Conservation genetics of whales and dolphins

Whales and dolphins (cetaceans) are found in all the world's oceans and in some of the major rivers, yet little is known about the distribution and behaviour of many species. At the same time, cetaceans are under threat from a variety of pressures including direct and indirect takes, pollution, and competition for habitat and prey. To ensure their long-term survival it will be necessary to preserve genetic diversity through the identification and protection of differentiated populations, the assessment of variation within local populations, and through a better understanding of reproductive and dispersal behaviour. The application of molecular genetic techniques is helping to provide answers to some of these previously intractable questions. Early results suggest few consistent patterns. Obvious geographic boundaries correlate to genetic distance in some species, and not in others. Furthermore, morphological variation within species can be fairly extensive without correlating to genetic distance, or relatively minor between morphotypes that are as genetically distinct as some species. These examples emphasize the need for further study.     

CAPACITY AND MODE OF PCB METABOLISM IN SMALL CETACEANS1

Based on a comparative approach using PCB isomer and congener compositions in higher animals and their food organisms, the capacity and mode of PCB metabolism in small cetaceans were studied and the following conclusions were drawn: (1) Small cetaceans can metabolize some of the lower chlorinated biphenyls and this capacity seems to be the same in all species of these animals. (2) The values of MI, an index to evaluate the capacity of PCB metabolism, showed that the metabolic capacity of small cetaceans was extremely low as compared to those of birds and terrestrial mammals. (3) The structural requirements for PCB metabolism were different in animal species, in that small cetaceans have no capacity to metabolize a group of PCBs with adjacent non-chlorinated meta and para carbons in biphenyl rings. (4) No development of PB (phenobarbital)-type enzymes, and a lower activity of MC (3-methylcholanthrene)-type enzymes were suggested in small cetaceans, which implies long-term accumulation and possible reproductive toxicity of persistent organochlorines in these animals. The present approach should provide an important insight into the physiological responses of small cetaceans to persistent toxic chemicals.     

Microvascular characteristics of the acoustic fats: Novel data suggesting taxonomic differences between deep and shallow‐diving odontocetes

Odontocetes have specialized mandibular fats, the extramandibular (EMFB) and intramandibular fat bodies (IMFB), which function as acoustic organs, receiving and channeling sound to the ear during hearing and echolocation. Recent strandings of beaked whales suggest that these fat bodies are susceptible to nitrogen (N₂) gas embolism and empirical evidence has shown that the N₂ solubility of these fat bodies is higher than that of blubber. Since N₂ gas will diffuse from blood into tissue at any blood/tissue interface and potentially form gas bubbles upon decompression, it is imperative to understand the extent of microvascularity in these specialized acoustic fats so that risk of embolism formation when diving can be estimated. Microvascular density was determined in the EMFB, IMFB, and blubber from 11 species representing three odontocete families. In all cases, the acoustic tissues had less (typically 1/3 to 1/2) microvasculature than did blubber, suggesting that capillary density in the acoustic tissues may be more constrained than in the blubber. However, even within these constraints there were clear phylogenetic differences. Ziphiid (Mesoplodon and Ziphius, 0.9 ± 0.4% and 0.7 ± 0.3% for EMFB and IMFB, respectively) and Kogiid families (1.2 ± 0.2% and 1.0 ± 0.01% for EMFB and IMFB, respectively) had significantly lower mean microvascular densities in the acoustic fats compared to the Delphinid species (Tursiops, Grampus, Stenella, and Globicephala, 1.3 ± 0.3% and 1.3 ± 0.3% for EMFB and IMFB, respectively). Overall, deep‐diving beaked whales had less microvascularity in both mandibular fats and blubber compared to the shallow‐diving Delphinids, which might suggest that there are differences in the N₂ dynamics associated with diving regime, phylogeny, and tissue type. These novel data should be incorporated into diving physiology models to further understand potential functional disruption of the acoustic tissues due to changes in normal diving behavior.     

LASER SAFETY THRESHOLDS FOR CETACEANS AND PINNIPEDS

An increase in the use of oceanographic lidar has raised concern over laser safety for marine mammals. We were able to address some of these concerns by combining information about current laser safety standards, retinal damage mechanisms for humans, and research on eye anatomy for humans, cetaceans, and pinnipeds. To estimate the irradiance at the retina, the image size at the retina and pupil diameter must be known. We estimate the smallest spot size using retinal resolution or visual acuity for six species of cetaceans and five species of pinnipeds. A sensitivity ratio was calculated for each species using the ratio of the irradiance at the retina of the marine mammal to the irradiance at the retina of humans. The sensitivity ratio was used to suggest exposure limits for the various species. Because the human eye is more sensitive than either the cetacean or pinniped eye, we conclude that laser energies that are eye-safe for humans will also be safe for marine mammals, and higher laser irradiances may be permissible if illumination of humans is avoided.