened with NNSs rather than SSBs have been noted to be a critical component for those succeeding in maintaining weight loss. Although individual responses to the effects of NNSs are always warranted just like in any clinical situation, patients should not be advised to avoid NNSs in the context of dietary intervention to improve quality and energy deficit.