Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Torpedo Electric Organ: Effect of Guanine Nucleotides

Abstract: The effect of guanine nucleotides on the binding properties of presynaptic muscarinic receptors has been studied in a membrane preparation from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata by measuring the competitive displacement of the radiolabelled antagonist, [³H]quinuclidinyl benzilate, by nonradioactive muscarinic ligands. The binding of the antagonists, atropine, scopolamine and pirenzepine was to a single class of sites [slope factors (pseudo Hill coefficients) close to 1] and was unaffected by 0.1 m M GTP. The binding of the N -methylated antagonists, N -methylatropine and N -methyl-scopolamine was more complex (slope factors <1) but also insensitive ( N- methylatropine) to 0.1 m M GTP. Agonist binding was complex and could be resolved into two binding sites with relatively high and low affinities. The proportion of high-affinity sites varied with the nature of the agonist (15–80%). Agonist binding was depressed by 0.1 m M GTP, and the order of sensitivity was oxotremorine-M > carbamoylcholine > muscarine > acetylcholine > arecoline > oxotremorine. The binding of pilocarpine, a partial agonist, was unaffected by GTP. With carbamoylcholine as a test ligand the GTP effect on agonist binding was half-maximal at 12 μM. GDP and guanylylimidodiphosphate produced comparable inhibition of carbamoylcholine binding, but GMP and cyclic GMP were ineffective, as were various adenine nucleotides. Analysis of agonist binding in terms of a two-site model indicates that the predominant effect of guanine nucleotides is to reduce the number of sites of higher affinity.     

Modulation of GABA Receptor Binding by Ca+2

In frozen-thawed repeatedly washed rat cortical synaptic membranes, Ca2+ (1-5 mM) decreased the binding of [3H]muscimol whereas it increased the binding of [3H]gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). However, the binding of [3H]GABA was decreased by the same extent as the binding of [3H]muscimol when the membranes were incubated with baclofen (a selective ligand for the GABAB binding site) and Ca2+. Scatchard analysis of [3H]muscimol binding revealed that Ca2+ reduced the density of GABA binding sites without affecting the dissociation constant. Ca2+ was more potent than Ba2+, Mg2+ was ineffective, and the Ca2+ antagonist La3+ stimulated [3H]muscimol binding. The inhibition of [3H]muscimol binding by Ca2+ was not influenced by calmodulin (50 micrograms/ml), trifluoperazine (10(-5) M), verapamil (10(-6) M), quinacrine (10(-4) M), cordycepin (0.1 mM), leupeptin (20 microM), or soybean trypsin inhibitor (0.1 mg/ml). Moreover, the effect of Ca2+ was additive to that of GABA-modulin. These results indicate that Ca2+ decreases the number of GABAA binding sites while unveiling GABAB binding sites.     

A vivid model of chiral recognition

Hands can be used to demonstrate the three-point model of chiral recognition. The points of attachment are thumb, forefinger, and middle finger. This vivid model has the advantages of simplicity, perspicuity, and availability at any time, although two persons are necessary. It can be shown that two interactions are not sufficient for chiral recognition but that three attractive or two attractive and one repulsive attraction are needed. It can also be used to explain some possibilities of weakening or elusion of the three-point model.     

Heparin-binding growth factors and their receptors

Heparin-binding growth factors modulate diverse biological activities including cellular proliferation, cellular differentiation, morphogenesis, and angiogenesis. Biochemical characterization for two members of the heparin-binding growth factor family, acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors, is extensive, while characterization of the remaining five members is forthcoming. Cell surface receptors have been identified for acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors, but little is known concerning their sites of action in vivo or the mechanisms involved in transducing the energy of growth factor binding to a biological response. An understanding of the biological basis for the diversity of the heparin binding growth factor family and the in vivo actions of these factors will prove a major challenge to future research efforts.     

Regulation of Histamine Turnover via Muscarinic and Nicotinic Receptors in the Brain

To clarify the regulation of central histaminergic (HAergic) activity by cholinergic receptors, the effects of drugs that stimulate the cholinergic system on brain histamine (HA) turnover were examined, in vivo, in mice and rats. The HA turnover was estimated from the accumulation of tele-methylhistamine (t-MH) during the 90-min period after administration of pargyline (65 mg/kg, i.p.). In the whole brain of mice, oxotremorine, at doses higher than 0.05 mg/kg, s.c., significantly inhibited the HA turnover, this effect being completely antagonized by atropine but not by methylatropine. A large dose of nicotine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) also significantly inhibited the HA turnover. This inhibitory effect was antagonized by mecamylamine but not by atropine or hexamethonium. A cholinesterase inhibitor, physostigmine, at doses higher than 0.1 mg/kg, s.c., significantly inhibited the HA turnover. This effect was antagonized by atropine but not at all by mecamylamine. None of these cholinergic antagonists used affected the steady-state t-MH level or HA turnover by themselves. In the rat brain, physostigmine (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) also decreased the HA turnover. This inhibitory effect of physostigmine was especially marked in the striatum and cerebral cortex where muscarinic receptors are present in high density. Oxotremorine (0.2 mg/kg, s.c.) and nicotine (1 mg/kg, s.c.) also decreased the HA turnover in the rat brain. However, these effects showed no marked regional differences. These results suggest that the stimulation of central muscarinic receptors potently inhibits the HAergic activity in the brain and that strong stimulation of central nicotinic receptors can also induce a similar effect.     

Histamine Stimulation of Cyclic AMP Accumulation in Astrocyte-Enriched and Neuronal Primary Cultures from Rat Brain

Histamine stimulates cyclic AMP accumulation in astrocyte-enriched and neuronal primary cultures from rat brain in the presence of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine. The response in the astrocyte cultures (Emax = 304 +/- 44% over basal, EC50 = 43 +/- 5 microM) was much higher than in neuronal cultures (Emax = 24 +/- 2%, EC50 = 14 +/- 7 microM). The histamine effect in astrocytes was competitively inhibited by the H2 antagonists cimetidine (Ki = 1.1 +/- 0.2 microM) and ranitidine (Ki = 46 +/- 10 nM) but was insensitive to the H1 antagonist mepyramine (1 microM). The two selective H2 agonists impromidine and dimaprit behaved as partial agonists and showed relative potencies (139 and 0.5, respectively) consistent with an interaction with H2 receptors. The more selective H1 agonist 2-thiazolylethylamine (0.01-1 mM) did not potentiate the response to impromidine (10 microM). Thus, in contrast to what is generally observed in intact cell preparations from brain, the histamine-induced cyclic AMP accumulation in astroglial cells is mediated solely by H2 receptors. The small effect shown in neuronal cultures also appears to be mediated by H2 receptors.     

Identification of Glucagon Receptors in Rat Retina

In this study, we characterize the glucagon receptors on rat retinal particulate preparations. The specific binding of 125I-glucagon was saturable and reversible. Apparent equilibrium conditions were established within 30-45 min. Analysis of binding data is compatible with the existence of two classes of binding sites: a high-affinity class with a KD of 7 +/- 0.8 nM and a Bmax of 2.3 +/- 0.2 pmol/mg of protein and a low-affinity class with a KD of 84.4 +/- 2.5 nM and a Bmax of 16.5 +/- 2.3 pmol/mg of protein. The 125I-glucagon binding to retinal particulate preparation was not inhibited by 1 microM concentrations of insulin, atrial natriuretic factor, angiotensin II, somatostatin, and vasoactive intestinal peptide. However, synthetic human pancreatic growth hormone-releasing factor, hGRF-44, inhibited binding, although the concentration required for half-maximal displacement was 10-fold higher than that for native glucagon. Glucagon binding was GTP sensitive. Inclusion of 0.1 mM GTP in the binding assay produced an increase in the concentration of unlabeled glucagon required for half-maximal displacement of 125I-glucagon, from 23 to 220 nM. Glucagon stimulated adenylate cyclase formation in retinal particulate preparations. The concentration of glucagon required for half-maximal activation of retinal adenylate cyclase was 16.2 nM. These results suggest that glucagon may play a role as a neurosignal transmitter in rat retina.     

Comparison of α1-Adrenergic Receptor-Stimulated Inositol Phosphate Formation in Primary Neuronal and Glial Cultures

alpha 1-Adrenergic receptor binding sites and norepinephrine-stimulated 3H-inositol phosphate (3H-InsP) accumulation were measured in primary cultures of neurons and glia from 1-day-old rat brains. The density of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor binding sites was approximately three times higher in membranes from neurons compared to glia. Although norepinephrine was slightly more potent in stimulating 3H-InsP formation in neurons than in glia, the maximal response was greater in glial cells. Norepinephrine-stimulated 3H-InsP formation remained constant for [3H]inositol prelabelling periods of 1-14 days in neurons, whereas the response increased with time in glia and was maximal after 7-10 days of prelabelling. Both the incorporation of [3H]inositol into lipid and basal levels of 3H-InsPs were lower in glial cells than in neurons, which accounted for the greater percent stimulation in glia. Pretreatment with phenoxybenzamine decreased norepinephrine-stimulated 3H-InsP formation in a dose-dependent manner in both neurons and glia by decreasing the maximal response without altering potency. HPLC separation showed that similar types of 3H-InsPs were accumulated in neurons and glial cells. These results demonstrate that alpha 1-adrenergic receptors exist on both neurons and glial cells and activate 3H-InsP accumulation in both cell types. Although receptor density is higher in neurons than in glia, the 3H-InsP response is higher in glia. This difference does not appear to be due to different receptor reserves, but may be due to differential coupling mechanisms in the two cell types.     

Both A1 and A2a Purine Receptors Regulate Striatal Acetylcholine Release

The receptors responsible for the adenosine-mediated control of acetylcholine release from immunoaffinity-purified rat striatal cholinergic nerve terminals have been characterized. The relative affinities of three analogues for the inhibitory receptor were (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine greater than cyclohexyladenosine greater than N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), with binding being dependent of the presence of Mg2+ and inhibited by 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate [Gpp(NH)p] and adenosine receptor antagonists. Adenosine A1 receptor agonists inhibited forskolin-stimulated cholinergic adenylate cyclase activity, with an IC50 of 0.5 nM for (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine and 500 nM for (S)-phenylisopropyladenosine. A1 agonists inhibited acetylcholine release at concentrations approximately 10% of those required to inhibit the cholinergic adenylate cyclase. High concentrations (1 microM) of adenosine A1 agonists were less effective in inhibiting both adenylate cyclase and acetylcholine release, due to the presence of a lower affinity stimulatory A2 receptor. Blockade of the A1 receptor with 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine revealed a half-maximal stimulation by NECA of the adenylate cyclase at 10 nM, and of acetylcholine release at approximately 100 nM. NECA-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity copurified with choline acetyltransferase in the preparation of the cholinergic nerve terminals, suggesting that the striatal A2 receptor is localized to cholinergic neurones. The possible role of feedback inhibitory and stimulatory receptors on cholinergic nerve terminals is discussed.