Alteration of oligomeric state and domain architecture is essential for functional transformation between transferase and hydrolase with the same scaffold

Transferases and hydrolases catalyze different chemical reactions and express different dynamic responses upon ligand binding. To insulate the ligand molecule from the surrounding water, transferases bury it inside the protein by closing the cleft, while hydrolases undergo a small conformational change and leave the ligand molecule exposed to the solvent. Despite these distinct ligand‐binding modes, some transferases and hydrolases are homologous. To clarify how such different catalytic modes are possible with the same scaffold, we examined the solvent accessibility of ligand molecules for 15 SCOP superfamilies, each containing both transferase and hydrolase catalytic domains. In contrast to hydrolases, we found that nine superfamilies of transferases use two major strategies, oligomerization and domain fusion, to insulate the ligand molecules. The subunits and domains that were recruited by the transferases often act as a cover for the ligand molecule. The other strategies adopted by transferases to insulate the ligand molecule are the relocation of catalytic sites, the rearrangement of secondary structure elements, and the insertion of peripheral regions. These findings provide insights into how proteins have evolved and acquired distinct functions with a limited number of scaffolds.     

Cloning and characterization of the trout perforin

The pore-forming protein, perforin is one of the effectors of cell-mediated killing. A perforin cDNA clone was isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) after screening of a spleen cDNA library. The full-length cDNA is 2070 bp in size, encoding for a polypeptide of 589 amino acids. The predicted amino acid sequence of the trout perforin is 64, 58 and 40% identical to those of Japanese flounder, zebrafish and human perforins, respectively. Although its membrane attack complex/perforin (MACPF) domain is conserved, trout perforin shows low homology to human and trout terminal complement components (C6, C7, C8 and C9), ranging from 19 to 26% identity. Expression analysis reveals that the trout perforin gene is expressed in the blood, brain, heart, kidney, intestine and spleen. Phylogenetic analysis of proteins which belong to the MACPF superfamily clusters the trout perforin in the same group with other known perforins.     

Evolution of double MutT/Nudix domain-containing proteins: similar domain architectures from independent gene duplication-fusion events

The MutT/Nudix superfamily proteins repair DNA damage and play a role in human health and disease. In this study, we examined two different cases of double MutT/Nudix domain-containing proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Firstly, these double domain proteins were discovered in Drosophila, but only single Nudix domain proteins were found in other animals. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the protein sequence of Nudix_N and Nudix_C from Drosophila, and Nudix from other animals. The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the double Nudix domain proteins might have undergone a gene duplication-speciation-fusion process. Secondly, two genes of the MutT family, DR0004 and DR0329, were fused by two mutT gene segments and formed double MutT domain protein genes in Deinococcus radiodurans. The evolutionary tree of bacterial MutT proteins suggested that the double MutT domain proteins in D. radiodurans probably resulted from a gene duplication-fusion event after speciation. Gene duplication-fusion is a basic and important gene innovation mechanism for the evolution of double MutT/Nudix domain proteins. Independent gene duplication-fusion events resuited in similar domain architectures of different double MutT/Nudix domain proteins.     

ABC transporters influence sensitivity of Brugia malayi to moxidectin and have potential roles in drug resistance

Some ABC transporters play a significant role in human health and illness because they confer multidrug resistance (MDR) through their overexpression. Compounds that inhibit the drug efflux mechanism can improve efficacy or reverse resistance. Of the eight described ABC transporter subfamilies, those proteins conferring MDR in humans are in subfamilies A, B, C, and G. In nematodes, transporters in subfamilies B and C are suggested to confer resistance to ivermectin. The Brugia malayi ABC transporter superfamily was examined to assess their potential to influence sensitivity to moxidectin. There was an increase in expression of ABC transporters in subfamilies A, B, C, and G following treatment. Co-administration of moxidectin with inhibitors of ABC transporter function did not enhance sensitivity to moxidectin in males; however, sensitivity was significantly enhanced in females and microfilariae. The work suggests that ABC transporters influence sensitivity to moxidectin and have a potential role in drug resistance.     

Tolerance of β-diketone hydrolases as representatives of the crotonase superfamily towards organic solvents

Crotonase superfamily enzymes catalyze a wide variety of reactions, including hydrolytic C–C bond cleavage in symmetrical β‐diketones by 6‐oxo camphor hydrolase (OCH) from Rhodococcus sp. The organic solvent tolerance and temperature stability of OCH and its structurally related ortholog Anabaena β‐diketone hydrolase have been investigated. Both enzymes showed excellent tolerance toward organic solvents; for instance, even in the presence of 80% (v/v) THF or dioxane, OCH was still active. In most solvent mixtures, except methanol, the stereospecificity was conserved (>99% e.e. of product), hence neither the type of solvent nor its concentration appeared to have an effect on the stereoselectivity of the enzyme. Attempts to correlate the observed activities with log P, functional solvent group or denaturing capacity (DC) of the solvent were only successful in the case of DC for water miscible solvents. This study represents the first investigation of organic solvent stability for members of the crotonase superfamily. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108: 2815–2822. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Let's go bananas: revisiting the endocytic BAR code

Against the odds of membrane resistance, members of the BIN/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domain superfamily shape membranes and their activity is indispensable for a plethora of life functions. While crystal structures of different BAR dimers advanced our understanding of membrane shaping by scaffolding and hydrophobic insertion mechanisms considerably, especially life-imaging techniques and loss-of-function studies of clathrin-mediated endocytosis with its gradually increasing curvature show that the initial idea that solely BAR domain curvatures determine their functions is oversimplified. Diagonal placing, lateral lipid-binding modes, additional lipid-binding modules, tilde shapes and formation of macromolecular lattices with different modes of organisation and arrangement increase versatility. A picture emerges, in which BAR domain proteins create macromolecular platforms, that recruit and connect different binding partners and ensure the connection and coordination of the different events during the endocytic process, such as membrane invagination, coat formation, actin nucleation, vesicle size control, fission, detachment and uncoating, in time and space, and may thereby offer mechanistic explanations for how coordination, directionality and effectiveness of a complex process with several steps and key players can be achieved.