增生性玻璃体视网膜病变动物模型的改进和评价

增生性玻璃体视网膜病变是导致视网膜脱离手术失败的主要原因,建立动物模型能更好的研究其发病机理,从而进行防治。本文就PVR动物模型的所用动物、模型的建立方法以及评价和分级进行综述。     

不同造影方法显示弹性酶诱导的兔囊状动脉瘤

目的评估经股动脉穿刺超选造影、静脉造影、心脏穿刺造影和左侧耳中央动脉穿刺造影方法显示弹性酶诱导的兔囊状动脉瘤的可行性。方法取10只新西兰兔,采用弹性酶诱导方法制作兔右侧颈总动脉起始部囊状动脉瘤模型。术后3周对所有动物分别进行经股动脉穿刺超选造影、静脉造影、心脏穿刺造影和左侧耳中央动脉穿刺造影,根据造影结果测量动脉瘤短径、长径和瘤颈宽。采用重复测量设计的方差分析方法比较不同造影方法显示的动脉瘤相关参数测量结果差异。结果采用经股动脉穿刺超选造影、静脉造影、心脏穿刺造影和左侧耳中央动脉穿刺造影方法均能较清楚的显示的动脉瘤,比较不同造影方法测量的动脉瘤短径、长径和瘤颈宽均无统计学差异（P值分别是0.646,0.427和0.625）。结论不同的造影方法均能较准确显示弹性酶诱导的兔囊状动脉瘤大小,根据不同的实验目的和条件可选用不同的造影方法。     

实验动物饲养和运输的伦理与福利

本文提出实验动物福利是人类应当给予实验动物的良好条件（正面因素）,主要体现在动物的饲养和运输等过程,以“5F”为基本理论;伦理则是人类给予动物实验处理（负面因素）时应遵循的原则,主要体现在动物实验过程中,以“3R”为基本理论.同时总结了实验动物饲养和运输过程的实际经验,从环境、笼具、垫料、密度、饲料和饮水、社会和行为需要、安乐死、运输等方面,介绍了保障实验动物福利的具体做法.     

抗乙型肝炎病毒药物评价用实验动物模型现状

乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染严重影响人类的健康,感染HBV的慢性患者可引起肝硬化、肝细胞癌及肝功丧失等病症.开发有效的抗HBV药物,对于其感染的治疗非常关健.HBV具有非常窄的宿主范围,因此选择合适的药物评价用动物模型至关重要,常用的模型动物有鸭、土拔鼠、黑猩猩及近年研究的转基因小鼠等.     

非人灵长类局部脑缺血动物模型研究现状

非人灵长类动物在种系发生上较啮齿类更接近于人类,用来制备局部脑缺血模型可以更好的拟合临床症状和机理。通过对国内外非人灵长类动物局部脑缺血模型的制备方法和应用现状进行收集、分类和述评,展望非人灵长类动物模型的应用前景,尤其是利用低等灵长类动物树鼩研究缺血性中风的优势。     

糖尿病肾病动物模型的研究进展

糖尿病肾病是糖尿病的主要并发症之一,也是终末期肾衰的元凶,其发病机制至今尚未阐明。因此,建立理想的实验动物模型是研究糖尿病肾病发病机制、疾病防治、新药开发的关键环节。本文回顾并分析了有关该疾病模型的国内外文献,从造模方法、发病机制、病理改变、适用条件、模型的优缺点等方面进行比较分析,为选择合适的动物模型应用于糖尿病肾病的研究提供参考。     

BDNF-restricted knockout mice as an animal model for aggression

Mice with global deletion of one brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) allele or with forebrain-restricted deletion of both alleles show elevated aggression, but this phenotype is accompanied by other behavioral changes, including increases in anxiety and deficits in cognition. Here we performed behavioral characterization of conditional BDNF knockout mice generated using a Cre recombinase driver line, KA1-Cre, which expresses Cre in few areas of brain: highly at hippocampal area CA3 and moderately in dentate gyrus, cerebellum and facial nerve nucleus. The mutant animals exhibited elevated conspecific aggression and social dominance, but did not show changes in anxiety-like behaviors assessed using the elevated plus maze and open field test. There were no changes in depression-like behaviors tested in the forced swim test, but small increase in immobility in the tail suspension test. In cognitive tasks, mutants showed normal social recognition and normal spatial and fear memory, but exhibited a deficit in object recognition. Thus, this knockout can serve as a robust model for BDNF-dependent aggression and object recognition deficiency.     

The value of juvenile animal studies: a pediatric clinical perspective

With the emphasis of US American and European legislators on consideration of children in the drug development process regulatory authorities ask increasingly for additional non-clinical data to elucidate the safety of a given drug in development in future pediatric use. Juvenile animal studies are increasingly requested. These requests should never be tick box requests. Companies, academic toxicologists, clinicians, and regulatory authorities need a dialogue to differentiate between the perceived need to do "something" and the request for studies that have clinically meaningful results.     

Juvenile animal studies and pediatric drug development: a European regulatory perspective

During the workshop organized by ILSI/HESI on May 5-6, 2010 on the value of juvenile animal toxicity studies, the implementation of the European Pediatric Regulation and in particular the review process of the nonclinical part of the Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) were described. A PIP is intended to outline the development of a medicinal product in the pediatric population (i.e. quality, safety, efficacy of the medicine and timing of studies); it is reviewed and agreed by the Pediatric Committee (PDCO) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The Nonclinical Working Group (NcWG) supports the PDCO in the review process of the nonclinical part of a PIP and is composed of members from the PDCO, the EMA Safety Working Party, additional experts from national competent authorities and the FDA. This article summarizes the NcWG review process and outcomes of 97 approved or ongoing PIPs, from the establishment of the NcWG in November 2008 to May 2010, as presented during the workshop. Juvenile animal studies were proposed by the applicant in 33% or required by the NcWG in 26% of the PIPs. The requirements were mainly motivated by concerns regarding potential developmental toxicities, in view of the young age of the pediatric population to be investigated, the lack of knowledge concerning the maturation of the pharmacological target, the lack of sufficient (non)clinical data, observed toxicities in the adult (non)clinical studies and the long duration of the intended treatments. Most juvenile animal studies were in the therapeutic areas of oncology, infectious diseases and endocrinology. In about 14% of the PIPs submitted, the NcWG requested either justifications of, or amendments to the study designs proposed by the applicants (e.g. justification of endpoints, study duration, species selection and timing with regards to clinical pediatric studies). Generally, only one species was selected or proposed for the juvenile studies, the rat being the most prevalent. The number of juvenile studies initially proposed by the applicant plus those requested by the NcWG was higher than the number of studies included in the "key binding elements" of the PIP opinions. This apparent discrepancy was mainly due to additional information or justifications submitted by the applicant during the clock stop. It was noted that the PIPs initially submitted often lacked information relevant to the nonclinical evaluation. Therefore, during the workshop, the need to provide scientifically based justifications when no juvenile animal studies are proposed in the initial PIP submission was stressed.     

Bacterial survival studies to assess the efficacy of static pile composting and above ground burial for disposal of bovine carcases

Aim: To assess the survival of bacteria during two alternative means of cattle carcase disposal in windrows: static pile composting (SPC) and above ground burial in soil (AGB), under temperate climate conditions on agricultural land, compared to surface disposal as the control method. Methods and Results: Bacteriological reference materials (pooled bovine faeces in permeable nylon bags and lyophilized cultures of Escherichia coli in glass ampoules) were positioned above and below each of 33 beef cattle carcases (250–300 kg). Temperatures at these sites were monitored with data loggers, while temperature and CO₂ probes were applied repeatedly at varying depths along the windrows. Aliquots of each reference material were cultured from three randomly selected animals from the SPC and AGB group and from all three control animals on five occasions (at 28, 56, 84, 126 and 182 days). SPC was highly efficacious in the destruction of coliforms in faeces and E. coli in ampoules within 28 days, while AGB was not significantly better than controls until 84 days, and bacteria in reference materials above the AGB carcases were still viable after 182 days. Temperature probes and loggers showed SPC provided sustained temperatures of 55–70°C, while AGB did not reach temperatures of 30°C, and the temperature differences correlated with bacteriological findings. Conclusions: In relation to emergency disease management, SPC can be successfully applied to eliminate pathogenic bacteria in cattle carcases, but AGB is unsuitable for carcase disposal. Significance and Impact of the Study: In emergency, animal disease outbreaks in temperate climates requiring large‐scale ruminant carcase disposal, SPC can be successfully applied for the destruction of micro‐organisms.