Plant killing by Neotropical acacia ants: ecology,decision‐making,and head morphology

Mutualistic species often associate with several partners that vary in the benefits provided. In some protective ant–plant mutualisms, ants vary in the extent at which they kill neighboring vegetation. Particularly, in acacia ants (Pseudomyrmex), the area around the host tree that ants keep free from vegetation (“clearings”) vary depending on the species. This study assessed whether interspecific variation in clearing size corresponds to workers biting on plant tissue of different thickness. As expected, workers from species making the largest clearings bit more often on thicker plant tissues than workers from species making smaller clearings. Because head shape affects mandible force, I also assessed whether pruning on thick tissue in mutualistic ant species or being a predator in non‐mutualistic species correlated with broader heads, which yield stronger mandible force. The species with the broader heads were non‐mutualistic predators or mutualistic pruners of thick tissues, which suggest that pruning neighboring vegetation in non‐predatory species demands force even when the ants do not kill prey with their mandibles. The findings reveal that clearing size variation in mutualistic ant partners of plants can also be observed at the level of individual decision‐making processes among workers, and suggest that head morphology could be a trait under selection in protective ant–plant mutualisms. Abstract in Spanish is available with online material.     

Choice of food resource by bees and ants (Hymenoptera: Apoidea,Formicidae) on coconut tree inflorescences (Cocos nucifera,Arecaceae)

Coconut trees are mostly anemophilous; however, because bees and ants forage on coconut tree inflorescences for floral food, entomophilous pollination can also occur. The aim of this study was to determine the food resource preference of bees and ants while they collect pollen, nectar and, for ants, occasionally prey on coconut tree inflorescences, as well as to evaluate their impact on self-pollination. The number of ant visits to first female and then male flowers is significantly higher than that of bees. For Apis mellifera (L.) and Pseudomyrmex gracilis (Fabricius) 14% of the sequences were favorable to direct self-pollination. The probability of visits for all of the sequences was similar for both bees and ants and there was no difference in resource choice. For these reasons, neither can be considered a more effective pollinator of the coconut tree.     

Ant body posture: gaster curling increases ant speed

1. Body postures adopted by an animal can serve behavioural functions, homeostasis, or energy balance. 2. We investigated the function of holding the gaster curled forward under the thorax in acacia ants, Pseudomyrmex spinicola Emery, by testing whether ants adopted this posture for defence, thermoregulation, or for efficient locomotion. 3. For the defence hypothesis, we expected an increase in the proportion of ants with curled gasters after a visual threat, a vibrational disturbance of a branch, or the release of nestmate's alarm pheromones. Our data did not support these predictions. 4. For the thermoregulation hypothesis, we found a positive correlation between temperature and proportion of curled‐gaster ants. However, we did not find a reduction in the proportion of curled‐gaster ants after shading them, as predicted by this hypothesis. 5. Our data supported the locomotion hypothesis: curled‐gaster ants walked 1 cm s^?1 faster than ants with the gaster held straight. Straight‐gaster ants walked with the thorax closer to the surface, a posture that likely shifts the centre of gravity closer to the surface in a manner similar to gaster curling. 6. Studying the role of the body posture in acacia ants and other insects will provide a better understanding of the kinematics of walking in challenging angles with respect to gravity.     

Run,robber, run: parasitic acacia ants use speed and evasion to steal food from ant‐defended trees

Ants that are obligate plant associates protect their host against herbivores and aggressively defend the resources offered by the plant. Workers of Pseudomyrmex nigropilosus Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an acacia ant that parasitizes the mutualism by not defending the tree, are seen stealing food from other ant‐defended acacia trees. In the present study, hypotheses of evasion, chemical crypsis, chemical repellence and temporal activity patterns are tested in the field aiming to determine how P. nigropilosus enters other acacia trees, successfully circumventing the defence of the resident ants. When parasitic ants are stealing, resident ants are evaded by stopping walking, changing their walking direction or walking faster. Resident and parasitic workers have similar temporal activity patterns. Parasitic workers can walk 2.6‐fold faster compared with any of the three species of acacia‐ants from which they usually steal food. Behavioural assays suggest that P. nigropilosus do not have chemical repellence but that chemical crypsis may be involved in the evasion strategy. This last hypothesis needs to be explored further by chemical and olfactory analyses. The combination of speed and evasive reactions allows parasitic ants to access well‐defended acacia trees.