Prospects for incorporation of epigenetic biomarkers in human health and environmental risk assessment of chemicals

Epigenetic mechanisms have gained relevance in human health and environmental studies, due to their pivotal role in disease, gene × environment interactions and adaptation to environmental change and/or contamination. Epigenetic mechanisms are highly responsive to external stimuli and a wide range of chemicals has been shown to determine specific epigenetic patterns in several organisms. Furthermore, the mitotic/meiotic inheritance of such epigenetic marks as well as the resulting changes in gene expression and cell/organismal phenotypes has now been demonstrated. Therefore, epigenetic signatures are interesting candidates for linking environmental exposures to disease as well as informing on past exposures to stressors. Accordingly, epigenetic biomarkers could be useful tools in both prospective and retrospective risk assessment but epigenetic endpoints are currently not yet incorporated into risk assessments. Achieving a better understanding on this apparent impasse, as well as identifying routes to promote the application of epigenetic biomarkers within environmental risk assessment frameworks are the objectives of this review. We first compile evidence from human health studies supporting the use of epigenetic exposure‐associated changes as reliable biomarkers of exposure. Then, specifically focusing on environmental science, we examine the potential and challenges of developing epigenetic biomarkers for environmental fields, and discuss useful organisms and appropriate sequencing techniques to foster their development in this context. Finally, we discuss the practical incorporation of epigenetic biomarkers in the environmental risk assessment of chemicals, highlighting critical data gaps and making key recommendations for future research within a regulatory context.     

mRNA表观修饰方式及m6A功能研究进展

mRNA上能发生100多种化学修饰,其中N~6-腺嘌呤(m~6A)是mRNA修饰中最广泛的表观修饰方式之一。在细胞分化、胚胎发育和应激等生物学过程中,特定的mRNA会发生包括N~1-腺嘌呤甲基化、N~5-胞嘧啶甲基化、假尿嘧啶以及N`6-腺嘌呤甲基化等修饰,它们共同形成了mRNA转录后调控的表观修饰转录组,实现对mRNA翻译成蛋白质过程的精确时空调控,特别是m~6A修饰能通过调控mRNA的代谢和翻译等进而调控细胞的一系列生物学过程。文中主要综述mRNA的表观修饰类型和特点,特别是m~6A修饰参与调控mRNA和细胞生物学功能的最新研究进展,并展望了将来m~6A表观修饰的研究重点和方向。     

阿尔茨海默症的诊断与治疗研究进展

阿尔茨海默症(AD)即老年痴呆症,是以老年斑和神经元纤维缠结为主要病理特征的神经退行性疾病.AD的发病机制是多种发病素、多种通路和分子机制的相互参与,例如信号异常、炎症和免疫系统、脂质转运、细胞内吞作用、细胞凋亡、氧化损伤和应激反应、tau 病理学、神经元和突触的损失、能量代谢等.目前没有一种 AD 治疗方法能从根本上停止其病理的退行性改变,但仍有多种治疗策略.我们从生物标志物、遗传、神经影像、药物治疗、β淀粉样蛋白免疫治疗方面,对阿尔茨海默症的治疗研究进展进行了简要综述.     

人组织激肽释放酶4在激素依赖性肿瘤中的研究进展

人组织激肽释放酶基因家族由KLK1-KLK15构成,编码一组丝氨酸蛋白酶。研究发现KLK基因家族涉及癌细胞的多种生物学功能,且其表达受类固醇激素的调节。人组织激肽释放酶4是丝氨酸蛋白酶家族的一个成员,在多种激素依赖性肿瘤如卵巢癌、前列腺癌、乳腺癌、子宫内膜癌中高表达,且表达量受雌激素、孕激素、雄激素不同程度的调节。近年来很多文献报道人组织激肽释放酶4涉及癌细胞的增殖、上皮间质转化及细胞外基质的降解等过程,可能促进了肿瘤的发生、发展,且与激素依赖性肿瘤的预后不良有关。这些研究显示人组织激肽释放酶4与激素依赖性肿瘤关系密切,是其潜在的肿瘤标记物和治疗靶点,随着研究的进一步深入,有望应用于激素依赖性肿瘤的早期诊断、病程监测和治疗。     

Blood diagnostic biomarkers for major depressive disorder using multiplex DNA methylation profiles: discovery and validation

Aberrant DNA methylation in the blood of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) has been reported in several previous studies. However, no comprehensive studies using medication-free subjects with MDD have been conducted. Furthermore, the majority of these previous studies has been limited to the analysis of the CpG sites in CpG islands (CGIs) in the gene promoter regions. The main aim of the present study is to identify DNA methylation markers that distinguish patients with MDD from non-psychiatric controls. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of peripheral leukocytes was conducted in two set of samples, a discovery set (20 medication-free patients with MDD and 19 controls) and a replication set (12 medication-free patients with MDD and 12 controls), using Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips. Significant diagnostic differences in DNA methylation were observed at 363 CpG sites in the discovery set. All of these loci demonstrated lower DNA methylation in patients with MDD than in the controls, and most of them (85.7%) were located in the CGIs in the gene promoter regions. We were able to distinguish patients with MDD from the control subjects with high accuracy in the discriminant analysis using the top DNA methylation markers. We also validated these selected DNA methylation markers in the replication set. Our results indicate that multiplex DNA methylation markers may be useful for distinguishing patients with MDD from non-psychiatric controls.     

Absolute quantification of DcR3 and GDF15 from human serum by LC‐ESI MS

Biomarkers are widely used in clinical diagnosis, prognosis and therapy monitoring. Here, we developed a protocol for the efficient and selective enrichment of small and low concentrated biomarkers from human serum, involving a 95% effective depletion of high‐abundant serum proteins by partial denaturation and enrichment of low‐abundant biomarkers by size exclusion chromatography. The recovery of low‐abundance biomarkers was above 97%. Using this protocol, we quantified the tumour markers DcR3 and growth/differentiation factor (GDF)15 from 100 μl human serum by isotope dilution mass spectrometry, using ¹⁵N metabolically labelled and concatamerized fingerprint peptides for the both proteins. Analysis of three different fingerprint peptides for each protein by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry resulted in comparable concentrations in three healthy human serum samples (DcR3: 27.23 ± 2.49 fmol/ml; GDF15: 98.11 ± 0.49 fmol/ml). In contrast, serum levels were significantly elevated in tumour patients for DcR3 (116.94 ± 57.37 fmol/ml) and GDF15 (164.44 ± 79.31 fmol/ml). Obtained data were in good agreement with ELISA and qPCR measurements, as well as with literature data. In summary, our protocol allows the reliable quantification of biomarkers, shows a higher resolution at low biomarker concentrations than antibody‐based strategies, and offers the possibility of multiplexing. Our proof‐of‐principle studies in patient sera encourage the future analysis of the prognostic value of DcR3 and GDF15 for colon cancer patients in larger patient cohorts.     

GENETIC VARIATION AND THE EVOLUTION OF EPIGENETIC REGULATION

Epigenetic variation has been observed in a range of organisms, leading to questions of the adaptive significance of this variation. In this study, we present a model to explore the ecological and genetic conditions that select for epigenetic regulation. We find that the rate of temporal environmental change is a key factor controlling the features of this evolution. When the environment fluctuates rapidly between states with different phenotypic optima, epigenetic regulation may evolve but we expect to observe low transgenerational inheritance of epigenetic states, whereas when this fluctuation occurs over longer time scales, regulation may evolve to generate epigenetic states that are inherited faithfully for many generations. In all cases, the underlying genetic variation at the epigenetically regulated locus is a crucial factor determining the range of conditions that allow for evolution of epigenetic mechanisms.     

PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY AND EPIGENETIC MARKING: AN ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE FOR GENETIC ACCOMMODATION

The relationship between genotype (which is inherited) and phenotype (the target of selection) is mediated by environmental inputs on gene expression, trait development, and phenotypic integration. Phenotypic plasticity or epigenetic modification might influence evolution in two general ways: (1) by stimulating evolutionary responses to environmental change via population persistence or by revealing cryptic genetic variation to selection, and (2) through the process of genetic accommodation, whereby natural selection acts to improve the form, regulation, and phenotypic integration of novel phenotypic variants. We provide an overview of models and mechanisms for how such evolutionary influences may be manifested both for plasticity and epigenetic marking. We point to promising avenues of research, identifying systems that can best be used to address the role of plasticity in evolution, as well as the need to apply our expanding knowledge of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms to our understanding of how genetic accommodation occurs in nature. Our review of a wide variety of studies finds widespread evidence for evolution by genetic accommodation.