A Note on Interval Estimation of the Simple Difference in Data with Correlated Matched Pairs

When we employ cluster sampling to collect data with matched pairs, the assumption of independence between all matched pairs is not likely true. This paper notes that applying interval estimators, that do not account for the intraclass correlation between matched pairs, to estimate the simple difference between two proportions of response can be quite misleading, especially when both the number of matched pairs per cluster and the intraclass correlation between matched pairs within clusters are large. This paper develops two asymptotic interval estimators of the simple difference, that accommodate the data of cluster sampling with correlated matched pairs. This paper further applies Monte Carlo simulation to compare the finite sample performance of these estimators and demonstrates that the interval estimator, derived from a quadratic equation proposed here, can actually perform quite well in a variety of situations.     

Bayesian Construction of an Improved Parametric Test for Probability‐Based Individual Bioequivalence

Assuming a lognormally distributed measure of bioavailability, individual bioequivalence is defined as originally proposed by Anderson and Hauck (1990) and Wellek (1990; 1993). For the posterior probability of the associated statistical hypothesis with respect to a noninformative reference prior, a numerically efficient algorithm is constructed which serves as the building block of a procedure for computing exact rejection probabilities of the Bayesian test under arbitrary parameter constellations. By means of this tool, the Bayesian test can be shown to maintain the significance level without being over‐conservative and to yield gains in power of up to 30% as compared to the distribution‐free procedure which gained some popularity under the name TIER. Moreover, it is shown that the Bayesian construction also allows scaling of the probability‐based criterion with respect to the proportion of subjects exhibiting bioequivalent responses to repeated administrations of the reference formulation of the drug under study.     

Bayesian Inference for the Ratio of the Means of Two Normal Populations with Unequal Variances

The problem of making inferences about the ratio of two normal means has been addressed, both from the frequentist and Bayesian perspectives, by several authors. Most of this work is concerned with the homoscedastic case. In contrast, the situation where the variances are not equal has received little attention. Cox (1985) deals, within the frequentist framework, with a model where the variances are related to the means. His results are mainly based on Fieller's theorem whose drawbacks are well known. In this paper we present a Bayesian analysis of this model and discuss some related problems. An agronomical example is used throughout to illustrate the methods.     

Estimating Neospora caninum prevalence in wildlife populations using Bayesian inference

Prevalence of disease in wildlife populations, which is necessary for developing disease models and conducting epidemiologic analyses, is often understudied. Laboratory tests used to screen for diseases in wildlife populations often are validated only for domestic animals. Consequently, the use of these tests for wildlife populations may lead to inaccurate estimates of disease prevalence. We demonstrate the use of Bayesian latent class analysis (LCA) in determining the specificity and sensitivity of a competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA; VMRD^®, Inc.) serologic test used to identify exposure to Neospora caninum (hereafter N. caninum) in three wildlife populations in southeastern Ohio, USA. True prevalence of N. caninum exposure in these populations was estimated to range from 0.1% to 3.1% in American bison (Bison bison), 51.0% to 53.8% in Père David's deer (Elaphurus davidianus), and 40.0% to 45.9% in white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). The accuracy of the cELISA in American bison and Père David's deer was estimated to be close to the 96% sensitivity and 99% specificity reported by the manufacturer. Sensitivity in white‐tailed deer, however, ranged from 78.9% to 99.9%. Apparent prevalence of N. caninum from the test results is not equal to the true prevalence in white‐tailed deer and Père David's deer populations. Even when these species inhabit the same community, the true prevalence in the two deer populations differed from the true prevalence in the American bison population. Variances in prevalence for some species suggest differences in the epidemiology of N. caninum for these colocated populations. Bayesian LCA methods could be used as in this example to overcome some of the constraints on validating tests in wildlife species. The ability to accurately evaluate disease status and prevalence in a population improves our understanding of the epidemiology of multihost pathogen systems at the community level.