Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl-polyaminate chitosan and its adsorption behavior toward a reactive dye

Carboxymethyl-polyaminate chitosan (DETA-CMCHS), a novel kind of amphoteric chitosan derivative, was prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, and by IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The adsorption behavior of Reactive Blue (RB2) on DETA-CMCHS was also studied. Results showed that the maximum value of adsorption capacity was 1185.71 mg/g at pH 3. The adsorption kinetic behavior was fitted with a second-order reaction rate equation. The adsorption was an exothermic, irreversible and entropy-reduced process according to thermodynamic parameters, such as standard Gibbs free-energy change, enthalpy change, and entropy change, all of which were calculated from adsorption equilibrium data.     

Synthesis and Cu(II) coordination of two new hexaamines containing alternated propylenic and ethylenic chains: Kinetic studies on pH-driven metal ion slippage movements

The synthesis of the open-chain and cyclic polyamines, 1,5,8,12,15,19-hexaazaheptadecane (L1) and 2,6,9,13,16,20-hexaaza[21]-(2,6)-pyridinophane (L2), are described. The protonation constants and interaction constants with Cu(II) have been determined by potentiometric measurements carried out at 298.1 K in 0.15 mol dm⁻³ NaClO₄. The values obtained are discussed as a function of the open-chain or cyclic nature of the ligands and compared with analogous polyamines containing different sets of hydrocarbon chains between the nitrogen donors. Kinetic studies on the acid-promoted dissociation of the Cu(II) complexes indicate that the mono and binuclear complexes of L1 decompose with different kinetics, a behavior unprecedented for open-chain polyamines. In contrast, the dissociation of the first metal ion is accelerated in the binuclear complexes of L2 and so, all the mono and binuclear complexes of L2 decompose with the same kinetics. The voltammetric response of Cu(II)-L1 and Cu(II)-L2 complexes has been studied in order to correlate electrochemical and structural data.     

单头亚菊的组织培养与快速繁殖

以单头亚菊茎段为外植体对其进行组织培养,MS为基本培养基,设置不同激素浓度配比。对实验结果进行观察分析,筛选出合适的配方。启动培养基为Ms＋0．5mg·L-16-BA＋0．01mg·L-1NAA。继代培养基MS＋O．75mg·L-1。6-BA＋0．01mg·L。NAA,可获得较高的增殖率。不定根最适诱导培养基为1／2MS＋O．15mg·L—IBA,生根率达87％以上,组培苗移栽成活率达98％。     

The chlorophenoxy herbicide dicamba and its commercial formulation banvel induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells

The sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency, the cell-cycle progression analysis, and the single cell gel electrophoresis technique (SCGE, comet assay) were employed as genetic end-points to investigate the geno- and citotoxicity exerted by dicamba and one of its commercial formulation banvel^® (dicamba 57.71%) on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Log-phase cells were treated with 1.0–500.0 μg/ml of the herbicides and harvested 24 h later for SCE and cell-cycle progression analyses. All concentrations assessed of both test compounds induced higher SCE frequencies over control values. SCEs increased in a non-dose-dependent manner neither for the pure compound (r = 0.48; P > 0.05) nor for the commercial formulation (r = 0.58, P > 0.05). For the 200.0 μg/ml and 500.0 μg/ml dicamba doses and the 500.0 μg/ml banvel^® dose, a significant delay in the cell-cycle progression was found. A regression test showed that the proliferation rate index decreased as a function of either the concentration of dicamba (r = −0.98, P < 0.05) or banvel^® (r = −0.88, P < 0.01) titrated into cultures in the 1.0–500.0 μg/ml dose-range. SCGE performed on CHO cells after a 90 min pulse-treatment of dicamba and banvel^® within a 50.0–500.0 μg/ml dose-range revealed a clear increase in dicamba-induced DNA damage as an enhancement of the proportion of slightly damaged and damaged cells for all concentrations used (P < 0.01); concomitantly, a decrease of undamaged cells was found over control values (P < 0.01). In banvel^®-treated cells, a similar overall result was registered. Dicamba induced a significant increase both in comet length and width over control values (P < 0.01) regardless of its concentration whereas banvel^® induced the same effect only within 100.0–500.0 μg/ml dose range (P < 0.01). As detected by three highly sensitive bioassays, the present results clearly showed the capability of dicamba and banvel^® to induce DNA and cellular damage on CHO cells.