Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): genetic correlations between flower size and number

The evolution of floral display is thought to be constrained by trade‐offs between the size and number of flowers and inflorescences. We grew in the glasshouse 60 maternal families from each of two Brazilian populations of the annual herb, Eichhornia paniculata. We measured flower size, daily flower number, and total flower number per inflorescence, and two indices of module size, leaf area and age at flowering. We also assessed the size and number of inflorescences produced over 6 weeks. All floral traits exhibited significant heritable variation, some of which was due to genetic variation in module size. Genetic (maternal family) correlations between daily and total flower number did not differ from 1.0, indicating that display size (daily flower number) cannot evolve independently from total flower number per inflorescence. Genetic correlations between flower size and daily flower number ranged from negative to positive (r=–0.78 to +0.84), depending on population and inflorescence. Positive correlations occurred when variation in investment per inflorescence was high so that some families produced both larger and more flowers. These correlations became zero when we controlled for variation in module size. Families that flowered later produced fewer, larger inflorescences (r=–0.33, –0.85). These data support theoretical predictions regarding the combined effects of variation in resource acquisition and allocation on traits involved in trade‐offs, and they emphasize the hierarchical organization of floral displays. Our results imply that patterns of resource allocation among inflorescences influence evolutionary changes in flower size and number per inflorescence.     

Endogenous Expression of Adenosine A<Subscript>1</Subscript>, A<Subscript>2 </Subscript>and A<Subscript>3</Subscript> Receptors in Rat C6 Glioma Cells

Inhibitory and stimulatory adenosine receptors have been identified and characterized in both membranes and intact rat C6 glioma cells. In membranes, saturation experiment performed with [³H]DPCPX, selective A₁R antagonist, revealed a single binding site with a K _D = 9.4 ± 1.4 nM and B _max = 62.7 ± 8.6 fmol/mg protein. Binding of [³H]DPCPX in intact cell revealed a K _D = 17.7 ± 1.3 nM and B _max = 567.1 ± 26.5 fmol/mg protein. On the other hand, [³H]ZM241385 binding experiments revealed a single binding site population of receptors with K _D = 16.5 ± 1.3 nM and B _max = 358.9 ± 52.4 fmol/mg protein in intact cells, and K _D = 4.7 ± 0.6 nM and B _max = 74.3 ± 7.9 fmol/mg protein in plasma membranes, suggesting the presence of A_2A receptor in C6 cells. A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ adenosine receptors were detected by Western-blotting and immunocytochemistry, and their mRNAs quantified by real time PCR assays. Giα and Gsα proteins were also detected by Western-blotting and RT-PCR assays. Furthermore, selective A₁R agonists inhibited forskolin- and GTP-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity and CGS 21680 and NECA stimulated this enzymatic activity in C6 cells. These results suggest that C6 glioma cells endogenously express A₁ and A₂ receptors functionally coupled to adenylyl cyclase inhibition and stimulation, respectively, and suggest these cells as a model to study the role of adenosine receptors in tumoral cells.