Nocturnal hatching timing of mouthbrooding male cardinalfish Apogon niger

We observed hatching behavior by mouthbrooding males of the cardinalfish, Apogon niger. Mouthbrooding males showed no feeding activities at night, in spite of their nocturnal feeding habit. On the day of hatching, they released newly hatched larvae from their mouths on average 81 min after sunset. Semilunar hatching periodicity was significant, but its diel pattern was independent of the tidal rhythm. Sunset hatching may be advantageous not only to offspring because of their low predation risk but also to parental males because they can resume feeding sooner, thereby reducing the energetic loss from fasting while mouthbrooding. Received: August 22, 2000 / Revised: November 28, 2000 / Accepted: January 12, 2001     

Filial Cannibalism in the Paternal Mouthbrooding Cardinalfish Apogon lineatus: Egg Production by the Female as the Nutrition Source for the Mouthbrooding Male

We investigated about filial cannibalism by Apogon lineatus based on 25 mouthbrooding males sampled in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Eggs were found in the stomachs of all mouthbrooding males, indicating that Apogon lineatus performs partial brood cannibalism. The number of eggs in the stomachs ranged from 1015 to 9384, corresponding to 30% on average of the entire brood. This study revealed that mouthbrooding males could gain considerable energy by partial brood cannibalism during brood periods, that is, females would produce surplus eggs as the nutrition sources for starving males.     

Filial cannibalism as a conditional strategy in males of a paternal mouthbrooding fish

Filial cannibalism is widespread in a variety of animal species and has been generally accepted as an adaptive behavior. Within a population, some individuals adopt filial cannibalism and others do not, in spite of its adaptiveness. There is little knowledge of how such a polymorphic trait is maintained in nature. To understand the underlying mechanism of cannibalistic polymorphism, we conducted a long-term field study that involved monitoring of the reproductive experience of marked individuals in the paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish, Apogon doederleini, in which parental males sometimes cannibalize their entire broods. We assumed that filial cannibalism can be described as one of three possible strategies: alternative, mixed or conditional. Individual cannibalistic tendencies, represented by the number of entire brood cannibalism performed by each individual in one breeding season, showed a random distribution within the study population. Moreover, the individual cannibalistic tendencies were not consistent between two successive seasons. These results suggest that filial cannibalism is phenotypically plastic, thus eliminating the alternative strategy as a possible mechanism. Comparison of variance in reproductive success between cannibals and non-cannibals showed that observations were not in accordance with those expected in the case that males adopt filial cannibalism stochastically, that is, as a mixed strategy. Our previous studies have indicated that filial cannibalism is affected by male status, such as age, somatic condition and mate availability. In conclusion, filial cannibalism by male A. doederleini is carried out as a conditional strategy.     

Functional morphology of the luminescence system of Siphamia versicolor (Perciformes: Apogonidae), a bacterially luminous coral reef fish

Previous studies of the luminescence system of Siphamia versicolor (Perciformes: Apogonidae) identified a ventral light organ, reflector, lens, duct, and a ventral diffuser extending from the throat to the caudal peduncle. The control and function of luminescence in this and other species of Siphamia, however, have not been defined. Morphological examination of fresh and preserved specimens identified additional components of the luminescence system involved in control and ventral emission of luminescence, including a retractable shutter over the ventral face of the light organ, contiguity of the ventral diffuser from the caudal peduncle to near the chin, and transparency of the bones and other tissues of the lower jaw. The shutter halves retract laterally, allowing the ventral release of light, and relax medially, blocking ventral light emission; topical application of norepinephrine to the exposed light organ resulted in retraction of the shutter halves, which suggests that operation of the shutter is under neuromuscular control. The extension of the diffuser to near the chin and transparency of the lower jaw allow a uniform emission of luminescence over the entire ventrum of the fish. The live aquarium‐held fish were found to readily and consistently display ventral luminescence. At twilight, the fish left the protective association with their longspine sea urchin, Diadema setosum, and began to emit ventral luminescence and to feed on zooplankton. Ventral luminescence illuminated a zone below and around the fish, which typically swam close to the substrate. Shortly after complete darkness, the fish stopped feeding and emitting luminescence. These observations suggest that S. versicolor uses ventral luminescence to attract and feed on zooplankton from the reef benthos at twilight. Ventral luminescence may allow S. versicolor to exploit for feeding the gap at twilight in the presence of potential predators as the reef transitions from diurnally active to nocturnally active organisms. J. Morphol., 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc     

Site fidelity and homing behaviour in coral reef cardinalfishes

Tagged adult cardinalfishes Apogon doederlini , Cheilodipterus artus and Cheilodipterus quinquilineatus persisted to within an average of 36–79 cm of their initial resting positions within One Tree Reef lagoon for over 8 months in A. doederlini and over 16 months in C. artus and C. quinquilineatus . In addition, 56–81% of tagged fish displaced c. 1 km, and 33–63% of tagged fish displaced c. 2 km returned to their point of collection within 3 days. As cardinalfishes are often found densely aggregated at resting sites, their extended use of specific sites on reefs may represent a localized, predictable resource for predators and a significant source of spatial variation in nutrient input to reef systems via faeces.