Development of the axial skeleton in wolffish, Anarhichas lupus (Pisces, Anarhichadidae), at different temperatures

The ontogeny of the axial skeleton, in particular the caudal skeleton, is described from embryos to adult specimens in common wolffish, Anarhichas lupus. The eggs were incubated at constant temperatures of 7.0, 11.0 and 13.0 °C. High egg mortality and structural changes in skeletal development (fusion of parts, absence of distal radials and most of dorsal and anal fin rays, abnormal neural arches and dorsal fin rays) were observed at 13 °C. The frequencies of some anomalies were lower at 11 °C than at 13 °C. The main reason of structural changes of the skeleton at high temperature is the breaking of normal correlations between developmental rates of some cartilaginous structures and other tissues and organs of the embryo. These data suggest an epigenetic mechanism of skeletal evolution.     

Strepsirhine dichotomy from a human perspective (Primates: Lorisoidea, Lemuroidea)

Using monospecific, polyclonal antisera against 69 human plasma proteins, 128 antigenic determinants from 40 cross-reacting homologues were characterized in representatives of the prosimian genera Lemur, Eulemur, Varecia (Lemuridae) and Otolemur (Galagidae). Seventeen determinants from 16 different proteins were absent in homologues of the gagalo but were shared by lemurs and several platyrrhines, cercopithecids, and hominoids. Smaller locus samples for potto(Perodicticus potto) and slow loris (Nycticebus coucang) confirmed the more distant immunological relationship of lorises than of lemurs to anthropoids. If evolutionary rates are constant and equal in lorisiform and lemuriform prosimians, this patern of character distribution indicates strepsirhine paraphyly, lorises diverging earlier (possibly some 6 times 10⁶ years) than lemurs from anthropoid ancestors. If this is so, lorises rather than true lemurs should be elected to root the polarity of character evolution in Primates. As an alternative, galagine proteins evolve more rapidly than lemurine homologues.     

Early development of the head skeleton in Brycon moorei(Pisces, Ostariophysi, Characidae)

At hatching (15 h post fertilization), Brycon moorei possesses no skeletal structure. Thereafter, development is very rapid. The first oral teeth appear no later than 3 h post‐hatching, but they remain covered with epithelium until c . 45 h. At 7 h, the trabecular bars and part of the cartilaginous visceral arches are visible and at 15 h, the dentaries and premaxillaries are present. At 25 h, i.e . the onset of piscivory and cannibalism (the yolk sac is only fully resorbed after 36 h), the oral teeth are fully developed, the first pharyngeal teeth are formed, and some head movements already appear synchronized, but the mouth cavity is not completely isolated from the neurocranium by bony structures. Thereafter, no new buccal or pharyngeal bony structure is visible until 45 h, when the maxilla and opercula appear, along with a new type of cannibalistic behaviour. Cartilage resorptions also start at 45 h, but with no concomitant replacement by formation of calcified structures. Later, development gradually becomes similar to that of many previously studied teleosts. The developmental pattern of B. moorei is thus extremely rapid in comparison with other teleosts, i.e . it prioritizes feeding structures that permit the expression of piscivory at a very early age. The uniqueness of this pattern is discussed in relation to ecological constraints on early feeding and fast growth.     

Synchrotron analysis of a ‘mummified’ salamander (Vertebrata: Caudata) from the Eocene of Quercy,France

An incomplete ‘mummy’ from the Phosphorites du Quercy (presumed Eocene) was identified as a salamander during the 19^th century. The specimen has now been computed tomography (CT) scanned, and this revealed the incomplete skeleton (with perfectly preserved bones) and soft tissues (lung). The fossil represents a new, well‐characterized taxon. Despite the absence of the skull, several features allow a phylogenetic analysis. The fossil belongs to pseudosaurian caudates; it is tentatively assigned to the Salamandridae, although affinities with Plethodontidae cannot be definitely ruled out.     

Partially repeatable genetic basis of benthic adaptation in threespine sticklebacks

The extent to which convergent adaptation to similar ecological niches occurs by a predictable genetic basis remains a fundamental question in biology. Threespine stickleback fish have undergone an adaptive radiation in which ancestral oceanic populations repeatedly colonized and adapted to freshwater habitats. In multiple lakes in British Columbia, two different freshwater ecotypes have evolved: a deep‐bodied benthic form adapted to forage near the lake substrate, and a narrow‐bodied limnetic form adapted to forage in open water. Here, we use genome‐wide linkage mapping in marine × benthic F2 genetic crosses to test the extent of shared genomic regions underlying benthic adaptation in three benthic populations. We identify at least 100 Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) harboring genes influencing skeletal morphology. The majority of QTL (57%) are unique to one cross. However, four genomic regions affecting eight craniofacial and armor phenotypes are found in all three benthic populations. We find that QTL are clustered in the genome and overlapping QTL regions are enriched for genomic signatures of natural selection. These findings suggest that benthic adaptation has occurred via both parallel and nonparallel genetic changes.     

Coos,booms, and hoots: The evolution of closed‐mouth vocal behavior in birds

Most birds vocalize with an open beak, but vocalization with a closed beak into an inflating cavity occurs in territorial or courtship displays in disparate species throughout birds. Closed‐mouth vocalizations generate resonance conditions that favor low‐frequency sounds. By contrast, open‐mouth vocalizations cover a wider frequency range. Here we describe closed‐mouth vocalizations of birds from functional and morphological perspectives and assess the distribution of closed‐mouth vocalizations in birds and related outgroups. Ancestral‐state optimizations of body size and vocal behavior indicate that closed‐mouth vocalizations are unlikely to be ancestral in birds and have evolved independently at least 16 times within Aves, predominantly in large‐bodied lineages. Closed‐mouth vocalizations are rare in the small‐bodied passerines. In light of these results and body size trends in nonavian dinosaurs, we suggest that the capacity for closed‐mouth vocalization was present in at least some extinct nonavian dinosaurs. As in birds, this behavior may have been limited to sexually selected vocal displays, and hence would have co‐occurred with open‐mouthed vocalizations.     

Interspecific allometry of the mandible,dental arch,and molar area in anthropoid primates: Functional morphology of masticatory components

Allometric equations relating the lengths and widths of the mandible and dental arch, and of molar area, were obtained in a wide range of anthropoid primates grouped into four subsets, pongids, cercopithecids, nonmarmoset platyrrhines, and marmosets. Mandibular width is negatively allometric against length across anthropoids but cercopithecids had relatively wider mandibles than nonmarmosets of the same size class. Mandibular length relative to dental arch length was isometric within and between the four groups but dental arch width scaled negatively against all the other dimensions examined in this study, indicating a functional dissociation between the dental arcade and the bony mandible. Molar area showed various scaling patterns relative to mandibular length (isometry) and width (positive). There were no parameters that scaled positively against body weight across groups, except for molar area in cercopithecids (strongly) and nonmarmoset (moderately). Notable functional specializations include relatively long dental arches in cercopithecoids, related to large, elongate bilophodont molars, and the tendency to increase relative jaw length across the range of anthropoid sizes, reflecting negative allometry of the brain (cranial bicondylar width). We caution that various allometry and functional patterns may be masked by generalizing from broad taxonomic comparison involving a large sweep of adaptative patterns.     

Intracytoplasmic filaments in pulmonary lymphatic endothelial cells

Summary The cytochemistry and ultrastructure of intracytoplasmic filaments of pulmonary lymphatic endothelial cells of neonatal rabbits were studied by comparison with myofilaments of the peribronchial and pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cells. Two types of endothelial filaments were observed: thin filaments (diameter: 50 Å) which lie close to the abluminal cell membrane; and thick filaments (diameter: 90 Å) which are dispersed throughout the cell cytoplasm.Following heavy meromyosin (HMM) treatment, characteristic arrowhead complexes formed in the thin lymphatic endothelial filaments as well as in the actin filaments of the smooth muscle cells. There was no detectable reaction of HMM with the thick filaments.After incubation with EDTA, the thin filaments were labile, and the thick filaments became the major filamentous component in the endothelial cells. In smooth muscle cells, the actin myofilaments were also labile while the 100 Å filaments were stable.These observations support the hypothesis that the actin-like thin endothelial lymphatic filaments form part of a contractile system, while the thick filaments constitute a plastic cell skeleton. The significance of the contractile system in lymphatic endothelial cells might lie in a mechanism for the active regulation of the endothelial intercellular junctions and gaps and hence the permeability of the lymphatic endothelial cell lining.This study was supported by The Council for Tobacco Research—U.S.A. The authors thank Professor Robert C. Rosan, M.D. (Saint-Louis University—U.S.A.) for expert advice. R. Renwart, B. Emanuel and R. Jullet for technical, G. Pison and St. Ons for photographical and N. Tyberghien for secretarial assistance.     

The form of the talus in some higher primates: a multivariate study

Sixteen measurements of the talus have been taken on 334 tali of a total of eleven primate groups and several additional single individual specimens. Multivariate morphometric (canonical and generalized distance) analyses of these data in extant higher primates are presented and used to define the relative morphological positions of fossils of the genera Proconsul and Limnopithecus, of individual specimens from Kromdraai, Olduvai and Kiik-Koba (Homo neanderthalensis), and a group of specimens of Bronze Age man from Jericho. Following preliminary studies the ultimate analysis suggests that the various extant arboreal primates examined fall within an envelope that is defined by Macaca together with various other Old World monkeys and extending in different directions to the extreme genera (a) Pongo, (b) Hylobates and (c) Ateles. This separation is thus one which defines generally quadrupedal monkeys and separates the various extreme arboreal locomotor modes of (a) acrobatic climbing and hanging, (b) richochetal brachiation and (c) prehensile-tailed arm-swinging and hanging, respectively. Man and the African apes are well separated both from each other and from this spectrum of arboreally adapted genera. Bronze Age man from Jericho and Neandertal man from Kiik-Koba lie relatively close to the position for modern man although significantly separated from him. Limnopithecus, Proconsul, and the specimens from Kromdraai and Olduvai all lie within the envelope of arboreal species and specifically rather close to, although significantly different from, the orang-utan; they differ markedly from both man and the African apes. The possibility exists that the resemblances of Proconsul and Limnopithecus relate to arboreal habitus in these species. The findings for the specimens from Kromdraai and Olduvai suggest either that the morphological resemblances to arboreal forms relate to a previous arboreal history for these species, or that bipedality is much less advanced or uniquely different from that displayed by Homo. It is not inconceivable that both conditions might apply.