Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats

The cross-edge spillover of subsidized predators from anthropogenic to natural habitats is an important process affecting wildlife, especially bird, populations in fragmented landscapes. However, the importance of the spillover of insect natural enemies from agricultural to natural habitats is unknown, despite the abundance of studies examining movement in the opposite direction. Here, we synthesize studies from various ecological sub-disciplines to suggest that spillover of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies may be an important process affecting prey populations in natural habitat fragments. This contention is based on (1) the ubiquity of agricultural-natural edges in human dominated landscapes; (2) the substantial literature illustrating that crop and natural habitats share important insect predators; and (3) the clear importance of the landscape matrix, specifically distance to ecological edges, in influencing predator impacts in agroecosystems. Further support emerges from theory on the importance of cross-boundary subsidies for within site consumer-resource dynamics. In particular, high productivity and temporally variable resource abundance in agricultural systems are predicted to result in strong spillover effects. More empirical work examining the prevalence and significance of such natural enemy spillover will be critical to a broader understanding of fragmentation impacts on insect predator-prey interactions.     

Importance of terrestrial subsidies for native brook trout in Appalachian intermittent streams

相似文献   

Warming,eutrophication, and predator loss amplify subsidies between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems

The exchange of organisms and energy among ecosystems has major impacts on food web structure and dynamics, yet little is known about how climate warming combines with other pervasive anthropogenic perturbations to affect such exchanges. We used an outdoor freshwater mesocosm experiment to investigate the interactive effects of warming, eutrophication, and changes in top predators on the flux of biomass between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We demonstrated that predatory fish decoupled aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems by reducing the emergence of aquatic organisms and suppressing the decomposition of terrestrial plant detritus. In contrast, warming and nutrients enhanced cross‐ecosystem exchanges by increasing emergence and decomposition, and these effects were strongest in the absence of predators. Furthermore, we found that warming advanced while predators delayed the phenology of insect emergence. Our results demonstrate that anthropogenic perturbations may extend well beyond ecosystem boundaries by influencing cross‐ecosystem subsidies. We find that these changes are sufficient to substantially impact recipient communities and potentially alter the carbon balance between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere.     

Stable isotope evidence for Turkey Vulture reliance on food subsidies from the sea

Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) reliance on marine subsidies in coastal Baja California peninsula was quantitatively assessed by analyzing carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in its feathers. Feathers were collected in two separate roosts in a small farm, a small fishing village and an uninhabited beach. We compared among them the isotopic niches of the four populations and also with those of Yellow-footed Seagull (Larus livens), Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) and Orange-throated Whiptail lizard (Aspidoscelis hyperythra), used as reference for sympatric marine and terrestrial species. The importance of nutrients of marine origin varied among local close subpopulations, suggesting some spatial segregation. Dominant individuals would be established near predictable sources of food (human settlements), having a mixed terrestrial–marine diet influenced by local human activities (isotopic signature of feathers also indicated the role of human-fed cattle as vulture food). Subordinate individuals would be relegated to wandering along the beaches searching for washed up food, having a diet almost exclusively marine.     

Shellfish subsidies along the Pacific coast of North America

Spatial subsidies are associated with pronounced ecosystem responses, as nutrients cross ecological boundaries and cascade through food webs. While the importance of subsidies is known, the role of shellfish, specifically molluscs, as a marine subsidy has not been formally described. Focusing primarily on the Pacific coast of North America, we identify vectors that transport shellfish-derived nutrients into coastal terrestrial environments, including birds, mammals, and over 13 000 yr of marine resource use by people. Evidence from recipient ecosystems suggests shellfish drastically influence soil chemistry, forest productivity and the diversity of primary producers at the regional and landscape level. Responses in higher trophic levels have not yet been investigated, but given documented responses in lower trophic levels, this may be due to a lack of examination. To determine if the processes we describe within the northeast Pacific are pertinent to coastal environments worldwide, we also explore shellfish subsidies globally, with a specific focus on temperate and tropical islands. As shellfish are not as spatially or temporally constrained as other subsidies, our examination suggests our findings are applicable to many other geographical regions along the marine–terrestrial interface.     

Evaluating the consequences of salmon nutrients for riparian organisms: Linking condition metrics to stable isotopes

Stable isotope ratios (δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N) have been used extensively to trace nutrients from Pacific salmon, but salmon transfer more than carbon and nitrogen to stream ecosystems, such as phosphorus, minerals, proteins, and lipids. To examine the importance of these nutrients, metrics other than isotopes need to be considered, particularly when so few studies have made direct links between these nutrients and how they affect riparian organisms. Our study specifically examined δ¹³C and δ¹⁵N of riparian organisms from salmon and non‐salmon streams in Idaho, USA, at different distances from the streams, and examined whether the quality of riparian plants and the body condition of invertebrates varied with access to these nutrients. Overall, quality and condition metrics did not mirror stable isotope patterns. Most notably, all riparian organisms exhibited elevated δ¹⁵N in salmon streams, but also with proximity to both stream types suggesting that both salmon and landscape factors may affect δ¹⁵N. The amount of nitrogen incorporated from Pacific salmon was low for all organisms (<20%) and did not correlate with measures of quality or condition, probably due to elevated δ¹⁵N at salmon streams reflecting historical salmon runs instead of current contributions. Salmon runs in these Idaho streams have been declining, and associated riparian ecosystems have probably seen about a 90% reduction in salmon‐derived nitrogen since the 1950s. In addition, our results support those of other studies that have cautioned that inferences from natural abundance isotope data, particularly in conjunction with mixing models for salmon‐derived nutrient percentage estimates, may be confounded by biogeochemical transformations of nitrogen, physiological processes, and even historical legacies of nitrogen sources. Critically, studies should move beyond simply describing isotopic patterns to focusing on the consequences of salmon‐derived nutrients by quantifying the condition and fitness of organisms putatively using those resources.     

Contribution of terrestrial invertebrates to the annual resource budget for salmonids in forest and grassland reaches of a headwater stream

1. The annual input, contribution to the diet of salmonids, and quantitative input of terrestrial invertebrates to four reaches with contrasting forest (n=2) and grassland riparian vegetation (n=2) were compared in a Japanese headwater stream.
2. The annual input of terrestrial invertebrates falling into the forest reaches (mean±1 SE=8.7×10³±0.3×10³ mg m^?2 year^?1) was 1.7 times greater than that in the grassland reaches (5.1×10³±0.8×10³ mg m^?2 year^?1), with clear seasonality in the daily input of invertebrates in both vegetation types. The daily input, however, differed between the vegetation types only in summer, when it rose to a maximum in both vegetation types.
3. Fish biomass also differed among the seasons in both vegetation types, being less in the grassland reaches. The contribution of terrestrial invertebrates to the salmonid diet in the forest and grassland reaches was 11 and 7% in spring, 68 and 77% in summer, 48 and 33% in autumn, and 1 and 1% in winter, respectively. The prey consumption rate of fish, which was similar between the vegetation types, increased with stream temperature and was highest in summer. Terrestrial invertebrates supported 49% (mean±1 SE=5.3×10³±0.4×10³ mg m^?2 year^?1) of the annual, total prey consumption (10.9×10³±1.7×10³ mg m^?2 year^?1) by salmonids in the forest and 53% (2.0×10³±0.3×10³ mg m^?2 year^?1) (3.8×10³±0.6×10³ mg m^?2 year^?1) in the grassland reaches.
4. Salmonids were estimated to consume 51 and 35% of the annual total (falling plus drift) input of terrestrial invertebrates in the forest and grassland reaches, respectively. The input of terrestrial invertebrates by drift, however, was almost equal to the output in both vegetation types, suggesting that the reach‐based, in‐stream retention of terrestrial invertebrates almost balanced these falling in.
5. Difference in the riparian vegetation, which caused spatial heterogeneity in the input of terrestrial invertebrates, could play an important role in determining the local distribution of salmonids.     

Spiders and subsidies: results from the riparian zone of a coastal temperate rainforest

1. Aquatic insects emerging from streams can provide an important energy subsidy to recipient consumers such as riparian web-building spiders. This subsidy has been hypothesized to be of little importance where the primary productivity of the recipient habitat exceeds that of the donor habitat. 2. To test this hypothesis, we manipulated emerging stream insect abundance in a productive riparian rainforest in a replicated design using greenhouse-type exclosures, contrasted with unmanipulated stream reaches (four exclosures on two streams). 3. Experimental exclosures resulted in a 62.9% decrease in aquatic insect abundance in exclusion reaches compared with control reaches. The overall density of riparian spiders was significantly positively correlated with aquatic insect abundances. Horizontal orb weavers (Tetragnathidae) showed a strong response to aquatic insect reduction - abundance at exclosure sites was 57% lower than at control sites. Several spider families that have not been associated with tracking aquatic insect subsidies also showed significantly decreased abundance when aquatic insects were reduced. 4. This result is contrary to predictions of weak subsidy effects where recipient net primary productivity is high. These results suggest that predicting the importance of resource subsidies for food webs requires a focus on the relative abundance of subsidy materials in recipient and donor habitats and not simply on the total flux of energy between systems.     

Small reductions in forest cover weaken terrestrial-aquatic linkages in headwater streams

1. We assessed the impacts of deforestation on the energy base of headwater food webs in seven headwater streams in the Upper Chattahoochee basin, GA, U.S.A where percentage forest in catchments ranged from 82 to 96%. We measured terrestrial organic matter standing crop and determined consumer (crayfish and insectivorous fish) dependence on terrestrial versus aquatic energy sources via gut content and stable isotope analyses. 2. Standing crop of coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) declined with deforestation at large scales (i.e. catchment deforestation and riparian deforestation at the entire stream network scale). Terrestrial plant matter, the dominant component of crayfish guts, declined in crayfish guts with reductions in CPOM standing crop and with deforestation. 3. Crayfish and insectivorous fish δ¹³C showed enrichment trends with deforestation, indicating isotopic divergence from CPOM, the most ¹³C‐depleted basal resource, with reductions in catchment and riparian forest cover. Crayfish δ¹³C also exhibited enrichment with decreased instream CPOM standing crop. 4. A concentration‐dependent mixing model was used to calculate the relative dependence of crayfish and fish on terrestrial versus aquatic basal resources. Results suggested that both allochthonous CPOM and autochthonous production were important basal resources. Consumer dependence on CPOM decreased with reductions in canopy cover. 5. Our data suggest the importance of forest cover to headwater food webs at multiple scales, and that relatively low levels of riparian deforestation along headwater streams can lead to reductions in stream food web dependence on terrestrial subsidies.